Tue 16 Sep 2014
A Science Fiction Review: JOHN RACKHAM – Dark Planet.
Posted by Steve under Reviews , Science Fiction & Fantasy[18] Comments
JOHN RACKHAM – Dark Planet. Ace Double 13805, paperback original, 1971. Published back to back with The Herod Men, by Nick Kamin. Cover art by Jack Gaughan.
I don’t read nearly as much science fiction as I used to. I don’t care for fantasy, except on occasion the humorous kind. I’m not interested in military science fiction, even though the first three Star Wars movies were a lot of fun. I don’t like long series of books in the same world or universe, especially the big fat thick ones. I know if I ever start one, either I’ll never finish or (wonder of wonders) it is what I’m looking for and it sucks all of the reading time out of my day.
I thought I’d like the new fad, or at least I think it is, of steampunk SF and fantasy — the kind that takes place in Victorian times — but I quickly discovered that a little bit of gaslights, diesel-powered zeppelins and intricately machined robots goes a long way. (If I’m mischaracterizing the genre, I assume someone will let me know, gently, of course.)
I assumed for a while that, even no one’s publishing it, what I like is good old-fashioned space opera, until I tried to read one of E. E. “Doc” Smith’s old Lensman series. No for me, not any more, not stickboard characters like this. Maybe I’m too old for science fiction, both the current variety and last century’s.
Or maybe not. Coming across a duplicate copy of one of Ace’s well-remembered and long-lost Ace Doubles, I gave it a try, and while Dark Planet showed its roots far too clearly, it was a lot of fun to read. I liked it. It’s my era of Science Fiction, circa 1966-72, when I wasn’t yet 30 but had started my teaching career and life was as fine as it could be. Maybe everyone has their own particular niche in terms of favorite reading material, and could it be that I’ve only been reading the Wrong Stuff?
Stephen Query is the protagonist in this one. He’s a misfit in the world of humanity in which he is forced to live. He doesn’t belong. He walks to the beat of a different drummer. He’s been forced out of the Space Service, where he thought he’d found a home, and sentenced to a life of drudgery and loneliness on a world with an atmosphere so noxious that it would dissolve the clothing right off your back. Sentenced there unjustly for disobeying a high-ranking officer’s direct orders. A world that’s fit only as a stopping-off and refitting station for spaceships on their way to fight in another part of the galaxy.
But loneliness he doesn’t mind, and it comes with some dismay to learn that he has been pardoned and is forcibly ordered to ship out and off to war. But the ship is sabotaged, and he and the Admiral and the Admiral’s daughter are forced to make a crash landing on the planet.
The Admiral’s daughter has one outstanding feature, according to the author, and that is her bosom. Her breasts are mentioned with obvious admiration several times, and on a planet where clothing dissolves, along with all other non-living material, we think — or at least I did — we have an inkling where this is going.
Wrong. It turns out that the world, previously unexplored, is inhabited. Not only by the people who eventually rescue the unlucky trio, but there are also sentient beings on the upper levels of the planet. Not only that, but only Query can communicate with them, being a human of other talents, and not only mentally and emphatically, but in a (shall we say) in a more sensual way, or so I gathered — since we the readers do not have the same talents, but need to be given hints at times as to what is transpiring.
Very reminiscent, I thought, of novels of the late 40s, by authors such as Henry Kuttner, in only a slightly upgraded and a bit more sophisticated telling, complete with happy ending.
But the most enjoyable aspect of this short novel (just over 100 pages, but of small print) is that I both did and didn’t know exactly where the novel was going. Not Hugo-winning material at all, in any year, don’t get me wrong about that, but this fit the bill at exactly the time I wanted to read it. Good stuff!
September 16th, 2014 at 9:24 pm
In about 1966 I came back to SF after having not read any for about 5 years. I still read some, though not very much. My feelings about current SF are pretty much in line with yours. I like the older stuff much more. Warm up the geezer bus.
September 16th, 2014 at 10:05 pm
We’re very much alike, Bill.
September 17th, 2014 at 2:15 pm
I do read modern space opera by Alistair Reynolds and Iain Banks, much less militant and right wing than the American breed. but I too recall the era fondly. The big names, but others like Rackham, Edmond Cooper, William Tenn, Daniel Galouye … you could still pen a short succinct sf novel then, just long enough to do a bit of world building and introduce a few good ideas. Silverberg and Brunner were still turning out those kind of books and bestseller bloat had yet to set in.
I think there are a few Rackham’s available free online as well as Philip High and Andre Norton. Sort of the future past, but still worth our time.
September 17th, 2014 at 3:05 pm
All names of authors I’ve read and enjoyed, David, with the same caveat re Brunner and Silverberg. And there was a point beyond which I found Norton unreadable, but her early ones were fine indeed.
September 17th, 2014 at 8:13 pm
Try the ‘John Grimes’ series by A. Bertham Chandler. A lot of them also appeared in those Ace Doubles. Kind of like naval war adventures by the likes of C.S. Forester or Philip McCuthan, but in space. Chandler had been a merchant marine captain and adapts his experiences to SF.
September 17th, 2014 at 8:27 pm
A good suggestion, Matt. I read quite a few of the Grimes books, but not being much of a fan of naval fiction, my interest waned and I eventually stopped. Maybe it’s time to try another. I think some publisher, Baen perhaps, has been reprinting them.
September 17th, 2014 at 10:26 pm
Your first paragraph describes me exactly. I used to only read SF but nowadays nothing sounds interesting.
September 17th, 2014 at 11:11 pm
Brian, I’m willing to wager that you’re the same age as Bill Crider and I are.
September 18th, 2014 at 3:50 am
Is there still room on the geezer bus? I tend to find that any sci-fi stuff that I read was published decades ago. Modern day books are often stretched far too thinly over endless volumes. Oh, for the days when authors were allowed to write books that didn’t have to double up as door-stops!
Erio Frank Russell wrote stuff like MEN, MACHINES AND MARTIANS in the 40s and 50s, and looking at it now you can plainly see the inspiration for stuff like STAR TREK, with its multinational space-crew uncovering weird life-forms on distant planets. Equally, I read a lot of stuff by E C Tubb some years ago. The DUMAREST saga from the 60s/70s about someone trying to find the mythical planet Earth whilst being pursued by robot creatures (this came before BATTLESTAR GALACTICA) was good, solid, old-fashioned SF. His F.A.T.E series (written under the pseudonym Gregory Kern) is space/opera meets Bond. When publishers like NEL bellied up in the early 2000s, they took a lot of stuff like this with them–the not quite respectable, old-fashioned stuff.
September 18th, 2014 at 2:30 pm
As for modern sf/fantasy, my favorite still living sf author is John Scalzi (THE OLD MAN WAR), for fantasy is Jasper Fforde (Thursday Next), for pulp sf series is Peter David (STAR TREK: NEW FRONTIER).
I miss Douglas Adams, Kage Baker and Detective Inspector Chen (discontinued series by Liz Williams).
I wish I had the time to read my books by Seanan McGuire and Michael Moorcock.
I still look forward to the next DISCWORLD book by Terry Pratchett. And any of the British book series based on Professor Bernice Summerfield (spin-off of Doctor Who book series).
The best steampunk series I have found is the graphic novel/webcomic GIRL GENIUS by Phil and Kaja Foglio.
September 18th, 2014 at 4:10 pm
I miss Adams and Baker too and love Jasper Fforde. One of the few modern sf writers I still follow is Robert Charles Wilson.
Names from the past, many of those previously mentioned (and I agree about Norton as well), Marion Zimmer Bradley before she was ‘discovered.’ Much if not all of the Darkover series and Chandler’s Grimes/Rim series as well as Norton’s early works were available as free downloads online. Grimes is very mindful of STAR TREK since Roddenberry too was influenced by Horatio Hornblower and Forester (there used to be Forester and Georgette Heyer rooms at SF conventions for their world building skills.
I loved Fred Hoyle, Anderson, Dickson, the whole Campbell crowd, Stephen Marlowe/Milton Lesser’s Johnny Havoc tales, Mack Reynolds, Leiber, Farmer, Laumer.
Save for some of the British space opera writers I find most modern sf difficult to get into. L.E. Moseditt writes well, but you have to be so careful its not part of a multi volume series that collected together would break down an elephant. That and the writing has deteriorated overall.
Just today I put aside a book I was looking at when I opened a page and found the writer, a bestseller, describing how her hero would ‘have to run real fast.’ In dialogue that would be fine, but this was not dialogue. Why would anyone want to read a writer that ignorant of simple syntax and grammar?
You can download ELEMENTS OF STYLE free online, and some people need to.
September 18th, 2014 at 6:47 pm
David, I have more problems with the grammatical style of the past than the modern version. Granted I am an anarchist when it comes to the English language. I belong to the group that believes there is only one rule, write or speak so your point is clear to others. Screw the semicolon!
ELEMENTS OF STYLE is a bit dull in parts and the ending is predictable. I prefer THE LEXICOGRAPHER’S DILEMMA by Jack Lynch that deals with the history of the English language and how the “rules” have changed and continue to change.
September 19th, 2014 at 10:34 am
Like David, I’m a fan of Alastair Reynolds. Also, Nick Asher. The Brits seem to have space opera down cold. Contemporary SF isn’t always my cup of tea. I just panned ANCILLARY JUSTICE which won all sorts of awards. Brunner and Silverberg wrote so much stuff, I’m still working my way through all their works.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:24 am
Nothing Freudian about that cover…
September 19th, 2014 at 11:44 am
I have and have read this, and liked it. there were a lot of similar things written in that period but Laumer, Anderson, Fyfe, Dickson, many others.
I think the best current space opera is by James S.A. Corey, The Expanse. Yes, it’s a series of thick books, but not a to of wasted words, great world building and characters. Levathan Wakes is the first book.
September 19th, 2014 at 11:53 am
Richard
I’ve been intimidated by its size, and the rest of the books in the series. but I’m in the process of reading Levathan Wakes right now. I haven’t gotten too far yet, but what I’ve read I’ve enjoyed. With so many books calling me by name, I kind of wonder how long it will take me to get through it, if at all. I’ve enjoyed one of Iain Banks’ books a while ago too, but I put it down on my night table beside my bed, and haven’t opened it since. I think I’m afraid I will have to start all over again, from the beginning, if I do.
September 19th, 2014 at 7:06 pm
Steve
Banks is brilliant, but not an easy writer. I love his works and even I have to hold a gun to my head to start one at times.
If you want to try Reynolds, mystery fans will find CENTURY RAIN a good place to start since it is both a wide ranging mind expanding space opera and the story of a jazz musician/private eye in a Paris trapped in time and key to the whole business.
The Scots Reynolds is for my money far and away the best of the Brit space opera writers though Peter Hamilton and Asher are both very good as well. Reynolds in particular is highly readable and makes the going on long books much easier.
Do try CENTURY RAIN though, it isn’t often you encounter a hardboiled hard science mind expanding space opera.
September 19th, 2014 at 9:53 pm
Michael
The best of ELEMENTS OF STYLE is that it is short, to the point, and towards the end has the best advice I ever got as a writer, first know the rules and then you can break all of them.
I agree that the formal and stately grammar of the past can be difficult, but since punctuation is the most important part of the impact of words I can’t agree about semi colons and such. Poor grammar kills the impact of words.
WE, the people of the United States …
Doesn’t have the same impact as
We the people of the United States ..
It’s just a comma, but an important one.
When in the course of human events … is more powerful than When, in the course of human events …
As any of the hard boiled writers could tell you, He said: has more impact than ,he said. Short sentences can add incredible impact, and at some point incomplete sentences not only become annoying they detract from the narrative. In recent years I keep running into writers who put random commas where they aren’t needed or change the meaning of what they write.
I’ll do whatever it takes to make the story work and to hell with the rules of grammar, but I know when I am breaking them.
I just find ELEMENTS useful because it is short, humorous, and aimed at professionals in its practical approach.
Anarchy is fine, I’m not so fond of chaos.
Lynch’s book is fine, but I prefer the 95 page ELEMENTS as my bible.