Thu 9 Oct 2014
Walter Albert on WILLIAM POWELL.
Posted by Steve under Movie stars & directors , Mystery movies , Reviews[10] Comments
by Walter Albert
In 1935 and 1936, William Powell followed his 1934 starring role in MGM’s The Thin Man with two RKO comedy-mysteries, Star of Midnight and The Ex-Mrs. Bradford, both of them directed by Stephen Roberts.
In Bradford Jean Arthur is the ex-Mrs. Bradford who turns up at the beginning of the film to have physician Bradford (Powell) served a subpoena for non-payment of alimony; in Star, Ginger Rogers is Donna Manton, a social butterfly in love with lawyer Powell who claims to have more fun solving cases than trying them and whose friends consider him to be a combination of Charlie Chan, Philo Vance and the Sphinx.
Bradford is a racetrack mystery and Star a Broadway mystery, both versions of the classic form of amateur detective considered by less-than-bright homicide detectives to be a prime suspect in a murder case.
Bradford has the more original conclusion with the suspects invited to a meeting at which a film reveals the murderer’s identity, but Star is better paced and has some more polished acting in secondary roles, particularly by Vivian Oakland as a former girlfriend of Powell’s and Gene Lockhart as a somewhat unconventional butler who didn’t do it but is drafted for some ironic sleuthing.
Arthur and Rogers, both fine actress/comediennes, are delightful foils for Powell’s stylish drollery and each has at least one scene that is a standout: Arthur in a brilliant closing sequence and Rogers in a comic tum as she foils Oakland’s play for Powell.
Powell’s earliest appearance as an urbane amateur detective was in The Canary Murder Case, in which Jean Arthur also appeared, and by 1935 there was no more adept player of drawing-room comedy-mysteries.
The actor is probably no less accomplished in Bradford and Star than he is in The Thin Man, but it is certainly debatable whether, as William Everson maintains in The Detective in Film (Citadel, 1972), The Thin Man is “almost” equaled by the two lesser known movies.
The level of craftsmanship in all three of the films is very high, but I think that the decisive elements in the superiority of The Thin Man — and in its continuing popularity — are the inspired pairing of Myrna Loy, who matches Powell’s arch style with her own elegant delivery and movement, and first-rate scripting by Albert Goodrich and Frances Hackett, and directing by W.S. Van Dyck.
Script, direction, and performance come together in an extraordinary tour-de-force that climaxes the film. The wrapup party sequence in The Thin Man still dazzles as Powell delivers what is in effect an extended monologue and it is this perfectly timed scene, a classic example of the “cosy” mystery denouement, that, for me, makes The Thin Man the success that Bradford and Star achieve only in part.
Both actresses were on the verge of major stardom when they appeared with Powell. Loy would, of course, continue the role of Nora Charles in five sequels, and also appear in films like The Great Ziegfield, The Rains Came, The Best Years of Our Lives, and Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House.
The Thin Man is usually seen as the one in which Loy escaped type casting as an Oriental temptress — most notably as the daughter of Fu Manchu in The Mask of Fu Manchu (1932) — but non-Oriental roles in films like Love Me Tonight (1932), Topaze (1933) and Manhattan Melodrama (1934) suggest that her film roles were far more varied than they are usually thought to have been.
An oddity in the casting of Arthur is that she had played in three Fu Manchu films (in 1929 and 1930) and in the early thirties was better known as an actress in melodramas than as the star of comedy/dramas as she was subsequently to be.
By an equally ironic reversal, Rogers, after her dizzying success with Fred Astaire, would establish herself as a dramatic actress in the late thirties and forties, but with Astaire and with Powell she demonstrates an apparently natural comedic talent and a freshness that makes her performances with them among her most engaging.
[Almost eighty years] after their original release dates, The Thin Man and the two “forgotten” films, Star and Bradford, are entertainments that largely defy the passage of time. In addition, all three films — and one must add to the list James Whale’s brilliant 1935 baroque send-up of the drawing-room mystery, Remember Last Night? — are a tribute to the popularity of the amateur sleuth mystery in the 1930s and to the professional and artistic integrity of this genre.
The Thin Man gains some lustre in the context of related films but also should remind us that it operated out of a tradition that still gives pleasure for its wit and invention and, in particular, celebrates the career of one of the screen’s most distinguished player of amateur detectives, William Powell.
October 10th, 2014 at 2:59 am
Walter, you captured the charm of a good, fast-paced Powell film delightfully!
October 10th, 2014 at 9:54 am
Although the other two movies are extremely good and shouldn’t be missed by anyone reading this blog, the magical chemistry between William Powell and Myrna Loy simply can’t be topped.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:35 pm
William Powell remains my favorite actor. He had a range that is rarely mentioned. An actor who could make a villain likable (JEWEL ROBBERY), an actor who could make Philo Vance likable. A comedic actor who could handle the subtlety of MISTER ROBERTS, the broad comedy of DOUBLE WEDDING, and the satire of THE SENATOR WAS INDISCREET.
Powell was great in nearly everything he did, but Myrna Loy made the difference in THE THIN MAN films. She brought a human depth to the character of Nora Charles that was lacking in Hammett’s novel. It was the chemistry between Powell and Loy that audiences continued to pay for despite the screenwriters continued efforts to kill the series.
October 10th, 2014 at 1:42 pm
I agree with everyone so far on Powell, Loy, and the three films in question, but there is an irony, because Walter is quite right about Nick Charles behaving as an amateur sleuth in the film, which ironically is the exact opposite of Hammett’s point in the novel.
The final chapter of the novel where Nick describes his method of solving the case and how much guesswork was involved both there and in any prosecution is Hammett critiquing the entire amateur sleuth school, and quite sharply.
In the book Nick is a professional, and at the end when Nora complains it isn’t very satisfactory Nick has one of the genre’s most telling lines when he tells her murder seldom is satisfactory, “save maybe for the murderer and sometimes for the murdered.” That isn’t something you would hear from Philo Vance or at least the early Ellery Queen.
But in the film as Walter points out he is the cool amateur sleuth foxing the police and saving his brilliant deductions for the last done to a T. Other than his colorful associates, the disapproval of Nora’s family and his father, and his connections with the police the movies make little of Nick’s former career.
In the book Nick still thinks and acts like a pro. In the film (and it is a brilliant screenplay and directorial job) Nick delights in Nora’s reactions to his world, in the book he repeatedly warns her of what is coming. In the film Nick is suave, witty, brilliant, and delighted with Nora’s moxy. In the book he is all that but also cynical, tough, emotionally brutal, and wary Nora’s disenchantment with what he does will turn into a disenchantment with him.
The chemistry between Powell and Loy extended off screen as well. When Loy was named the number one female box office star Powell sent her spoiled grapes as a gift —sour grapes.
The whole married with murder trend lasted into the early fifties in film and print. The North’s, the Duluth’s, the Abbott’s, the McNeil’s, the Blake’s, the Troy’s, the Glass’s, it’s a long list and those are only highpoints. MGM tried repeatedly to repeat the formula with Joel and Garda Glass in three film, Van Heflin and Virginia Graham in one, and even Lord Peter and Harriet Vane. The North’s and the Troy’s both had screen, radio, and television outings, and the Duluth’s at least two movies (THE BLACK WIDOW and THE FEMALE FIENDS), but the North’s were the only couple that really came anywhere near as close.
I recently found the boxed set in perfect condition in a thrift shop and picked it up, enjoying the documentaries on Powell and Loy almost as much as the films themselves. It isn’t just remarkable how well they hold up, but in pristine prints how new and fresh they still feel.
Loy and Powell may have been playing detectives, but they stole every moment they were on screen.
October 11th, 2014 at 2:05 am
THE THIN MAN is one of my favourite films of all time, and the various sequels also rate highly with me. Powell and Loy somehow manage to be perfectly of their period, but also manage to be timeless. Especially in the first movie, they almost seem to hover outside of what is going on, somewhere between the viewer and the characters in the story. The script is partially responsible for this; Hackett and Goodrich totally understand the characters, as we can see from their screenplay “There is a warm understanding relationship between them. They are really crazy about one another, but undemonstrative and humourous in their companionship. They are tolerant, easy-going, taking drink for drink, and battling their way together with a dry humour”. But it’s also true that both actors are happy to make fun of themselves for the sake of the movie–look at Loy going face first onto the floor on her first appearance.
October 11th, 2014 at 3:19 am
Those who know Walter Albert and his wife Peggy are struck by their resemblance to Nick & Nora Charles.
October 11th, 2014 at 11:25 am
I believe the boxed set of the DVDs was in a recent Daedalus Books catalog for $19.98. I buy very few DVDs these days and depend on the local libraries for many of the films I want to watch. While the individual films are shelved alphabetically by title the documentary disc has been given a classification number and is in the biography section.
October 11th, 2014 at 12:15 pm
That’s the librarian in me talking. While I meant to say the Thin Man films are arranged in alphabetical order the documentary disc has been given a classification number and shelved under non-fiction (920 AL = for biography)
October 12th, 2014 at 10:49 pm
Oh, to explain my comment #3 about the writers trying to kill the series. Fans of the movie series should read the book RETURN OF THE THIN MAN. The book contains some great behind the scene stories about the making of the series including the writers wanting to go on to other projects gave the Charles a baby to kill the series. Such a move would have done in any similar movie series but people continued to want more THIN MAN movies.
October 13th, 2014 at 10:13 am
Michael,
The writers did kill the series — just the public kept going in ever diminishing numbers — until nothing was left.