Sun 19 Oct 2014
AGATHA CHRISTIE – The Boomerang Clue. Dodd Mead, US, hardcover, 1935. First published in the UK as Why Didn’t They Ask Evans? Collins, hardcover, 1934. Reprinted many times in both hardcover and paperback, including Dell #46, mapback edition, no date [1944]. TV movie: London Weekend Television, 1980 (Francesca Annis & James Warwick). TV movie: ITV, 2009 (an episode of Agatha Christie’s Marple).
Don’t get the wrong idea about that last TV series adaptation. This is not a Miss Marple mystery, and not only was a very loud outcry about shoehorning a character into the story who didn’t belong there, but also how they badly botched the story line itself, or so I’ve read.
I’ve not seen this particular Marple adaptation, but (speaking generally) if there’s a perfectly fine story line that you’re working from, why mess around with it? Perhaps the producers thought that people watching their adaptation had never read the book. Perhaps the plan was to pull the rug out from under the feet of those who had, to give them a “surprise” ending.
But do you know, it doesn’t really matter. We’ll always have the book, and it’s a good one. I don’t know why, but I’m always surprised to pick up an Agatha Christie novel and discover all over again how readable she is. I started this one rather late at night, thinking to read a chapter or so, and an hour later I’d finished ten. Chapters, that is. It isn’t easy to write stories that read as easily as this, but it has to be one of the reasons Christie’s books are still in bookstores today and 99.9% of her contemporaries are not.
This one begins with a young Bobby Jones (not the famous one) hitting a golf ball and doing dreadfully at it, trying mightily several swings in succession, but hearing a cry, discovers a dying man lying at the bottom of cliff. He had fallen perhaps, as Bobby and his golfing partner believe, not to mention the police and the coroner’s jury, but we the reader know better.
Before he dies, though, the man utters a dying question: “Why didn’t they ask Evans?” We are at page 9 and the end of Chapter One, and anyone who can stop here is a better person than I.
Assisting Bobby in his quest for the truth, especially after surviving being poisoned by eight grains of morphia, is his childhood friend, Lady Frances Derwent, whom he calls Frankie. Together they make a great pair of amateur detectives, continuing to investigate the case even after the authorities have written the man’s death off as an accident.
The tone is light and witty, as if investigating a murder is a lark, but this intrepid pair of detectives do an excellent job of it, even to the extent of faking an automobile accident and inserting an “invalid” Frankie into their primary suspect’s home.
Before continuing, I’ll stop a moment here and point out that Bobby is the son of a vicar and a former Naval officer, while Frankie’s father is a Lord and extremely wealthy. The difference in social standing means little to Frankie, all but oblivious to her wealth, but it does to Bobby, who finds himself more and more infatuated with the young beautiful wife of a doctor they suspect is behind the plot, to Frankie’s displeasure, although the woman may be the man’s next victim herself. (This does not mean that Frankie is averse to using her position in life to help their investigation along.)
The tone does get darker as Bobby and Frankie close in on the killer, and at the same time, the threads of the plot get more and more complicated. I’d have rather the story stay focused on the detection, but toward the end it becomes more and more a thriller. It couldn’t be helped. The essential clue is there all of the time, but nothing could be deduced from it until the book has only 15 pages to go, but making the renamed US title at lat make sense.
In summary, here’s a book that’s immensely fun to read, with a delightful couple doing the honors in investigating a crime the police do not even realize was a crime, dreaming up various scenarios and coming up with sundry plots to incriminate the killer. Coincidences abound, but who cares?
October 19th, 2014 at 5:28 pm
Francesca Annis, especially her, and James Warwick, made a fine Frankie and Bobby. Their film goes on a little too long but is; memorable and fun, if not actually funny. The leads went on to perform equally well as Tuppence and Tommy the following year. I can’t imagine people reading this being unaware of the various television and film incarnations, but just in case a reminder is in order…delivered.
October 19th, 2014 at 6:17 pm
Yes, I knew about the Tuppence and Tommy connection, but I didn’t mention it, betting with myself on how long it would take for somebody else to point it out. If I had a prize to give away for such things, Barry, it would be winging its way on to you!
October 19th, 2014 at 6:24 pm
I loved the 1980 TV version too. It was the pilot of many later shows, establishing one could make a fine, faithful and joyous adaptation of Christie and other Golden Age sleuths.
Nick Fuller did a parody of the way Miss Marple was added to the later 2009 TV version. “Death Comes As the End” is a Christie tale set in Ancient Egypt. In Nick’s (imaginary) TV version, Miss Marple arrives in a time machine, and solves the case.
October 19th, 2014 at 10:56 pm
Incidentally a new Tommy and Tuppence series is being filmed as we speak, I assume remaking PARTNERS IN CRIME rather than adapting one of the novels.
The 1980 version showed the strength of even Christie’s early work. It is playful and fun, the characters well developed, and the mystery as always superior. Many of her early books have that thriller aspect and she did at least one in that mode with Poirot (THE BIG FOUR). She even had a go at a gentleman thief/adventurer.
They are still good books, but thankfully she found her forte.
And I agree it is always a delight to rediscover what a good writer Christie was. Her books capture you, and you keep telling yourself you will read one more chapter … Until you are so far in you surrender and go for the ending.
October 19th, 2014 at 11:06 pm
I’ve half expected to see THE BIG SLEEP with Miss Marple the way they shoehorn her in but we have to grant there are many fewer Marple books and short stories than there are Poirot’s.
Anyway they aren’t always all that faithful to Poirot either including that terrible adaptation of ROGER ACKROYD (who isn’t going to suspect Joss Ackland?)and this years THE BIG FOUR (though to be fair the movie had a better plot than the book that time).
October 20th, 2014 at 1:07 am
This book does rather point up the silliness of the idea that Christie could only write plot. Getting the mood of this sort of book absolutely right requires a good deal of skill, and by 1934 she had become a professional. It’s a straight thriller/whodunnit, but there also the sense that Christie is gently poking fun at that particular genre (Frankie and Bobby are both aware of the conventions of these sorts of stories). PARTNERS IN CRIME was strongly parodic and playful, and you feel elements of that here.
October 7th, 2020 at 10:45 am
[…] Why Didn’t They Ask Evans? has been reviewed, among others, at Golden Age of Detection Wiki, Mysteries in Paradise, reviewingtheevidence, The Grandest Game in the World, In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel, Cross-Examining Crime, Mysteries Ahoy! Countdown John’s Christie Journal, Classic Mysteries, and Mystery File. […]