Thu 13 Nov 2014
Reviewed by William F. Deeck: WILLIAM DAVID SPENCER – Mysterium and Mystery: The Clerical Crime Novel.
Posted by Steve under Reference works / Biographies , Reviews[5] Comments
William F. Deeck
WILLIAM DAVID SPENCER – Mysterium and Mystery: The Clerical Crime Novel. UMI Research Press, hardcover, 1989, 344 pp., $49.95. Southern Illinois Press, softcover, 1992.
Perhaps I should start with a disclaimer: my theology, such as it is — or, sadly more accurately, was — was gained from nuns at a parochial school. Now that I can look back on it with detachment, they were dear ladies but woefully inadequate in their understanding of religion. Any questions not covered in the catechism were met with “Never mind” or disappointed looks or mitigated horror.
Thus, my understanding of Spencer’s chapter on “Modus Operandi: Mysterium into Mystery” is at best suspect, at worst completely befuddled. But I didn’t get the book so that I could learn theology; I got it to read about clerical detectives and their theology.
Spencer says — and I have no disagreement with him — that the clerical crime novel may be divided into three classifications. The most general, he says, is any tale that involves the clergy and crime. This type of novel involves “saintly side-kicks” — “as in Jack Webb’s or Thurmin [sic] Warriner’s tales or in a lesser sense in Christopher Leach’s Blood Games or Dorothy Salisbury Davis’s Where the Dark Streets Go.”
The second division is the novel in which a crime is committed by a cleric. Spencer provides several examples, though not the most unusual one, which I can’t name since to do so would be to give away whodunit.
Finally, and the focus of this book, are the mysteries solved by the cleric. Part One of Spencer’s treatise is “Rabbis and Robbers,” dealing with two tales from the Apocrypha and with the novels of Harry Kemelman. Although Spencer lists Joseph Telushkin in his “Graph of the Clerical Crime Novel in English,” Rabbi David Winter is not dealt with in this study.
Part Two is “Priests and Psychopaths,” the Roman Catholic clergy, both ordained and nonordained — in the latter case the various nuns and brothers.
Part Three is “Ministers and Murders” — yes, as you may have gathered, Spencer does have a thing for alliteration, even when it can be somewhat misleading- representing the various Protestant clergy.
How well does Spencer sum up the clergy characters and their theology? Quite well, I believe, in those cases in which I have read at least one of the books by an author. The only authors I haven’t read are Barbara Ninde Byfield, whom I hope to get around to shortly, and James L. Johnson, who wrote the Code Name Sebastian Series, a series, after reading Spencer’s descriptions of the novels, I feel I can skip without any loss. (Oh, all right, I merely started The Name of the Rose. Some people, I am informed, have read, enjoyed, and understood it, though I am dubious whether any one person did all three.)
Keep in mind, of course, that Spencer is not rating the clergy characters as detectives or the novels as detective tales; he is dealing with the books as to how they reflect the characters’ theology or, in one case, the near absence of it.
Errors? If you get as upset as I do over the misuse of “flaunt” for “flout,” you’d join me in considering that a mistake. Otherwise, except for his curious notion that Eco’s William of Baskerville chewed tobacco in fourteenth-century Europe, Spencer is, as far as I could tell, quite accurate in depicting plot and character.
Oversights? The only clergy detective not dealt with that I know of is the Reverend Peter Eversleigh, sometimes called the Padre, featured in several of Richard Goyne’s novels. This Protestant clergyman detective seems to have been overlooked by all who have published lists of religious sleuths. Since in the one novel I have read in which the Padre appears there is nothing about theology, perhaps no great loss has been suffered from lack of knowledge about him. The Lipstick Clue (Paul, 1954) is, however, a rather decent novel of detection.
Is Mysterium and Mysteries a fair value at $49.95? I paid that price, and I feel it was worth it. After all, there is a fair amount of information about clerical detectives as detectives but very little about their theology. Dedicated fans of the Divine Mystery, or Holy Terror, or the clerical crime novel, or whatever you want to call it, probably should own this study. Others should suggest that their public library acquire it.
November 13th, 2014 at 7:17 am
I usually buy all the mystery and detective reference books as they are published but this one I never bothered buying. I see abebooks has several copies at very low copies, including one for $1.31 plus postage.
November 13th, 2014 at 11:50 am
I don’t own a copy of this one, and even at $1.31, I’m not sure I will rush out and buy one. Bill makes it sound interesting, though, and maybe even useful, so who knows. One thing I know is that in 1989, $49.99 was a lot of money.
November 13th, 2014 at 11:28 am
I think I received a review copy at the time it was published and I still have it. This reminds me that I need to do something about getting my reference collection moved to Special Collections at the University of Minnesota.
November 13th, 2014 at 3:02 pm
I never knew about this book, but there is an even more impressive website on the same topic called Clerical Detectives created by Philip Grosset. Bill would’ve been happy to see that Rev. Peter Eversleigh justly has his own in-depth page. The website is an impressive feat, covers an amazing amount of writers and characters, and I believe is regularly updated. That Grosset managed to include one of the most obscure clerical detectives of the Golden Age — Rev. Buckle created by “Nicholas Brady”, aka John V Turner — alone earns him high praise from me.
November 13th, 2014 at 4:38 pm
This is a sub genre I am all over the place on. I have ones I love, the Disney novel he mentioned, Father Brown of course (am I the only one who hates what the current television series has done to Chesterton?), Leonard Webber’s Father Bredder, Boris Ackunin’s nun sleuth, Perez-Reverte’s Father Quarles in THE SEVILLE COMMUNION, Souer Angel, Victor Whitechurch’s novels, Charles Williams thrillers, John Fuller’s FLIGHT TO NOWHERE, Uncle Abner (he is at least a lay preacher), Anthony Boucher’s Sister Ursula, Kemmelman’s Rabbi … but then again I could never finish a Ralph McInnery novel and despite being a Protestant I can’t think of a Protestant sleuth other than Uncle Abner who doesn’t annoy me.
The Archbishop of Canterbury is the hero of E.C. Bentley’s thriller ELEPHANT WORK (the less said about that the better). Of course T.S. Eliot’s MURDER IN THE CATHEDRAL, Sayer’s THE NINE TAILORS, and P.D. James Dalgliesh novel. Graham Greene, Morris West, Richard Condon, and E. Richard Nash all wrote books with thriller roots with backsliding priests and even Pope’s of less than pure actions.
In general I find the clerical sleuth hard to bring off — its a delicate balance to fill both sets of shoes and hard to humanize them and still give them the moral weight their position calls for — probably why so many of them don’t really work for me. I suspect the dearth of Protestant sleuths is for the same reason you don’t see as many Protestant ministers as priest’s an rabbi’s in movies — they are too close to everyday experience, not exotic enough to hang much on and too trivial if you depict them with wife and children and the other facets of everyday existence.
It would be no problem for a really good writer, but even the most dedicated Protestant has to admit there is more inherent drama in a priest or rabbi than your average minister. Somehow shopping at Wal-Mart, driving a SUV, taking the kids to soccer practice,and the King James version of the BIBLE doesn’t lend itself to the same drama and exoticism of the catechism and the TORAH. in your average mystery plot.