Fri 9 Sep 2016
A Western Movie Review by Jonathan Lewis: ONLY THE VALIANT (1951).
Posted by Steve under Reviews , Western movies[5] Comments
ONLY THE VALIANT. Warner Brothers, 1951. Gregory Peck, Barbara Payton, Ward Bond, Gig Young, Lon Chaney, Neville Brand, Jeff Corey, Warner Anderson. Based on the novel by Charles Marquis Warren. Director: Gordon Douglas.
For a movie that, truth be told, isn’t structurally all that sound, Only the Valiant remains overall quite entertaining. Adapted from the eponymous 1943 novel by Charles Marquis Warren, the movie, while far better than many other Westerns released in the same era, suffers from the same ailment that afflicts far too many Westerns based on novels: namely, it tries to do too much.
Rather than condense the backstories and numerous subplots, the film keeps them in, but in such an abbreviated manner that they all become muddled, leaving the viewer to wonder exactly what is motivating different characters.
Gregory Peck, who apparently later considered Only the Valiant to have been his least favorite film project, portrays Captain Richard Lance, a hard-nosed U.S. Army Cavalry officer posted in the New Mexico Territory. And with New Mexico comes Apache warriors ready to fight the newly arrived White settlers. After Capt. Lance and his men capture Apache leader, Tucsos (Michael Ansara) at an Army fort decimated by Apache violence, a debate erupts as to what to do with the captive. Lance, known for being by the book, rejects the suggestion that they should kill Tucsos outright.
This decision sets in motion a series of events that leads Capt. Lance and a handpicked crew of misfits from within the ranks back to the destroyed Army fort. There, the men will make a final stand both against the Apaches and themselves. In the course of their suicide mission, some men will all but crack under the pressure. Others will lash out against the hated Capt. Lance. Sergeant Ben Murdock (Neville Brand), for instance, loathes Lance for denying him a promotion.
On the other hand, Trooper Kebussyan (Lon Chaney), a soldier of Arab descent, loathes Lance for reasons never satisfactorily explained. The same could be said for Trooper Rutledge (Warner Anderson) and Trooper Saxton (Terry Kilburn), both whom seem to want to kill Capt. Lance. But the backstories why are so condensed that it leaves the viewer a bit puzzled as to what Lance has done to earn so much enmity.
Muddying the waters even more is the fact that Only the Valiant does not do a particularly good job in introducing other important characters to the audience. Case in point is Captain Eversham (Hugh Sanders), father of Lance’s love interest, Cathy Eversham (Barbara Payton). One again suspects that the movie leaves out important details found in the book, a work that I admittedly have not had the chance to read.
Despite these flaws, however, Only the Valiant ends up being a perfectly watchable movie. Ironically, a lot of this stems from the fact that one often doesn’t have a clear idea of what direction the plot is going to go. Is it going to be a film about a doomed romantic relationship on an Army outpost, a movie about men bonding in the heat of battle, or something completely different?
In retrospect, I actually enjoyed watching the movie as the story unfolded more than I find myself appreciating it as a final product. Make of that what you will.
September 9th, 2016 at 8:44 pm
Any movie with Gregory Peck in it is going to watchable, as far as I’m concerned. But I agree with Jon. Too many of the characters had back stories and prior connections that were (I also am assuming) in the book, but there simply was no time o get them all in the movie.
September 10th, 2016 at 8:54 am
The studio “exteriors” are unconvincing, especially for what should have been a big-budget Western.
Barbara Payton and Gig Young both lost their respective battles with drugs & alcohol.
September 10th, 2016 at 11:04 pm
The perils of adapting a novel too faithfully. Ironically Warren himself was a fine screenwriter adapting others works.
This one improves if you have read the book, which is well worth reading, but honestly you shouldn’t have to know the book to enjoy a film.
October 5th, 2016 at 6:13 pm
I just finished reading the book(multiple copies are available on abebooks.com) and found it to be very good. It does go into more detail than the movie and the characters are properly developed in the novel. However the film does an excellent job of condensing the plot into 1 hour and 45 minutes.
A fine portrait of cavalry life after the Civil War.
April 2nd, 2021 at 10:53 pm
No one scowls quite like Peck!
…Brand vs Peck would be a battle of Goliaths