Fri 17 Jan 2020
A PI Movie Review by Dan Stumpf: TONY ROME (1967).
Posted by Steve under Mystery movies , Reviews[5] Comments
TONY ROME. Fox, 1967. Frank Sinatra, Jill St John, Richard Conte, Gena Rowlands, Simon Oakland, Sue Lyon, Robert J Wilke, Rocky Graziano, Michael Romanoff and Shecky Greene. Screenplay by Richard Breen, based on the novel Miami Mayhem, by Anthony Rome (Pocket Books, 1960); later published by Dell (1967) as Tony Rome, under the author’s true name Marvin H. Albert. Directed by Gordon Douglas.
Required viewing.
The success of Harper (1966) sparked a modest revival of movie PIs, giving us Gunn (1967), PJ (1968) and Tony Rome to liven up the waning decade – not that the 60s needed much enlivening, thank you, but this was a worthy entry in the cycle, a film that flaunts its vulgarity with commendable energy.
Gordon Douglas’s punchy direction helps a lot, and Sinatra approaches the tough PI part… well, not seriously, but he doesn’t phone it in either, and he’s supported by a cast that moves easily through the gaudy squalor. I particularly liked Robert J. Wilke as Rome’s ex-cop ex-partner:
TURPIN: “I saved your life.â€
ROME: “I could square that with a stick of chewing gum.â€
Even Jill St John seems at ease as a much-divorced lady of what we used to call “easy virtue†who makes her entrance walking toward Sinatra as Sue Lyon hisses “SLUT!â€
FRANK: “Well now that we’ve been introduced…”
JILL: “Slut’s just my nick name.”
The story involves… well, I never could get it straight. Something about missing diamonds, shady jewelers, hired killers and unhappy wives. TONY ROME also takes advantage of the loosened restrictions of its time to bring in a few gay characters, all them treated shabbily; standards had grown looser but not matured.
This aside, Tony Rome offers everything a fan of the genre could ask: clever dialogue, brutal fight scenes and sudden shoot-outs (director Douglas’s signature bit was a guy returning fire even as he visibly shudders under the impact of his opponent’s bullets) and an attitude at once flip and gritty. And it all leads to a resolution that recalls the weary disenchantment of Double Indemnity.
Don’t mistake me. Tony Rome is miles away from Wilder’s classic by just about any standard. But its trashy attitude is just perfect for the PI film of a troubled time.
January 17th, 2020 at 6:46 pm
H’umm. I’ve too long confused this with ‘Assault on a Queen’ so I appreciate this review which makes each of these two titles more distinct for me. Thanks!
January 17th, 2020 at 8:23 pm
I never saw this one, but I do remember the sequel, LADY IN CEMENT. It was playing at a local drive-in, and after maybe ten minutes, my wife and I looked at each otHER and asked, “Should we stay?†and we didn’t. We might not have made the right decision, but since then I’m afraid I’ve taken it out on this one as well.
Maybe it’s time to give it a chance. I don’t know, though. Dan’s review vs. that trailer. It’s hard to say.
January 17th, 2020 at 9:10 pm
Steve,
You and Judy got it right.
January 17th, 2020 at 10:31 pm
“And Tony Rome will get you if you don’t watch out …”
For all its vulgarity, political incorrectness, and rawness TONY ROME is a solid P.I. film done slickly and with a rather shop worn style and look that fits quite well.
Sinatra may not be vying for an Oscar, but he plays Rome more seriously than many of his films from this era, much less the Ring a Ding Ding attitude of many of his films.
I’m in something of a minority in liking LADY IN CEMENT, which is basically FAREWELL MY LOVELY with Dan Blocker in the Moose Molloy role.
Richard Conte fares well in both films as Rome’s tired police friend.
January 18th, 2020 at 11:14 pm
Gordon Douglas was a pro who made some solid films.
But TONY ROME isn’t one of them. It’s just not that good.
I liked the building where the hero had his office.