Mon 3 Feb 2014
Archived Review: A. FIELDING – The Net Around Joan Ingilby.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[5] Comments
A. FIELDING – The Net Around Joan Ingilby. Collins Crime Club, UK, hardcover, 1928. Alfred A. Knopf, US, hardcover, 1928.
According to a huge amount of research done by John Herrington, [FOOTNOTE] A. Fielding was in reality Dorothy Feilding, who between 1924 and 1938 was the author of 24 detective novels, an absolute terrific pace, with one last book appearing in 1944.
Her primary character is Chief Inspector Pointer, who did not appear in all of them, and who, on the basis of the two books read so far, does not always appear in the ones he does until a certain distance into the story. He’s from Scotland Yard, and the local police do not always see fit to call in them in right away. (I am hedging here, trying not to tell you more than you should know, and as soon as I tell you that, I know that that’s telling you too much in and of itself.)
But all digressions aside, let me tell you about this one, which is a doozie and a half, as my mother (or was it my grandmother) used to say. In Chapter One, there’s no detective story or mystery thriller in sight. On board ship, where such chance meetings often take place, just before landing, journalist Martin Blair meets the fairy princess of his dreams, briefly but most magically, yet with no likelihood of ever seeing her again.
Chapter Two. After fashioning a successful career for himself, Blair comes across a strange but apparently accidental death, that of a woman who took refuge in a shed near a outdoor charcoal burning facility and was later found asphyxiated by the fumes. Investigating further on his own, Blair comes to the conclusion that foul play was involved, and he writes the story up for his newspaper, complete with an all-but-accusation of the guilty party, Miss Joan Ingilby, the missing governess of the dead woman’s child.
Well, I suppose you know what comes next. Joan Ingilby and his fairy princess are one and the same, and while Blair desperately tries to take back his accusation, his recital of the facts is all too convincing, and Joan must go into hiding while Blair tries to make amends and catch the real killer.
There may be a “first†involved here. Can you think of any other story in which an accused murderer comes back into the story disguised as her older sister in order to help in the investigation?
Here’s a description of Joan’s first encounter with Chief Inspector Pointer, taken from page 137:
She tingled with excitement. Would he suspect her? Would he help her? This brown-faced man with the pleasant but very enigmatic grey eyes.
Pointer will need all the strength that is suggested in this passage. The trail leads to France, and to Marseilles in particular, to a den of iniquity there never seen in the likes of Innes, Christie or Carr. Kidnappings, last minute escapes, recaptures, underground passages and more – unlike anything I have read in more normal fiction in many a day. (Maybe I’ve been reading the wrong stuff. This was great.)
Not so great, though, were the many lapses in story-telling continuity. In the early going, characters appear only as they are needed, even though they had to have been on the scene all along. One truly remarkable feat of physical genius occurs around page 42. Joan is in Blair’s apartment, coming to plead her case to him after the story he wrote. When a policeman comes to the door, Joan ducks into Blair’s bedroom, unready to give herself up. Fearful of the maid’s impending arrival, Blair tries to distract Police-Inspector Armstrong, to no avail. Two pages later, there is a knock on his outer door. It is Joan, disguised as her sister, ready to confront the law, heavy on her trail. But how? It is never explained.
There are parts of this tale, however, which concern matters mysterical and are equally amazing, and once explained, may very well take your breath away. It did mine, and for more reasons than one – one being pure audacity, and another – well, you’ll have to read this one for yourself.
Do I have room for another quote? I think so. From pages 84 and 85, where Pointer is telling Blair something about his philosophy of solving criminal cases:
FOOTNOTE: Most of this research was done after this review was written, and this current first paragraph replaces several earlier ones dealing with what was known about A. Fielding in 2004. Check out this earlier post on this blog, and this review on Curt Evans’ blog, in the course of which he discusses the life of the author in much detail.
February 3rd, 2014 at 7:31 pm
Thank you for posting this review Whatever merit the book may have pales , for me, in comparison to the Agatha Christie connection. For further research.
February 3rd, 2014 at 8:53 pm
Great piece of scholarship, and as Barry points out a worthy one.
It does sound though as if Fielding may have been from the humdrum school.
February 4th, 2014 at 12:26 am
I once had a copy of this book (with the dust jacket, no scan sadly), where a former owner had written “very bad” or something like that in it. Sounds like she went something of the thriller route with this one.
Fielding is a frustrating writer. I find her books in the 1920s and 1930s often do have — unlike those of, say, our beloved Carolyn Wells — real ingenuity, but there can also be a slovenliness about them, like the author wrote in great haste. The latter problem seems to become more pronounced in the 1930s, when her output increased.
Over at GAD and here at Mystery*File some of us have been quite vexed for some years now with the A. Fielding mystery. I hope someone makes another breakthrough. That she appears to have lived down the street from Agatha Christie in the 1930s I find very neat.
February 4th, 2014 at 10:33 am
There are recent reviews of two other Fielding novels on THE PASSING TRAMP blog.
February 4th, 2014 at 11:56 am
Yes, indeed. Besides the Joan Ingilby book, Curt has also reviewed — in depth! — the following pair of Fielding’s:
The Eames Erskine Case
http://thepassingtramp.blogspot.com/2014/01/a-fine-croftster-fielding-eames-erskine.html
and
The Case of the Two Pearl Necklaces
http://thepassingtramp.blogspot.com/2014/01/pearls-are-nuisance-case-of-two-pearl.html
Highly recommended!!