Thu 5 Aug 2010
A Review by Ray O’Leary: DERMOT MORRAH – The Mummy Case Mystery.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[4] Comments
DERMOT MORRAH – The Mummy Case Mystery. Paperback reprint: Perennial Library, 1988. Hardcover editions: Harper & Brothers, US, 1933; Faber & Faber, UK, as The Mummy Case, 1933. Also published in the US under the British title: Garland, hardcover, 1976.
It’s the end of term at Beaufort College, Oxford, and Professor Benchley, the Egyptologist, has acquired a mummy from his arch-rival Professor Bonoff, a Russian with whom he has been carrying on an academic feud. The feud has apparently ended with Professor Benchley conceding defeat, but he has plans to sell the mummy for twice as much as he paid for it.
However, he turns down the offer of a wealthy American collector whom he had invited to lunch that afternoon. That night, while the Commemoration Ball is going on, a fire breaks out in Benchley’s rooms and, when it’s put out, the remains of one man are found.
A verdict of accidental death is brought in by the coroner’s jury but two of the younger Professors Sargent (law) and Considine (the Assyriologist) have their doubts — there should have been two burnt bodies found: Benchley’s and that of the mummy. So the two begin to investigate.
This is an entertaining light-hearted example of the Golden Age detective story, with some pleasant humorous touches thrown in. I read this when it first was issued in paperback, although I probably figured it out then as I did now because it uses a variation of a plot situation I’ve encountered in several whodunits and for which I have a rule that, if I stated it, would be giving away the solution.
Bibliographic Note: This is the author’s only mystery novel. It is included in Victor Berch’s checklist of Harper’s Sealed Mystery Series.
Also note that Mike Grost comments on this novel on his Classic Mystery and Detection website. Check it out here.
August 6th, 2010 at 12:34 am
This one hold up well, and the humor is still funny. A friend who is an amateur Egyptologist loved it so I assume it holds up on that level too. All in all this is one of the bright spots of the Golden Age. It may not be as ‘brilliant’ as say THE POISONED CHOCOLATES CASE, but I enjoyed it a good deal more than many a more complex and less familiar mystery of the period.
August 6th, 2010 at 12:49 am
Even though I know most mystery fans will have never have heard of this book, I’ve had it on my To Be Read list for a long time.
Between Ray’s review, Mike Grost’s observations, and now your comment, David, it’s going to climb a whole lot higher.
Question: Would it have been possible for the two professors who do the detective work in this one, as per Ray’s review, to have shown up in another murder investigation?
Or is it a one-shot all the way?
I’m thinking that if a series had come of the Mummy Case, maybe more people would know about it.
— Steve
August 6th, 2010 at 1:01 am
Steve
I don’t know why this is a one shot, unless the author may have felt he only had the one mystery in him. Certainly the sleuths, though unlikely to some extent, would have been no harder to work into another book than any others, and for that matter he could have written a perfectly good unrelated mystery with other sleuths.
I haven’t been able to find out anything about the author, but I guess we should be happy we got one classic.
But it is a very entertaining read by any standard.
August 6th, 2010 at 6:32 pm
This is a “nice” book – and a real mystery.
Wish Morrah had written more. Have no idea this was his only mystery.