Fri 20 Apr 2007
STEP BY STEP. RKO Radio Pictures, 1946. Lawrence Tierney, Anne Jeffreys, Jason Robards Sr., George Cleveland. Screenwriter: Stuart Palmer. Director: Phil Rosen.
I don’t know his career all that well, but I know enough to make it awfully hard to imagine that the tough-looking Lawrence Tierney had many leading roles in which he wasn’t the villain. Nonetheless, here he is in this low budget postwar mystery movie, pairing up with a deliciously blonde Anne Jeffreys to help nab a gang of Nazi spies somewhere along the sunny California coast.

Fresh out of the Marines, Johnny Christopher (Tierney) spots Evelyn Smith (Jeffreys) while she’s swimming in the ocean, and in a two-piece bathing suit yet. Not easily taking a friendly no for an answer, he follows her to the house where she’s working as a Senator’s secretary, but another Miss Smith seems to have taken her place. Johnny’s Miss Smith is nowhere in sight.
Bringing the police in does not help, and in fact makes things worse. When the bodies start to pile up, he’s immediately been tagged as being a semi-delusional if not cracked-up war veteran, and his Miss Smith, when found, quickly becomes his partner on the lam.
Although I admit that the plot is ridden with as many holes as that legendary slice of Swiss cheese, it still tickled my fancy to see fate conspire against the pair of fugitives, with every step they take getting them more and more deeply into trouble. George Cleveland, playing a cranky but lovable old motel owner, is the only one who believes in them.
Since I watched a print that omitted the opening credits, I didn’t recognize Anne Jeffreys until I looked it up after the movie was over, but with her long blonde hair curled up slightly at the ends, I didn’t take my eyes off her very often. Even as a misunderstood hero, Lawrence Tierney played his part as if he were an old-fashioned pocket watch that has been wound up too tightly and is ready to burst into a flying display of gears, cogs and pieces of broken springs at the slightest provocation.

And on two occasions, he does, in a couple of high-flying, hard-punching fist-fights in which he nearly bounces off the walls in the bargain. A good film that the critics didn’t care for (*), but on the other hand, five out of six IMDB viewers so far have thought it was as much fun to watch as I did.
—
(*) Here, for example, are some of Bosley Crowther’s contemporaneous comments as they appeared in The New York Times: “Even two murders don’t relieve the tedium of this incredible tale about an ex-Marine and a chance feminine acquaintance who stumble into a Nazi espionage plot in sunny California and get quite a pushing around before their innocence is established and the spies are apprehended. As the principals Lawrence Tierney and Anne Jeffreys move through the film like two bewildered innocents in search of a director.”
April 21st, 2007 at 8:45 pm
I’ll look for the movie as a possible rental. I also found Bosley Crowther’s judgment interesting. I’d like to see an anthology of contemporary comments about older movies and books in lower-brow genres that we now consider classics or at least respectable — or at least an anthology of comments from critics with names like “Bosley.”
===================
Detectives Beyond Borders
“Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home”
http://detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/
April 21st, 2007 at 9:38 pm
[…] Peter Rozovsky has just left a comment after my review of Step by Step, posted about this same time yesterday. Peter found what NY Times movie critic Bosley Crowther said about the film to be very interesting. (Crowther didn’t like it very much, and he said so.) […]
April 22nd, 2007 at 5:22 pm
Steve,
Phil Rosen was a big time director in the silents, reduced to B movies by 1946. TCM shows his “The Young Rajah” (1922) – baby Indian prince is smuggled out of country to guard against murderous uncle, grows up in New England to become Rudolph Valentino! Wonderful fun.
“Step by Step” is enjoyable — but does not seem much like Stuart Palmer’s Miss Withers tales.
>> Hi Mike. Phil Rosen also did some of the Charlie Chan movies in the 1940s. I remember reviewing “The Scarlet Clue” (1945) not too long ago. Before that, he directed “Roar of the Press” (1941), which I commented on even earlier. But, yes, you’re certainly correct. When he did “Step by Step,” his career was all but over. He probably got fed up with dealing with low budgets.
I’m not sure if you meant the Miss Withers stories in print or on film, but Stuart Palmer didn’t have anything to do with the movies but provide the source material, did he? It’s been a long time since I read the books. As far as mysteries are concerned, I’m going to have to start my reading career all over again! –Steve
>> Mike Grost’s reply, via email:
Steve,
Agreed: Palmer had nothing to do with the Withers movies — just the books. But Palmer also did a lot of Hollywood scripts. “Step By Step” seems to be the last one. I’ve seen a few of the movies he wrote — and have been having trouble relating them to the style or content of his prose mysteries. One would never guess that the writer of “Step By Step” also wrote the Withers books. Maybe I need a second look!
>> And from a followup email, after I wondered in reply why I found “Step by Step” to be entertaining. Was it Stuart Palmer’s screenplay, even though I found holes in the plot? Was it the performances of the actors, individually or in an ensemble effect? Was it Phil Rosen’s direction? I don’t know.
Your comments on “Step by Step” stir up a lot of interesting questions. What IS a good film? Why do we like them? What are Rosen’s characteristics as a director? Palmer’s as a scriptwriter? I can’t answer any of these.
Mike
April 22nd, 2007 at 6:16 pm
A Miss Withers mention is interesting. I haven’t been terribly excited either by Miss Withers or by John (?) Malone individually, but when Stuart Palmer got together with “Craig” Rice, and they wrote a story starring both sleuths, I loved the result. I would like to read more, if they wrote more than just the one story.
===================
Detectives Beyond Borders
“Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home”
http://detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/
April 22nd, 2007 at 6:59 pm
Peter, I’ve never been too sure of this, but I believe that there were six stories that Malone and Miss Withers were both in, and all of them are in the following collection:
People vs. Withers and Malone Stuart Palmer & Craig Rice (Simon, 1963, hc) [Hildegarde Withers; John J. Malone].
* • Autopsy and Eva • ss EQMM Aug ’54
* • Cherchez la Frame • nv EQMM Jun ’51
* • Once Upon a Train • nv EQMM Oct ’50
* • People vs. Withers and Malone • ss
* • Rift in the Loot • ss EQMM Apr ’55
* • Withers and Malone, Brain-Stormers • na EQMM Feb ’59
Film (based on ss “Once Upon a Train”): MGM, 1950, as Mrs. O’Malley and Mr. Malone (scw: William Bowers; dir: Norman Taurog).
James Whitmore was fine as Malone, but the character of Miss Withers was changed to “Hattie O’Malley,” who was played by Marjorie Main. A little Marjorie Main goes a long way, as far as I’m concerned.
April 22nd, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Many thanks. I seem now to vaguely recall such a collection. I’ll look for it.
===================
Detectives Beyond Borders
“Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home”
http://detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/
May 20th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
[…] 20 May 2007 Michael Grost on STUART PALMER and STEP BY STEP (the movie). Posted by Steve under Authors , Mystery movies , Reviews As you mayremember, Mike Grost and I recently exchanged some friendly comments after my review of Step by Step, the 1946 film starring Lawrence Tierney and Anne Jeffreys. The director, Phil Rosen, began in the day of the silent movies and was close to the end of his career when he made Step by Step. The screenwriter for the film was noted mystery writer Stuart Palmer, author of the Miss Withers detective novels. […]