Tue 18 Dec 2018
A Movie Review by Dan Stumpf: KIND LADY (1935).
Posted by Steve under Crime Films , Reviews[14] Comments
KIND LADY MGM, 1935. Aline MacMahon, Basil Rathbone, Mary Carlisle, Frank Albertson, Dudley Digges, Murray Kinnell, Justine Chase, Eiley Malyon, Barbara Shields, and Donald Meek. Screenplay by Bernard Schubert, from the play by Edward Chodorov, from the story by Hugh Walpole (which is a bit of a downer). Directed by George B. Seitz.
A real treat: literate, suspenseful, perfectly played and subtly directed.
Aline MacMahon carries her end skillfully as a middle-aged woman who has become a bit too retiring – not cutting off social ties exactly, but fraying them considerably, perfectly content to stay at home in her fine London townhouse attended by her cook and maid.
Then, on Christmas Eve, she sees a penniless sidewalk artist (Basil Rathbone in a chameleonic mode) outside her house, invites him in, and listens sympathetically as he speaks of his wife and child. He leaves with a bit of charity and her expensive cigarette lighter, and she thinks no more of it until he calls again a few nights later and tries to sell her one of his paintings.
He points out his wife, waiting outside, and (as if on cue) she collapses in the street. Rathbone runs for a doctor (Murray Kinnell) who says the woman must be put in bed immediately, apparently thinking she lives there, and carries her to an upstairs bedroom for a few days’ rest.
And thus has her home been invaded. Rathbone, suddenly imperious, irritates the cook into quitting, browbeats the maid, and when some friends of his sick wife come to call, they insist — forcefully — on staying, imprisoning Ms MacMahon in her own house, then proceed to sell the furnishings and take over her bank accounts as they plan her untimely end.
The basic story is cunningly wrought, opened out nicely by scenarist Bernard Schubert without losing the essential claustrophobic nature of the piece. The players do quite well by it, notably Rathbone starting off poor-but-proud and moving on to insufferable. Dudley Digges radiates good-natured cheer like fingernails on a chalkboard, and his wife and daughter….
Well, this is a subtle touch that screams for attention. Director George B. Seitz uses body language cunningly throughout the film: Basil Rathbone seems to tower over everyone and stand entirely too close. Dudly Digges doesn’t sit on the couch; he sprawls. As soon as his wife enters the house she starts fondling the table legs(!), and the daughter can’t keep her hands off things, picking up delicate knick-knacks, rifling through makeup, and generally behaving like a klepto-fetishist. The whole effect is of an alien invasion, and it’s damn creepy.
Aline MacMahon shines throughout this part of the film, but she does it quietly. Drugged by Rathbone & co., she resists the opiates but tries not to let them see, keeping her movements restrained to the point where sometimes we the viewers aren’t sure how clearly she’s thinking. Then she slips someone a note, gives a veiled warning, or otherwise lets us know there’s more going on here than meets the eye.
Two other performances of note: as Aline’s nephew-in-law who senses something amiss, Frank Albertson throws in a brash portrayal that seems to have come from another movie — completely at odds with the other players, but somehow right for the part. Five year later he was doing the same schtick in Man-Made Monster to less effect.
And then there’s Donald Meek, the eternal milquetoast, displaying delightful heroism as a little guy with a stubborn streak. It’s a surprising, comic and totally delightful moment in a film that kept me watching with equal parts suspense and pleasure.
December 18th, 2018 at 2:49 pm
There is also a remake from 1951 with Ethel Barrymore, Maurice Evans, Angela Lansbury and Keenan Wynn.Which must indicate how good this film was.
December 18th, 2018 at 4:59 pm
I saw there was a remake, but I haven’t seen either one. The second one has a good list of cast members too. Has anyone seen both? If you or anyone can compare the two, I’d like to her from you.
December 18th, 2018 at 3:11 pm
Somehow I managed to miss KIND LADY in my cursory rundown of mystery plays:
https://carrdickson.blogspot.com/2018/08/miscellaneous-mondaynumber-thirty.html
Good review, Dan.
December 18th, 2018 at 4:52 pm
That’s a great list, Mike. I especially enjoyed all of the photos you added. I think you’ve covered the the best and most well-known ones, but if mystery plays are of special interest to you, a fellow named Amnon Kabatchnik has written a four-book set listing some 400 of them. (Some are better than others.) You can find the books on Amazon and other fine stores.
December 18th, 2018 at 5:19 pm
How much different thematically speaking do you think Dirk Bogarde’s The Servant was. I see it as spinning off.
December 18th, 2018 at 5:22 pm
Aha. Thanks, Barry.
December 18th, 2018 at 5:41 pm
Ah, just one more thing. PLAYBILL ONLINE tells us that KIND LADY ran for 107 performances in 1940 . . .
http://www.playbill.com/production/kind-lady-playhouse-theatre-vault-0000009424
. . . and there were two names in the cast that many might recognize, Dorothy McGuire and Melchor Ferrer (better known as Mel):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_McGuire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Ferrer
December 18th, 2018 at 6:55 pm
Steve, the later film was more Barrymore-centric, if you know what I mean. And the supporting cast was good, but not as unsettling as the lesser-known players of the earlier film.
December 18th, 2018 at 7:18 pm
“from the story by Hugh Walpole (which is a bit of a downer).”
Why a downer? This sounds like the sort of thing Walpole could do well – Mr Perrin and Mr Traill or The Old Ladies have similar themes by the sound of it – the destruction of innocent ineffectual people by ruthless egotists.
December 18th, 2018 at 8:59 pm
Roger, trust me on this. Listen to me as if I were Cerberus, barking at you with all my heads. the story is depressing!
December 18th, 2018 at 9:14 pm
The second film isn’t bad but Evans and Barrymore are too aware of the stage origins leaving the original film much better as a film rather than a filmed play.
Where Rathbone originally seems sympathetic Evans is a baddie from the start. As Dan says the cast in this early version does much more with the material.
He is also right that it is a very depressing story thankfully lightened a bit for the stage and screen.
December 19th, 2018 at 2:33 am
I’ve read the story, Dan – it is depressing, but very well written. Like I said, it’s the kind of story that Walpole knew – felt – how to do.
I thought you meant Walpole was a downer, as in a bad writer – which he could often be, but when he writes kind of thing he usually does it well, though it isn’t a bundle of laughs.
December 19th, 2018 at 6:25 am
Roger, I’m glad we didn’t come to blows over it, this close to Christmas.
December 20th, 2018 at 8:49 pm
No posts should have exactly 13 comments.