Tue 17 Oct 2017
A Movie Review by Jonathan Lewis: THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU (1977).
Posted by Steve under Action Adventure movies , Reviews , SF & Fantasy films[5] Comments
THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU. American International Pictures, 1977. Burt Lancaster (Dr. Paul Moreau), Michael York, Nigel Davenport, Barbara Carrera, Richard Basehart. Based on the novel by H. G. Wells. Director: Don Taylor.
Burt Lancaster puts in a superb performance as the Dr. Moreau in this 1977 cinematic adaptation of the extraordinarily influential H.G. Wells novella about a mad scientist turning animals into men on a remote Pacific island.
Unlike Charles Laughton in the pre-code sleazefest Islands of Lost Souls (1932), who never seemed to be a comfortable fit for the role, Lancaster portrays Moreau as a vaguely sympathetic antihero who genuinely wants to do good for the work, but who gradually transforms into a bestial, hateful figure. Lancaster had a way of just using his eyes to convey emotion and he does it wonderfully here. His Moreau is a great movie villain. Why? Because he has reasons for doing what he is doing and, more importantly, deep down he thinks he’s doing the right thing.
That’s not to say that Michael York, whose performance I absolutely loved as D’Artagnan in The Three Musketeers (1973), isn’t good in this film as well. He portrays Braddock, the shipwreck survivor who washes up on Moreau’s island, totally unaware of what he is about to encounter. But there’s something a little too innocent about the Braddock character. He’s nowhere near as formidable a figure as Moreau.
Which leads me to the film’s plot. In many ways, if one were to view Braddock (York) as the protagonist, the movie would be a meandering mess. This is mainly because, for most of the movie, it’s not clear exactly what Braddock wants. To escape the island? Unlike in Island of Lost Souls where the shipwrecked man was truly trapped on the island, Braddock actually still has his rowboat. It’s a little worse for wear, but he’s safely hidden it on the island.
So escaping is not what he wants. Is it that he wants to discover what Moreau is up to? Well, it doesn’t take him long to do so and Moreau is more than willing to fill in the blanks. It’s only toward the tail end of the movie that he actually wants something – to escape from Moreau’s captivity after the mad doctor performed a sick experiment on him – but that’s too little too late.
What makes the movie work is not York’s character, but Lancaster’s. The Island of Dr. Moreau is truly the story of Dr. Moreau, about his ambitions and his downfall. In that sense, the film is as much as horror story as a tragedy. And that’s where Lancaster’s stellar performance comes in. Portraying Moreau as a man capable of great things, but who succumbs to his own bestial nature, is what makes this adaptation, despite its numerous flaws, a chilling portrait of a scientist who defies the laws of nature and pays the ultimate price for it.
October 17th, 2017 at 8:22 am
I love the Laughton film to the point of madness, so I avoided this in the 70s. Your review makes me reconsider.
October 17th, 2017 at 1:27 pm
That novelization was done by “Joseph Silva,” a.k.a. Ron Goulart.
October 17th, 2017 at 4:49 pm
The novel of the film of the novel…
I liked the Laughton version too and thought that Laughton fitted into the role very well – his stumpy ferocious character had something of the look of the animals humanised by surgery and cruelty. Lancaster would be a different kind of “god” to the man-animals – a more convincing one, probably.
Surely Braddock’s problem is that even though he has a rowing boat, where could he row to? He’s on a remote island far from most shipping lines. It’s a choice of something close to the devil and the deep blue sea.
October 17th, 2017 at 7:41 pm
I’ve read Wells’ novella. But not seen any of the at least eight film and TV versions.
The novella recalls Robert Louis Stevenson. First in the sea adventure at the start. Then in all the interest in describing atmosphere and light.
You can see echoes of Wells’ novella in later sf writers like Hal Clement and Cordwainer Smith.
October 17th, 2017 at 11:38 pm
I enjoyed this version, and it has a fine cast, but I don’t think it holds a candle to the Laughton version, or Lancaster to Laughton. We can all agree it blows away the Brando/Kilmer version though.
The novel is probably the only anti vivisectionist tract still read by anyone.
And it created its own subdivision of SF and Horror literary and cinema still popping upon various forms today.