Sun 16 Oct 2011
Archived Review: PATRICIA MOYES – Death and the Dutch Uncle.
Posted by Steve under Authors , Reviews[10] Comments
PATRICIA MOYES – Death and the Dutch Uncle. Holt Rinehart & Winston; hardcover, 1968. Owl, paperback, 1983. Original UK edition: Collins Crime Club, hardcover, 1968.
After not reading her books for years, for no good reason I can think of, I’ve recently enjoyed several of Patricia Moyes’ detective novels, coming to think of her as one of the few remaining practitioners of the old-fashioned detective novel.
As this book shows, however, she should stay away from writing thrillers, or books where Inspector Tibbett (and wife Emmy) get tangled into international intrigue.
It begins innocently enough, with the gangland slaying of a small time gambler and miscellaneous hoodlum (appropriately nicknamed “Flutter Byersâ€) in a private bar. What connection could there be between this death and PIFL (the Permanent International Frontier Litigation)? A recent squabble between two obscure African nations brings this backwater London agency into the headlines, and Tibbett surprisingly finds himself right in the thick of it.
As long as he stays in London, he seems to be on solid ground. It’s when he takes off for Holland (with wife Emmy) as part of a one-man (plus wife) effort to save one of the members of PIFL from an assassin’s bullet that that the novel began to lose its way.
Not even the mention, several times over, of Inspector van der Valk helps that much, although it does give Tibbett some sort of support in a jurisdiction the recently promoted Scotland Yard superintendent simply doesn’t have. (Van der Valk himself never makes an appearance.) And of course Emmy gets into trouble…
What I objected to even more, however, was the clumsy attempt to have a clue that means nothing to the reader (*) become a major key to the mystery. Moyes then compounds the insult by refusing to let us in on the explanation Henry gives Emmy on page 171.
A minor matter, perhaps, but after spending as much time on this case as I had up till then, I thought I deserved something more than being blown off like this.
(*) Well, unless you know Dutch, that is. I certainly don’t, and I’m also still miffed about the time it took to go back through the previous 170 pages to see if there was anybody with the name Filomeel I’d missed. (As it turns out, I did and I didn’t.)
Rating: D plus.
[UPDATE] 10-16-11. As you can tell, I felt let down by this one. What I can’t tell you is anything more about the book than this. I don’t remember it, not at all.
Let me return, though, to my first paragraph, in which I referred to Moyes as one of the last practitioners of the old-fashioned (British) detective novel. I still believe this to be true, some 18 years later, though of course there have been some contenders who have come along since then.
Kathi Maio’s 1001 Midnights review of A Six-Letter Word for Death, to be found here on this blog, agrees with this stance. On the other hand, I fear that in the same passage of 18 years, Patricia Moyes has become all but forgotten. I can’t say why, and perhaps it is not so. Opinions welcome!
October 16th, 2011 at 7:58 pm
Steve, Rue Morgue Press, who has reprinted some early Catherine Aird, is set to reprint some Moyes–so a revival is at hand!
I’ve only read a few by her–wasn’t blown away, but they were fair play detection.
October 16th, 2011 at 8:58 pm
I liked several of Patricia Moyes’ other books, even if this one not so much, so this is good news, Curt.
And for what it’s worth, I sell duplicate paperbacks on Amazon, and I’ve disposed of a six or eight of her books there in recent months. She doesn’t get a lot of notice in the mystery blogs, so far as I’ve noticed, but apparently she still has some readers.
October 16th, 2011 at 10:46 pm
I read Twice in a Blue Moon a while back, which dates from 1993. I don’t recall it being anything exceptional, but on the other hand I didn’t feel that it was time wasted. Kind of an in-betweener.
October 16th, 2011 at 11:42 pm
Bill, I think that was her last book, not the author at her best,
October 17th, 2011 at 9:24 am
Bill and Curt
Not having read TWICE IN A BLUE MOON (and I may not even have a copy) I’ll refrain from commenting directly about its merits, or lack thereof.
But it is not true of most (if not all?) prolific mystery writers, that one should judge them on their early (or mid-career) books, not the ones written toward the end?
— Steve
October 17th, 2011 at 8:20 am
I read her Crippen & Landru collection, WHO KILLED FATHER CHRISTMAS?, which might be a good place to start to see if you like her writing. I’ve never read one of her novels but I did like the stories.
October 17th, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Yes, I think that’s almost universally true in the case of prolific mystery writers with long careers.
Anthony Boucher loved Moyes, by the way (don’t know whether he lived to review Dutch Uncle).
October 17th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
I was tempted to give Patricia Moyes a shot when the RMP reissued one of her books, but I had to pass it up because the top of my to-be-read pile was still covered with snow. But the Dutch setting and linguistic clue of this book has piqued my interest and might end up reading her sooner than I anticipated.
Thanks for bringing this book under my attention!
October 17th, 2011 at 2:46 pm
TomCat
Be sure to let me know if it works better for you than it did for me.
— Steve
October 17th, 2011 at 3:42 pm
A review of the book will probably end up on my blog. That is, if I can easily obtain a copy. But I’m afraid the linguistic clue will probably immediately give the game away, so I don’t think it will be much different from your review.