Sat 7 Jul 2018
A Movie Review by David Vineyard: ACCOMPLICE (1946).
Posted by Steve under Mystery movies , Reviews[9] Comments
ACCOMPLICE. PRC, 1946. Richard Arlen, Veda Ann Borg, Tom Dugan, Francis Ford, Herbert Rawlinson. Screenplay Irving Elman, Frank Gruber based on the latter’s novel Simon Lash, Private Detective. Directed by Walter Colmes.
A complex plot, sharp dialogue, a smart story based on a classic hardboiled novel, and a well-staged shootout in the California desert at a castle turned dude ranch run by crooked Francis Ford are all on the plus side for this fast moving mystery film.
So why isn’t it better?
The directors penchant for flat two shots on cheap sets doesn’t help, but even that isn’t the real problem.
The real problem is the cast.
This kind of hard-boiled mystery depends on delivery, snappy tongue-in-cheek delivery by actors with on screen charisma and style.
That is neither Richard Arlen or Veda Ann Borg, who deliver their lines with all the skill and depth of a high school adaptation of Arsenic and Old Lace.
Book-loving Simon Lash would rather try to prove Billy the Kid was a backshooter than take a case, especially a divorce case, but when he is broke and Joyce Marlow, nee Mrs. James Bonniwell shows up, the girl who left him at the altar ten years earlier when he was a promising lawyer, shows up on his doorstep, his partner Eddie (Tom Dugan) convinces him to see her.
Simon suspects Joyce is looking for evidence for a divorce case against her banker hubby, but she convinces him her husband has lost his memory and gone missing. But when his search leads to a love nest the husband is keeping with another woman, Simon thinks he has been taken by Joyce again — until she receives a call while he is confronting her that her husband has been found with his head blown off in the desert.
From then on things move at a pace until the finale when Simon is taken prisoner at the above mentioned desert castle and escapes to shoot it out with the bad guys while unfolding the complex and well planned plot.
Sounds great, and on the written page the dialogue by Gruber from his novel has the punch and snap that is proper to the best private eye fare on the screen. The only problem is the delivery which could gives pancakes a run for which is flatter.
There isn’t a moment of charm, a twinkle of eye, or a playful seductive moment in the film. It’s in the script, but Arlen and Borg deliver their lines (and no one else does any better, including the unfunny comic relief) like they were reading them off a prompter for the first time.
You know you are in trouble when you find yourself longing for Tom Conway or Warner Baxter from the Falcon and Crime Doctor films.
Had this been a Michael Shayne entry with Lloyd Nolan or a Falcon or even Charlie Chan film it would be a classic, but alas it is a film which stars Richard Arlen and Veda Ann Borg and the biggest collection of stiffs collecting a pay check in the history of film.
Even a master like Frank Gruber can’t overcome amateur night at the Bijou.
July 7th, 2018 at 8:22 pm
My opinion of this film is almost the same as yours, David, but if possible, I think I may have liked it less than you did:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=9201
July 7th, 2018 at 9:20 pm
I understand that Accomplice was shot in less than a week and that they could not get it out until PRC had a hole in their schedule to fill. As for the cast, Dick Arlen was seldom without a job for more than thirty years, not to be dismissed. Veda Ann Borg was likewise, employed. And Francis Ford always welcome visitor in my home. I have not seen the film, but it is impossible to be effective in something produced on t he quick. Not that quick, in any case.
July 8th, 2018 at 5:17 am
If it was made in a week, perhaps the cast were reading their lines off a prompter for the first time.
July 8th, 2018 at 8:13 am
Arlen was a strong actor within his range, but wise-cracking PI was well outside it.
And Barry, you’re mostly right, but there are a couple of PRC 1-week wonders that really work.
July 8th, 2018 at 9:50 am
Dan, of course, your observation about a couple of these quickies being good is right, but they were done by a more talented production team, and almost certainly with longer prep time. And within the logical range of the players. Walter Colmes and Richard Arlen in about t he same time frame made a picture called Identity Unknown, not without its flaws, and not requiring any kind of style, but with a more than acceptable, if mild, result.
July 8th, 2018 at 3:47 pm
Barry,
Arlen and Borg both did better in many films (WINGS and the SHADOW serial to name two) I hold in some esteem, but their limitations show here where better actors could have given the perfectly decent dialogue the right treatment.
Agreed one week isn’t much time to make even a programmer, but others have done so with better results.
The performances here are extremely flat even for a low budget film, and it isn’t the director or the script which are the usual suspects. Arlen and Borg are the best actors in the films save Francis Ford, who is always Francis Ford and always reliable, but they haven’t the delivery or the charisma needed to pull this off.
If I’m hard on the cast it’s because there is nothing wrong with script, pedestrian direction, or even the cheap sets (for once there are plenty of decent exteriors in a PRC), the flaws are all with the actors.
July 9th, 2018 at 9:18 pm
That’s the oddest name for an actor, “ichard Arlen” or am I the only one who noticed your bizarre spelling?
July 9th, 2018 at 9:53 pm
I have no idea where that missing “R” went, andy.
But I’ve fxied it now.
July 10th, 2018 at 9:24 pm
ood!