Sat 11 Oct 2014
A Movie Review by David Vineyard: THE SMALL BACK ROOM (1949).
Posted by Steve under Films: Drama/Romance , Reviews , War Films[7] Comments
THE SMALL BACK ROOM. The Archers / British Lion Film Corporation, UK, 1949. Released in the US as Hour of Glory (1952). David Farrar, Kathleen Byron, Jack Hawkins, Michael Gough, Cyril Cusak, Leslie Banks, Sidney James, Robert Morley, Geoffrey Keen, Anthony Bushell, Renee Asherson. Based on the novel by Nigel Balchin. Cinematography: Christopher Challis. Written and directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressberger
The small back room of the title is in a once tony Park Lane building where myriad agencies including Professor Mair’s Research Section are situated. It’s just one of dozens of similar wartime sections belonging to no one in particular and answering to no one save a handful of civil service bureaucrats, politicians, and ministry officials, all maneuvering for influence, power, and glory. It’s 1943, and amidst the war petty politics and back stabbing still go on.
Boffin Sammy Rice (David Farrar, Black Narcissus, 300 Spartans, Meet Sexton Blake), is above all this. All he wants is to do his job, contribute, romance his girl Suzy (Kathleen Byron), and find some way to dull the pain and the shame caused by his tin leg.
He’s content to run his section and use Suzy as a vent for the anger his constant pain causes, which only makes him feel guilty and more useless. An expensive bottle of Scotch he keeps in his apartment in plain view is the one escape, not to kill the pain — neither it nor the dope the doctors give him will do that — but to make him forget. He has sworn not to touch it, though he does get drunk in a local pub owned by ex-boxer Knucksie (Sidney James). That bottle is a symbol of more than his pain, it also symbolizes the life he has bottled up in its smoky depths as well.
As the film opens Lt. Stewart (a young Michael Gough) of the bomb disposal unit arrives at Professor Mair’s section with a top secret problem soon assigned to Sammy; a booby trapped device being dropped by the Germans that has so far killed three boys and one man. It may be aimed at children to demoralize the British populace, but so far they haven’t found a live one to study, and when they do they need a man like Sammy to tell them how to handle it.
Meanwhile everything is complicated by Sammy’s problems, political back-fighting led by R. B. Waring (Jack Hawkins), the glad handing minister whose purview the section falls under, Mair’s incompetence, a soldier tech with a problematic wife (Cyril Cusak), and Suzy’s growing anger that Sammy will not stand up and fight for what he knows is right but hides behind his pain and that unopened bottle of Scotch.
The Archers of course were directors, producers, and screenwriters Michael Powell and Emeric Pressberger (The 49th Parallel, Black Narcissus, A Matter of Life and Death, The Red Shoes, to name a few classics) who adapted this version of the novel by Nigel Balchin (Mine Own Executioner and the screenplay for The Man Who Never Was), a British novelist whose works in the manner of Nevil Shute were both suspense novels as well as serious mainstream novels. This is one of his best remembered novels and a fine example of his abilities.
There’s an exceptional cast for this one, even in bit roles: Robert Morley, Geoffrey Keen, even Patrick Macnee gets a closeup if no dialogue, and Farrar, Byron, Gough, Hawkins, Cussak as a stuttering technician, Anthony Bushell as a bomb disposal officer, and Renee Asherson as a corporal assigned as stenographer to a bomb disposal unit are all outstanding. Asherson has a fine scene where she reads the last instructions dictated from the site where an officer was killed trying to defuse the bomb to Farrar who will be the next man to attempt it. It’s a thousand times more effective than filming the scene itself could have been.
Christopher Challis’s cinematography must be mentioned as well; the location shots capture much of the wildness of some of the remote regions the booby-trapped devices carry Sammy and Stewart to, as well as the claustrophobia of crowded pubs and nightclubs with blacked out lights, tiny labs in the small back rooms of the title, and without the usual scenes in bomb shelters or footage of burning London, sketching in the aura of wartime England subtly. As it likely was for most ordinary people in London and the rest of the country, the war is always a presence even when it isn’t at the forefront.
One outstanding sequence in the film is a surrealistic waking nightmare as Sammy waits for Suzy, the only person who can distract him from his pain, and must battle not only his pain, but the attraction of the bottle. As the clock ticks maddeningly, his pills fail him, and the bottle looms larger and larger until he even sees its outline in the pattern of the wallpaper, he breaks down.
It’s a nerve-wracking scene, and wrenching to watch the otherwise taciturn and stoic Farrar deteriorate before your eyes. It’s as uncomfortable as anything in The Lost Weekend and as surreal as the famous Salvador Dali sequence in Hitchcock’s Spellbound, and the shadows and light interplaying on that craggy face make some memorable impressions. There is a moment when in his pain he stamps down on the tin leg to crush the pills and the agony on his face is palpable.
It won’t take much imagination or provide much of a challenge to know Sammy will end up defusing one of the booby trapped devices, the twin of one that has already killed, and with a hell of a hangover, in a climactic scene of tension, or that doing so will decide his future and the fate of his relationship with Suzy, but that is dramatic structure and there is no way around it in book or film, even if anyone was silly enough to want one. It’s a tense scene and all involved wring every sweaty drop of fear out of it.
Neither the film nor the book is as well known here as it was in England, but if you can find the trade paperback edition I recommend both it and Balchin’s Mine Own Executioner (also an excellent film with Burgess Meredith and Kieron Moore) highly. And if you know the work of the Archers, especially of director Michael Powell, then that alone is enough to recommend the film.
And for what it’s worth Farrar was a cousin of mine, and we share the family nose, no small connection, so forgive me if I think it is one hell of a performance for an actor who a few years before was playing Sexton Blake in B films.
October 11th, 2014 at 6:22 pm
There’s probably no need to add that the Archers were also responsible for a gem of a film called I Know Where I’m Going, but I’ll do it anyway.
October 11th, 2014 at 6:41 pm
Your cousin? Wow! I think that this performance and his turn as Mr Dean in BLACK NARCISSUS are his best. Michael Powell apparently thought that he could have been a much bigger star had he really cared about acting. Even without a hunger for success, he was amongst Britain’s top ten most popular actors at the time.
One of the things that I like about this performance is that Farrar really doesn’t care about being liked all the time. When drunk he’s an absolute swine. There’s a lovely scene where he is drunkenly needling his friend the barkeeper (Sid James). Farrar is all mouthy aggression, whilst James is remaining icily polite, and you know that Rice is a hairsbreadth from getting the snot beaten out of him.
I like the realistic mood of the film. Powell and Pressburger had a real feel for the mystical/fantastical elements of the landscape, but here you get the sense of the everyday reality of the WWII homefront. It makes that dream sequence all the more effective. Kathleen Byron is gorgeous in this, and when you think of a number of her films from this period (her performance as the nun who turns into a black-eyed, white faced demon in BLACK NARCISSUS is a classic) you start to realise how much the film industry wasted her talents.
A final thought: I’m a huge fan of Anthony Bushell, but if you look at his IMDB filmography from 1951 to 1964, in about 13 of the 21 performances he is in uniform. Did he just have a set of various different military uniforms at home?
October 11th, 2014 at 7:23 pm
Bradstreet
Farrar wasn’t quite everyone’s idea of the leading man, and for a while he was type cast as the wounded hero (he is also the nyctaphobic protagonist of Anthony Pelissier’s film of Winston Graham’s NIGHT WITHOUT STARS one year later). He also played villains (Xerxes in 300 SPARTANS his last film in 1962)as often as heroes. He did do a good swashbuckler THE GOLDEN HORDE based on a Harold Lamb book with Henry Brandon (DRUMS OF FU MANCHU) as Genghis Khan.
This and BLACK NARCISSUS are his most famous roles. He’s also the villain in THE BLACK SHIELD OF FALWORTH, Dreyfus brother in I ACCUSE (the Jose Ferrer film), Pharaoh in SOLOMON AND SHEBA, the narrator of PURSUIT OF THE GRAF SPEE (the ARCHERS again), a British officer in THE SEA CHASE with John Wayne, and appears in ESCAPE TO BURMA, and DUEL IN THE JUNGLE.
He made his film debut in 1937 and played John Bentley’s private detective Dick Marlow in THE NIGHT INVADER. Ironically he did BLACK NARCISSUS (1947) only two years after MEET SEXTON BLAKE.
I agree about the scene where he needles James, its nicely played and staged as the precursor to the victory of that bottle of Scotch in his flat. And the use of the landscape in the film is at times surrealistic, a description I’ve heard often of wartime England. The loose gravel on the beach where he defuses the bomb becomes a major element in the plot, and the death of the young man in Wales in a claustrophobic army tent is nicely contrasted when Farrar and Gough stand outside in the rugged Welsh landscape.
Byron is almost ethereal here and was ethereal in BLACK NARCISUSS up to the point she turns demonic, but she is also incredibly sexy in this film, those long smoldering looks at Farrar extremely sensual. The film is incredibly frank about their relationship and the sadomasochistic nature of it. The scene where he tells her in the club that he likes to hurt her and she likes to be hurt must have slipped past the censor.
I always liked Bushell, but when he isn’t in uniform he seems to be in costume. Did he ever get to wear a modern suit in film?
October 12th, 2014 at 2:04 pm
Re Bushell: I did spend some time looking through my collection of movies, and found THE GHOUL(1933). It was a movie Karloff made when he briefly returned to Britain, and was recently re-released on DVD in an extraordinary print which had remained unplayed for decades. Bushell is the handsome young lead who solves the mystery and woos Dorothy Hyson. It’s weird to see him a)so young b)in civilian clothing. I also discovered that after the War, Bushell tended to be known as Major Bushell rather than Mr Bushell to his contemporaries.
October 12th, 2014 at 4:13 pm
I forgot that he was the romantic lead in THE GHOUL, good film based on a good book by Frank King (the Dormouse series). Really an outstanding Universal style horror film for the Brits at that time.
October 23rd, 2014 at 3:38 pm
I was fortunate to see this on the big screen a few years ago as part of a Brit-noir festival. It is just as ripping a yarn, as the OP characterizes it. Superbly well-done. I can add nothing more to his fine review; except perhaps to echo his sentiments as far as that ‘hallucination sequence’. It really is remarkable, the equal of what Dali did in ‘Spellbound’ and ought to be seen by anyone interested in graphic arts.
Other juicy morsels I was able to glom down during that same fest: “Hell Drivers” (which became my fave action film of all time, immediately upon viewing); Trevor Howard in “The Clouded Yellow”; “Went the Day Well?” (precursor to ‘Eagle Has Landed’); “Night and the City”; “Obsession”; “Appointment with Crime”; and “So Long at the Fair”. Cowabunga!
May 4th, 2019 at 9:59 am
[…] The Small Back Room […]