Sat 13 Sep 2014
A Review by David Vineyard: ARTHUR GASK – The Vengeance of Gilbert Larose.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[15] Comments
ARTHUR GASK – The Vengeance of Gilbert Larose. Herbert Jenkins, UK, hardcover, 1939. No US publication. First published in The Advertiser, Adelaide, S.A. in serial form commencing Wednesday 27 September, 1939. Available online at Project Gutenberg Australia.
Some of you may recall a few years back when I uncovered the career of Australian pulp novelist Paul Savoy and his main character Blackie Savoy. Let us just say that the provenance for Arthur Gask and Gilbert Larose is much better.
Before Arthur Upfield and Bony, Australia’s best know sleuth, was Gilbert Larose, the creation of Arthur Gask, a prolific and successful writer whose career ran from the 1920‘s until 1951.
While his novels are detective stories they are much closer to Edgar Wallace than Agatha Christie with the redoubtable Larose: brilliant, testy, a master of disguise, but also vulnerable and sometimes wrong. He’s no Holmes though. He’s a happily married man, and in several books he himself is on the run from police. Like Upfield’s half=aboriginal Bony, there is more than a touch of adventure that creeps into Larose’s adventures.
Most of the Larose novels I have read open in thriller country, but end in the courtroom. In more than one of them law gets a close shave in lieu of justice and Larose has a liberal attitude towards his official duties. I suppose being a fugitive from them would do that.
The books take place in Australia or in England where Scotland Yard is always happy to have the great Larose on hand.
I’ve chosen The Vengeance of Gilbert Larose because H. G. Wells highly praised this one on its appearance in the UK. Bertrand Russell was also a fan and at age 78 made the effort to meet the 81 year old Gask.
Gask was London born and moved with his bride in 1920 to Adelaide where he practiced dentistry. In 1921 he paid to have his first book published, The Secret of the Sandhills, and it was an immediate success. Into his eighties he was producing two 80.000 word novels a year and died writing one.
That much is covered in Wikipedia.
Gilbert Larose first appeared in 1926 in Cloud the Smiter (great title) and last in 1952 in Crime Upon Crime. Neither he nor Gask changed a lot over that time, but why argue with a winning formula.
In Vengeance of Gilbert Larose our hero’s task is nothing less than preventing a dictator from undermining British morale on the eve of War. Of course the real thing caught up with Gask and Larose before the book began serialization, but that means little. Larose who, as the newspaper says ‘tempers justice with expediency,’ is up to the task.
We open with a certain dictator living high on a mountain eyrie discussing events with a certain Von Ravenham, principally the problem of Lord Michael and Sir Howard Wake, influential men who have gone on to call the country an ‘insane asylum’ in print. Something must be done about this.
The deadline is before Lord Michael can sail for America and muddle the mind of the Americans as well. Add to this the Dictator himself has been studying English and plans to shave his mustache and go to England himself to supervise.
All Geoffrey Household tried to do in Rogue Male was kill him.
And we’re off.
Now there would seem to be no possible connection between the great autocrat of that lonely building upon the mountainside and an insignificant looking little convict in a prison in far off England. Yet, at that very moment Fate, like a malignant spider, was starting to weave a web whose threads were destined ultimately to entangle them both. (Prose like this is enough to make you reconsider Wells and Russell both.)
The insignificant little convict is named Bracegirdle, and he has just done six years for poaching. He’s a good enough sort and the Governor of the prison asks Gilbert Larose to give him a hand if he can. Meanwhile in Essex, Pellew and Royne are running a wine distribution business but it isn’t their first concern. As Von Ravenham shows up on their doorstep they are in a minor pickle and forced to hire a local mechanic, someone they can keep quiet and control — like a former convict. It gets worse when Von Ravenham reveals he knows they are using the business as a front for a criminal enterprise.
But he will keep quiet if they are willing to ‘shoot, stab, and strangle’ two men for him.
I love it when a plan comes together.
Now, literally, Chapter 2.
Things get more complicated for Pellew and Royne as they wait for a shipment of cocaine to arrive from a tramp steamer. They rescue a swimmer from the sea, and fear drawing to much attention if they drown him.
Meanwhile as they whisper desperately, the half-drowned man’s keen ears pick up details. His papers say he is Kenneth Bracegirdle, a ticket of leave (ex-convict) man who just happens to be what they need, a mechanic.
You’re getting ahead of me. Ex-convicts don’t have keen ears do they? But Gilbert Larose does.
Larose overhears them proposing murder, but who? In the meantime he gets the job and waits.
I can’t help wondering here if Upfield read Gask, because this is the kind of thing Bony was always doing, though in much better written stories.
Larose plays at a dangerous game, half blackmailing them to keep from being silenced while trying to get the goods on them. How long can he keep these balls in the air?
Pellew and Royne are busy types, they are also selling secret plans to the ‘Japs.’
Oh what tangled … Oh, skip it.
Eventually Pellew and Royne are arrested, and Larose ends up posing as Pellew’s brother Nicholas Bent for Von Ravenham, a replacement in that little business of shooting, stabbing, and strangling …
Before it is over Larose narrowly escapes torture, aids a young lady, evades a ticking bomb, and as Gask sums it up.
Household’s hero just went back to hunt him.
Okay, it’s rah rah, pre-war spirit lifting, and it is hardly deathless prose. Admittedly it is much closer to my Paul Savoy than I ever expected to find — but it is fun, harmless, and a few of the mysteries aren’t bad. Gask can write when he chooses to, and the person you think is Larose
isn’t always who you thought.
Granted coincidence and dumb luck play too great a role in the game, and it is hard to see Larose as a great detective as his detective work tends to be the being in the right place at the right time sort, and the few deductions he makes could only come about because Gask let him read the manuscript ahead of time. Gask and everyone else tell you he is a great detective, so he must be one, I’m just not sure on what basis.
I’ve enjoyed the ones I read, though. If it is not great writing, it is pleasant almost nostalgic bad writing. It’s the equivalent of discovering a pulp detective you never knew about. Even better these are free to download, and very few of his books are unavailable in that form.
For all that these are fast, fun reads, a step above Sexton Blake and below Edgar Wallace and George Goodchild. They aren’t dull, and Larose does grow on you in time.
As an Upfield fan I found it especially interesting, because Bony and Larose operate very much alike and Bony too has an expedient view of justice, and that at least is a sign of the great detective.
September 13th, 2014 at 4:52 pm
I hate to make comparisons between authors, but from the little I know about each of the them, I would have to say that Gask is a better writer than Paul Savoy.
Over the years I’ve accumulated maybe three or four books by Arthur Gask, but never got around to reading any of them. I don’t think any of them are ones with Gilbert Larose, but I could be wrong about that.
I’m intrigued now, though. I may have to do some digging in the garage where the Gasks are kept. At least that’s where I think they should be.
September 13th, 2014 at 10:49 pm
Gask is considerably better than Savoy, but still closer than I could have imagined.
As for bad writing Steve, I hope you will get rid of that stray ‘occur’ at the end of ‘ahead of time’ I swear my laptop has gremlins because I never wrote a sentence that bad in my life.
I found the others better than this, and less pulpy. THE SHADOW OF GILBERT LAROSE has a man who thinks he has committed a murder at large stumbling into the real killers and features some good Upfield like scenes in the outback, and no less than two mysterious good guys — only one of which is Larose, and ends in a decent courtroom bit and some of Larose better deductions. THE HOUSE WITH THE HIGH WALL, THE NIGHT OF THE STORM, THE HOUSE ON THE FENS, and HIS PREY WAS MAN are all worth a read. The twist that the primary character in SHADOW believes he is guilty for most of the book and is trying to redeem himself as well as elude the police is tricky and Gask doesn’t completely pull it off, but he does it much better than you might expect and where reality gets a bit bent out of shape it is always a minor matter that won’t kill most readers enjoyment.
Gask certainly deserves to be read despite some pulpy writing. The puzzles are interesting if not fair play and there are some surprises.
One thing of note in VENGEANCE that I didn’t really go into was the cocaine smuggling. That was an almost obsessive theme in British thriller fiction from the twenties well into the early war years. It showed up equally in thrillers and Golden Age detective fiction (John Rhode used it under at least two of his pseudonyms). With the exception of evil armaments manufacturers and various poison gases (Charteris THE LAST HERO, Sapper THE FINAL ROUND)with cocaine smuggling they are the three great themes of twenties thrillers.
To give Gask credit that he well deserves the quality of his books never fell off with age. With a few exceptions it is hard to tell when one of his books was written, the late books have some of the same energy of the early ones. I can see what Wells and Russell saw in his work and why Russell might want to meet the author of old favorites.
Larose is an interesting sleuth as well. He has elements of Holmes as well as J.G. Reeder. He’s as much a justice figure as a detective but does some good detective work in some books. Certainly Gask is never dull, you can’t say he writes in the humdrum tradition, though a little humdrum might improve a few of the better detective stories.
Gask lacks the social and racial aspect of Upfield, Larose is much less a rounded character than Bony, he isn’t as familiar with the outback and its lore and environs, and his secondary characters are seldom as well developed, but Upfield’s early pre Bony tales read a good deal like Gask and Larose could almost be a broad outline for Bony’s adventures.
I don’t think Upfield’s first book appeared until nine or ten years after Gask and four or so after Larose so it is quite possible he read Gask and took some influence from him — at least from the Australian ones.
September 13th, 2014 at 11:30 pm
I’ve cleaned up that sentence, David. I don’t know how I didn’t spot that faulty “occur” myself. I usually proofread better than that.
Not having read Gask, as I recall, I can’t speak to any connection between his work and Upfield’s, but even the possibility is intriguing.
September 13th, 2014 at 11:34 pm
PS. David’s article on Paul Savoy appeared over four years ago now, as long time readers of this blog will surely recall. If you’ve reading these posts more recently than that, be sure to follow that link in the first paragraph of this review. You’ll be sure to thank me, and David, too.
September 14th, 2014 at 6:16 pm
Weirdly, one seemingly cannot find any references on the Internet to Blackie Savoy, other than David’s articles.
Does this guy really exist?
Am I just searching badly?
September 14th, 2014 at 6:26 pm
Mike
Look at the date it was originally posted.
September 14th, 2014 at 6:30 pm
I can’t find a posting date!
September 14th, 2014 at 7:22 pm
David was in error. The date he was thinking of was the day I made an announcement on this blog that his article was ready for viewing on the main M*F website:
ANNOUNCING: The Adventures of Blackie Savoy, by David L. Vineyard.
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=1937
Date: Thu 1 Apr 2010
September 14th, 2014 at 7:27 pm
PS. David’s review of “Black Moon of the Mummy,” by Paul Savoy, can be found here:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=1961
September 14th, 2014 at 7:37 pm
Another Gask book worth a look for mystery aficionados is Gentlemen of Crime. In plotting it’s more thriller than mystery, with Larose and several other illustrious sleuths tracking down an extortion ring victimizing an American millionaire–but the team of sleuths is composed of take-offs on various famed detective-story characters. The Lord Peter Wimsey (Lord Victor Hume) and Dr. Thorndyke (Dr. Crittenden) analogues get short shrift (and get killed off), but the imitations of Arsene Lupin (Rafael Croupin), Sherlock Holmes (Naughton Jones), and Inspector Hanaud (Inspector Vallon), are major players in the story, and are quite vividly characterized. Croupin’s continual impish teasing of the egotistical Jones is particularly enjoyable.
September 15th, 2014 at 8:08 am
Thanks for telling us about this one,Daniel. Luckily it’s one of a handful of Gask’s that have been reprinted in US editions (Macaulay, 1933). I’ve just ordered an ex-library copy for twelve dollars and change. Not bad for a book over 80 years old!
September 15th, 2014 at 2:53 pm
Thanks Daniel, I’ll keep a look out for that one. Gask can write though he sometimes relies too much on pulp prose and early 20th century literary conventions of the ‘little did they know’ type. Likely a result of being written as newspaper serials but badly in need of an editors blue pencil.
I can see where Larose and Gask would favor Lupin, Holmes, and Hanaud. Does this pre date Bruce’s A CASE FOR THREE DETECTIVES?
September 15th, 2014 at 8:51 pm
Yes; Gentlemen of Crime was published in 1932, Case for Three Detectives in 1936.
September 16th, 2014 at 5:25 pm
Thanks Daniel.
GENTLEMEN OF CRIME is available at Project Gutenberg Australia in three formats for download with the cover which is interesting.
Since this predates Bruce and Gask was well read in England you have to wonder. Parody and satire were nothing new in the genre when either was written, but these two do rub shoulders a bit.
I’m not suggesting anything more than inspiration, I certainly don’t see Bruce copying Gask, but you have to wonder if it might have inspired the idea for the latter work. The time period is certainly right.
June 22nd, 2022 at 7:49 am
Having recently bought a few Arthur Gask books cheaply, I thought I’d read one, having never read him before. The first one I tried Judgment of Larose was really quite good. And if that sounds like damning with faint praise it was let down a little by the ending, with having more than one person involved in the crime. As a point of interest the Sherlock Holmes ‘clone’ Naughton Jones appears briefly in this one as he does in some other Larose books. On the evidence of the two books by Gask I’ve read he is certainly a better writer than George Goodchild, and much better than the woeful Robin Forsthye and the unreadable Brian Flynn, I’ve tried two of his books and not managed to past the third chapter. Flynn might have been able to come up with clever plots but I agree with Barzun & Taylor who said of one of his books that it was ‘straight tripe and savourless’.