Sun 17 Feb 2013
Reviewed by Geoff Bradley: VAL McDERMID – A Place of Execution (Book and TV Adaptation).
Posted by Steve under Reviews , TV mysteries[4] Comments
VAL McDERMID – A Place of Execution. Collins, UK, hardcover, 1999; paperback, 2000. St. Martin’s, US, hardcover, 2000; paperback, 2001.
A PLACE OF EXECUTION. ITV, UK; 3 x 60m episodes: 22 Sept, 29 Sept, 6 Oct 2008. PBS, US, November 1 & 8, 2009. Lee Ingleby, Emma Cunniffe, Philip Jackson, Juliet Stevenson, Elizabeth Day, Tony Maudsley, Greg Wise, Poppy Goodburn, Mikey North, Danny Tennant. Based on the novel by Val McDermid. Director: Daniel Percival.
In 1963, when the Manchester police are investigating the first disappearances caused by the real-life Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, a 13-year-old girl goes missing from her small isolated Derbyshire village.
On hand when the call comes in is Detective Inspector George Martin, a man fast-tracked for promotion under the new graduate recruitment scheme. He becomes rather obsessed with the search for the missing girl, coordinating unsuccessful searches and then reacting with diligence when evidence starts to filter in slowly over the next few weeks.
When an arrest is made, we follow the accumulation of evidence and then the formality of the trial and verdict. This takes us through almost 400 of the 550 pages in the paperback that I read.
We then forward to the present day (or, at least, to 1998, when the book was written) and the story of Catherine Heathcote, a journalist who has taken time off to write a book about the about the case, co-operating with the now retired George Martin. With the book nearly finished, she receives a letter from him saying that he was withdrawing from the project ad insisting that she abandon it.
Catherine now has to investigate the reasons why and this takes up the final part of the book.
This is a very slow paced but enjoyable and rewarding book (after 200 pages very little has happened but I was enthralled and still reading enthusiastically).
However I have to say that it was very well written and I thoroughly enjoyed the reading of it. (It was short-listed for the Gold Dagger in 1999 and the Edgar in 2001, and won the Anthony and Macavity Awards for that year.)
I delayed watching the television adaptation of the novel (three one-hour parts, less adverts) because I wanted to read the book first. (It’s an awful dilemma because, as you all know, you gain the knowledge from one which can dilute the pleasure of the other, no matter which you experience – unless of course you leave a small gap, a few weeks seems to sufficient nowadays for me, in which case all knowledge of the original will be forgotten.)
This is a superior production and one I would recommend. Some changes are made to the original. The journalist is now preparing a television piece (which gives her people to speak to: a televisual necessity since thoughts are difficult to get across) and is given a difficult teenage daughter with which to contend. Also many of the characters of the book are jettisoned and the action is streamlined (again necessary or the production would last much longer than the allotted 2½ hours or so).
The switch between the 1963 scenes and the present day is well handled and well cast with corresponding actors chosen to portray the same actors in the differing eras.
The coincidence I complained of in the book is eliminated but, unfortunately, another much more unacceptable coincidence is added to close the production. This is not enough to ruin what is an enjoyable adaptation, but it would have been better if it not been added.
February 18th, 2013 at 10:26 am
My preference also, given the choice, is to read (or watch) the original first. Sometimes the original is not so easily found; other times it is already well known that the adaptation is the better creation, and I’ll go with that and skip the original.
In this case, and this is just me, I don’t read books or watch movies/TV shows in which children are killed or in jeopardy, even if they’re as good as Geoff says this one is (or both are).
I also don’t read books with serial killers in them. I suppose I miss a lot of good reading, or movie/TV watching, but then again, there’s a lot of stuff I know I do want to read or watch, and unless I speed up my intake, I know I never will.
February 18th, 2013 at 6:15 pm
Since someone was wondering, I wasn’t suggesting that A PLACE OF EXECUTION has a serial killer in it, and without giving away any of the plot (we hope) Geoff assures me that it doesn’t.
February 19th, 2013 at 7:55 am
Steve, this was one of the best mysteries written in the 1990’s and certainly had my vote as the best of the year. The adaptation was good but the book was clearly superior in every way.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:27 pm
The movie had been nagging at me from my Netflix screen for months, but for some reason I wasn’t interested. On the strength of this review, though, I got the book and WOW is it good. The setting, the characters, the story – really packs a wallop. Then I went on to the BBC film. It was good, but not great, I thought. I’m not sure why they changed the ‘tec’s name but that’s minor. I did like the actors younger and older chosen for that part. I think I know what “coincidence” you’re talking about and I too thought it was entirely unnecessary. Had they followed the book, there was much more impact in that denouement than the movie offered, I thought. And I applaud the director for handling a very touchy theme adroitly and non-exploitatively.
Thanks for featuring these, I enjoyed them a lot.