Fri 27 Apr 2012
BARBARA WORSLEY-GOUGH – Alibi Innings. Michael Joseph, UK, hardcover, 1954. Penguin 1321, UK, paperback, 1958. No US edition.
There have been other mysteries taking place a cricket background, I’m sure, but I’ve never read any of them. I’m also sure that the game is described well in Alibi Innings, but I don’t know how to play cricket, and after reading this book, I still don’t. Readers in the UK would fare the same, I imagine, reading books in which the game of baseball is played.
But judge for yourself. Here’s an excerpt, from page 63:
The vast complexities of living had no place in this microcosm of white on green under blue. The Burgeon captain sent down an easy one, and he [the Squire] turned round the corner to fine leg. They could have run two, but Randall did not hurry.
It’s an idyllic day on a hot summer afternoon, an annual affair, withe Squire Easton’s team taking on the local villagers. It’s too bad that murder has to spoil it, but although it’s not said, it’s clear that Dr. Randall Curtis found the body of Mrs. Easton before the match began, and he said nothing, not to spoill the Squire’s day.
Mrs. Easton is one of those people about whom no one can say any good, an ill-tempered old woman who delighted in flaunting her power over others. And yet, as the author of Alibi Innings, Barbara Worsley-Gough makes us feel the sadness in her passing as no other mystery writer has done in my recent memory. Strangely enough, no one really minds that she is dead, but — if this makes sense — everyone is disturbed that she is no longer there.
There are only a finite number of suspects, though the inevitable cry goes up that it must have been a tramp or a gypsy. While this is a detective story, as must happen more often than not in real life, all of the mysterious clues and other misleading evidence seem to unravel themselves, rather the need of having a mastermind detective to stand up and take charge. More time is spent repairing some unfortunate marriages that are about to take place, and by the end of the story, everyone seems to be relieved that they are not.
According to Hubin, one of Worsley-Gough’s other novels (and there are eight listed inside the front cover of the Penguin editon) is a mystery (Lantern Hill, 1957), and one of the characters (the Squire’s closest friend, Aloysius Kelly) appears in that one as well. He’s not the detective of record in this one, however, making his flamboyant presence widely known in the first half, but fading away in the second.
This is an old-fashioned mystery, one with characters the reader will identify with, even though they no longer exist, and if they did, perhaps only for the shortest period of time and locale.
February 1991 (slightly revised).
[UPDATE] 04-27-12. Marv Lachman has written a long article in which he discusses many works of detective fiction in which the game of cricket plays a substantial role. You can find it here on the main Mystery*File website. As for me, even though I wrote this review over 20 years ago, I still have no idea how cricket is played. (It’s nothing I’m proud of. It just is.)
April 28th, 2012 at 11:16 am
The few discussions of cricket I’ve encountered in fiction are so overloaded with arcane terminology that it further clouded my understanding of the game and its rules. The excerpt you give above is a perfect example. Sports’ rules and play descriptions don’t seem to work to the uninitiated. However, visually learning is a completely different story. Compared to cricket baseball is very easy to understand by simply watching. I sort of have an idea what cricket is about by watching but it’s not as obvious as baseball. I doubt someone unfamiliar with American football would really know what is going on by simply watching. The rules about downs are not so easy to figure out by just watching. But European football is easily understood and is a much simpler game as far as rules and structure. (I don’t even like professional sports and here I’ve typed a mini analysis or four different games.)
Never heard of this writer or the book. But since cricket is not my bag I’ll skip it. I tend to avoid the sports mysteries, though I read one about fly fishing that was rather fascinating. THE POISON FLY MURDER by Harriet Rutland. Reviewed at my blog early last year.
April 28th, 2012 at 11:40 am
What I’m hoping is that someone will come along and translate that passage for me. I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s puzzled by it. Of course there may be typos in that quote that I don’t even know about!
Thanks for the review of the Rutland book. It sounds like a good one. Back early on when I first started this blog I reviewed a book by John Gilligan entitled THE NAIL KNOT, and in the review I included a list of all of the fly-fishing mysteries I could come up with. I didn’t know about THE POISON FLY MURDER, and it should have been there:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=164
Also on the main M*F website is a long article by Jim Felton that includes a long list of detective fiction that in which the game of hockey as part of background.
Check it out at https://mysteryfile.com/Hockey/Refs.html. It’s a longer list than anyone might think!
But of all the sports, I think there are more golfing mysteries than any others. I’m sure there’s a list of all of them somewhere online. […]
I’m back. Thanks goodness for Google. This may not be the one I’m thinking of, but it came up first and it looks comprehensive:
http://librarybooklists.org/mybooklists/mysteriesgolf
April 28th, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Steve, there are plenty of of golf mysteries, but I’m pretty sure they are far outnumbered by horse racing mysteries. Sports terminology is a sticky wicket. I put cricket references in two short stories published at about the same time, and each of them had reference to an innings, which is correctly singular in cricket lingo, but which American editors quite understandably corrected to an inning, a term familiar in baseball but not in that form in cricket. And for a really horrible example of mangling sports terminology, see some of the baseball references in otherwise smooth reading translations of the excellent mysteries by Cuban novelist Leonardo Padura, obviously done by a British translator who doesn’t know the lingo and couldn’t be bothered to check with someone who did.
April 28th, 2012 at 2:57 pm
Jon
I agree and stand corrected on the number of horse racing mysteries there are. Thousands, I sure! I could be cynical and say that horse racing and the criminal element are well nigh inseparable. And given a few minutes to think about it, of course this leads me right away to wonder if maybe boxing mysteries don’t also well outnumber the golfing ones. Unless the mob has taken up an interest in golf, which I don’t think they have?
That’s an amusing story about the problems that Leonardo Padura’s translator had with the concept of baseball. Other than ADIOS HEMINGWAY, which I have, I hadn’t realized that any of Padura’s other detective novels had showed up in English. I just looked into it, and his earlier books all seem to have been translated, but only after the Hemingway book came out. I haven’t even gotten around to reading that one yet, and here I am, adding even more books to my Want List!
April 28th, 2012 at 4:33 pm
In cricket- oriented mysteries, the murderer is obvious, the motive clear, and the cricket
OUT OF THIS WORLD !
The Doc