Tue 10 Feb 2015
A Western Fiction Review by David Vineyard: CLARENCE E. MULFORD – The Coming of Cassidy.
Posted by Steve under Reviews , Western Fiction[16] Comments
CLARENCE E. MULFORD – The Coming of Cassidy. A. C. McClurg & Co., hardcover, 1913. Reprinted several times, including Tor, paperback, 1993. Also included in Wild Western Days: The Coming of Cassidy, Bar-20, Hopalong Cassidy, Forge hardcover, 2010. Also available online.
When asked what he thought of the huge Hopalong Cassidy revival of the late forties and early fifties that made Bill Boyd a superstar and millionaire, Clarence E. Mulford, who created the character and made no little money from Boyd’s popularity was purported to say: “He has his Hopalong, and I have mine.â€
It’s an accurate statement because Bill Cassidy the top hand of the Bar 20 has little in common with Bill Boyd’s avuncular paragon of virtues. Mulford’s Cassidy can drink any man under the table, has — to say the least — a colorful vocabulary, is deadly fast and doesn’t bother to shoot guns out of anyone’s hand, smokes, gambles, brawls, and has an eye for the ladies. He’s a tall lanky cowboy that looks more like John Dierkes Rafe in Shane than Bill Boyd’s immaculate man on the white horse.
This is from The Coming of Cassidy, a collection of integrated short stories, some merely vignettes. telling how young Bill Cassidy came to Buck Peters’ Bar 20 and became the leader of the Bar-20 Three, with Red Connors and young Johnny Nelson.
Bill Cassidy is a lanky young man who started riding north and arrives at Buck Peters’ ranch just as the ranchman is having trouble with a group of buffalo hunters. It’s not long before Cassidy is butting heads with one of them.
Mulford’s stories may be dated by today’s standards, but in many ways his easy style and classic approach to the Western makes him a more modern read than Max Brand or Zane Gray. It’s not that you will find anything unsavory about Hoppy and his crew, but you get the impression they have skirted close to unsavory in their past. Mulford never says it, but he knows those knights of the saddle were actually homeless virtual bums who often owned nothing of their own but their boots and spurs — certainly not a horse, gun, and saddle.
Many a real cowboy worked for a horse and a saddle and little pay.
This collection includes the story “How Hopalong Got His Hop†that explains how he got his famous name and the limp that dogs him throughout the books. Ironically Bill Boyd and the production company of the first Hopalong Cassidy film had no intention to utilize Hoppy’s limp, but Bill Boyd broke his leg early in the production.
And thus was born a nickname that found honor and fame in the cow-country a name that stood for loyalty, courage and most amazing gun-play. I have Red’s word for this, and the endorsement of those who knew him at the time. And from this on, up to the time he died, and after, we will forsake “Bill” and speak of him as Hopalong Cassidy, a cowpuncher who lived and worked in the days when the West was wild and rough and lawless; and who, like others, through the medium of the only court at hand, Judge Colt, enforced justice as he believed it should be enforced.
Reading these stories and the other books in the series it’s easy to see why the first choice to play Hoppy on screen was grizzled character actor James Gleason and not handsome Bill Boyd. Over the course of the films Hoppy changes partners a few times but remains the same kindly tough respectable man about the ranch, but Mulford’s Hoppy ages, drinks too much, gambles, and even gets married. At times he almost becomes respectable, much to his chagrin.
In one story he even gets shanghaied, and he and the boys have to start a mutiny.
Mulford stayed true to his creation even when his readers wanted the Bill Boyd version. It may have been Boyd on the book covers later, but the man inside was Bill Cassidy. Louis L’Amour, who wrote the Hopalong Cassidy short lived pulp magazine as Tex Burns, was caught between the two, but reading his books you can see it was Mulford’s Hoppy he preferred. His Hoppy looked more like Bill Boyd but it only went skin deep. (*)
Somehow I can’t see Bill Boyd’s Hoppy leading the pretty girl on without telling her she has the wrong man, but Mulford’s Hoppy does without turning a hair.
The books move quickly. Hoppy and his pals can’t stay out of trouble for more than a few paragraphs, if that. Gunsmoke curls in the air; keen eyed men stare across tables at each other and glance anxiously at five cards in their hand that could mean fortune, or death; cowboy’s slump in the saddle eyes staring into the darkness as they listen to the lowering cattle; horses throw them; rough humor dogs them; hand-mades hang from lean dry lips lighted by a lucifer; chaws of tobacco are spit with terrifying accuracy; men die; women weep; outlaws, Indians, gun men, crooked towns people, lynch mobs, buffalo hunters, skinners, stage coach drivers, whisky drummers, renegades, school marms, saloon girls, diamond-backs, mustangs, and longhorns, all the pantheon of the old west cross their path.
This is Ur-text, cowboy style. The age of Remington is not that far in the past. Charles Russell is still writing and painting. It has not been that long since Owen Wister’s The Virginian or Emerson Hough’s The Covered Wagon. Names like Jesse James, Billy the Kid, Buffalo Bill, Wild Bill, Butch Cassidy, are not that distant a memories. Zane Gray, Eugene Manlove Rhodes, and Max Brand are his contemporaries. Tom Mix, William S. Hart, Harry Carey, Bronco Billy Anderson, Buck Jones, Colonel Tim McCoy, and a young unknown named Gary Cooper ride across the for now silent screen waiting for him to join him even he is unrecognizable when he does.
It is to his credit that Mulford’s Hoppy has survived and not just Bill Boyd’s. His books can still be found on paperback racks and not so many years back a film, The Gunfighter, featured Martin Sheen as the older Hoppy, and one much closer to Mulford than Boyd.
Bill Boyd’s Hoppy will always have a hold on my heart, but in a real way Mulford’s creation is timeless as the film Hoppy is not. Boyd’s Hoppy seems a bit quaint now, not quite real, a little too perfect, he rides and lives in a West that never was, but Mulford’s Hoppy, swearing, spitting, guns blazing, cards held close to the vest, eyes squinted beneath his sombrero, a top his horse Ring-Eye, has a feel of authenticity. We know the West wasn’t like Boyd’s, but if it wasn’t like Mulford’s (and it wasn’t really) it should have been.
(*) It was the revival of L’Amour’s Hoppy novels, especially The Rustlers of West Fork, that inspired Tor Forge to revive Mulford’s Hoppy in modern paperback form. As for the true face of Hoppy, you’ll find it among the illustrations the giant of modern American illustration N.C. Wyeth did for Hoppy’s magazine appearances, but I warn you, Bill Boyd it is not.
On a similar note, while Bill Boyd is known for dressing in black that is an illusion of black and white film. Boyd is actually wearing a red shirt, yellow kerchief, and blue jeans in the early films. Only the hat and the boots were black. You just can’t tell on film. Later on the outfit conformed to the image and the comic book version, but early on he’s dressed almost as colorfully as Mulford’s Hoppy.
February 10th, 2015 at 4:54 pm
Mike Nevins is the authority on this, but I believe some of the books were revised in the 1940s to align with the movie character.
February 10th, 2015 at 6:38 pm
They were revised, and Mulford, whether he objected or not, was professional enough to understand, but he never truly embraced Boyd’s Cassidy.
L’Amour’s pulp stories split the difference but it is clear he would have preferred Mulford’s version.
The early books though are no where near as dated as you might expect, and the rough humor plays almost as great a role as the fast action and drama. It’s not hard reading these to see what attracted Wyeth to illustrating them.
It’s not the real west, but it is clearly written by someone who had an appreciation for the real thing.
February 10th, 2015 at 10:08 pm
I browsed through some of the Mulford books published in paperback by Tor a few years ago, and i passed them up. Although I was glad to see them being published again, I decided they weren’t for me. It was the dialogue that put me off. Too many purty’s, laigs, shore’s (for sure), cayuses, and yore’s (for your), and even harder to swallow, yourn. At least for me. If I had to pick a favorite western writer, it would probable be Max Brand, in spite of his many narrative lapses. If not him, then perhaps Luke Short. Louis L’Amour has never appealed to me. I don’t know why. I’ll have to think about that.
February 10th, 2015 at 11:06 pm
I prefer Short to L’Amour for the most part, I love Brand, but I do think his style in the early books is more dated than Mulford. Ironically what he and Mulford have in common is an almost classical approach, Brand’s works consciously so, but it isn’t hard to find some of the rough humor and violence of ancient epics in Hoppy’s adventures.
All the colloquialisms in Mulford probably bother me less because I heard many of them from actual working cowboys. Much of that is a phonetically accurate reproduction of an exaggerated Western drawl.
Granted it is a stereotyped and exaggerated voice, but not untrue if you were around rodeos, ranches, and horses in when I was young (no one still talks that way, but there were old timers who had been young working cowboys in the 1890’s still alive then — not that some of them weren’t imitating Gabby Hayes). I was a teen before the last Civil War vet died.
Mulford certainly isn’t for everyone, and the later books grow more serious, with actual novels found among them. For me the rough humor, the feeling you are watching Tom Mix or Harry Carey and not Clint Eastwood is part of the appeal of Mulford and Hoppy. It’s the west of Remington’s John Ermine, Hough, Wister, Bret Harte, and Twain, not that of Brand, Gray, and those who followed.
The hardboiled voice of the pulps began to change the western as early as Carroll John Daly’s Three Gun Terry Mack. That streamlined modern voice we are used to from the pulp and paperback western and movies may make for good reading, but it is a false voice, language in the real west was as flowery and elaborate as Tudor English, nothing at all like the voice we think of as authentic. You have to go to Thomas Berger’s LITTLE BIG MAN, Jerome Chayrn’s DEAD MAN’S HAND, and other non Western but more authentic voices (some of Garfield’s later westerns) to hear anything like the real voice.
Of course lets face it, a writer working in that language would never sell a modern western no matter how good. The best today do their research and pattern their morality plays against the backdrop readers will accept. It’s the same way Damon Runyon sounds dated today even though his voice was authentic.
Mulford just takes me back to a simpler time.
February 10th, 2015 at 11:28 pm
There is a book on early Frontier Fiction that I can recommend to anyone reading this. It’s by Ron Scheer and called HOW THE WEST WAS WRITTEN, 1907-1915.
I’m going to provide the Amazon link for it, not because I have any secret commercial agreement with them, but because they provide an extended look inside, and by following a link found in the contents page, you can read what Scheer says about Mulford as well as Owen Wister and several others. I found it very interesting, and indeed it complements what David has to say about Mulford and the original Hoppy:
http://www.amazon.com/How-West-Was-Written-1907-1915-ebook/dp/B00SGEV9P2
February 11th, 2015 at 1:33 am
I see I got interrupted before finishing that last comment I left. I hit post and went off to answer the phone, as I recall, and never got back to the computer until now.
I meant to say that, David, I agree with everything you say about Mulford, and that any fault in not being to read his Hoppy stories is mine. There are plenty of paperback westerns that I put down as soon as I hit a “yore” or “cayuse” or any other phonetic vernacular of the same vein. The usage I can understand, and in a movie, it works fine, if not overdone. I just can’t read it.
I also meant to mention Zane Grey. I devoured his books as a teenager. I can’t read him now. Maybe he’s a little too romantic, maybe he comes on too strong, or maybe his books are best read if you ARE a teenager.
February 11th, 2015 at 5:38 pm
There are a few Grey’s I can still read as an adult, but with some forgiveness on my part. I do think the teenager comment is accurate though. Some books you read at that age work more in the heart than the head.
I’ll grant the purty’s and cayuses get a bit deep, but at least in Mulford its not an affectation but a real voice.
February 12th, 2015 at 7:32 pm
Shucks, Steve, I cain’t understand how yew kin have so much trubble with thet old authentic Western dialect. Dag nab it!
Every so often I pick up the Mulfords on my shelves and decide I will read through the series from beginning to end. Somehow I never succeed and give up after the first two or three books. Not sure what’s going on there.
February 13th, 2015 at 11:20 am
I was a big fan of Hop-Along Cassidy movies as a kid. I have a few of CLARENCE E. MULFORD’s books on my shelves, but haven’t been tempted to read them.
February 13th, 2015 at 11:27 pm
Steve,
I didn’t get thirty pages into the Heuman THE RANGE BUSTERS you rightly praised for what it is before I hit this:
Stub spat. “You ain’t thinkin’ good,” he said.” Reckon I should ‘o stayed home tonight. Tired ‘o sittin’ around though.”
Gol-dang-it a feller can’t get away from this wrangler lingo, can he? Just when you think it is safe Gabby Hayes shows up.
Randy,
More than three Hoppy novels in a row would be a prodigious feat for even the most dedicated Mulford or Western reader, dagnabit! There’s only so many cayuses you can wrangle afore a man wants to go fer his shootin’ irons, by criminey.
February 13th, 2015 at 11:36 pm
Oof. Stabbed by my own petard. Or something like that. All I can say in reply is that it did take 30 pages, and that’s a long way into a short book.
February 13th, 2015 at 11:38 pm
Add this to the things I didn’t know until now: Pétard comes from the Middle French péter, to break wind, from pet expulsion of intestinal gas, from the Latin peditus, past participle of pedere, to break wind, akin to the Greek bdein, to break wind (Merriam-Webster).
February 14th, 2015 at 1:15 am
Basically a petard is that round metal bomb with the fuse in Mad’s Spy vs Spy. Horatio Hornblower throws himself on a French one in one of the novels, but luckily for fans it doesn’t go off.
Or as the French say, bombe.
February 15th, 2015 at 10:26 am
My take on BAR-20, the first Hopalong Cassidy novel, for any who might be interested:
http://kevintipplescorner.blogspot.com/2014/03/ffb-review-bar-20-1906-by-clarence-e.html
February 15th, 2015 at 10:35 am
A very good review, Barry!
February 15th, 2015 at 6:20 pm
Thanks, Steve. I should have added that a number of Mulford’s works are available at Amazon in Kindle format for nothing or next to it: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_0_12?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=clarence+e+mulford&sprefix=clarence+e.+%2Cdigital-text%2C485
YouTube currently has quite a few of the Cassidy films available: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hopalong+cassidy+full+movies
I’d also point out that Boyd’s Hoppy in the early films was much grittier than in the later ones–see, for instance, my favorite: “Hopalong Cassidy Returns.” He’s still not Mulford’s conception, I readily admit, but he remains my number one ‘B’ western film cowboy.
Say what you will about his use of the vernacular–and imaginary though it might’ve been, David–I have to put in a plug for George Hayes as the greatest, most entertaining sidekick ever. In the Hoppy films he began as Uncle Ben, had a minor role in “The Eagle’s Brood,” and subsequently became sidekick Windy Halliday. According to what I’ve read, he left Paramount where the Cassidy films were shot and joined Republic in 1938 or ’39. There he was paired with Roy Rogers and became, essentially, the same character under the name Gabby Whitaker.
The rest, as they say, is history.