Thu 10 Dec 2015
CARTER DICKSON – A Graveyard to Let. Berkley X1502; reprint paperback, January 1968. First published in the US by William Morrow, hardcover, 1949; first published in the UK by William Heinemann, hardcover, 1950. Other paperback reprints include: Dell #543, 1951; Belmont-Tower, 1973; Zebra, 1988.
When I was younger I used to gobble up anything John Dickson wrote as if they were candy going out of style, whether under his own name or as (in this case) Carter Dickson. I don’t remember reading this one, though, but some 60 years later (almost), I hope I might be forgiven if I did, and I forgot.
No matter. Either way, the book was new to me this time, or the same as, and unfortunately while it has its strong points, I didn’t enjoy it as much as I expected to, and I’ll get to that in a moment.
The irrepressible Sir Henry Merrivale is in the United States in A Graveyard to Let, which was written relatively late in his crime-solving career. It was the 19th of 23 novels he appeared in, and he makes the the initial part of his stay in this country a spectacular one. When finished, he must make haste to Washington DC, it is revealed, but for what reason, HM refuses to say.
There are a couple of comic (and almost silly) routines that take up more time than they should, to my way of thinking, the first as he demonstrates to a subway cop in vivid bombastic fashion how to go through the turnstiles free of charge. After reading how he did it, I went back to the original passage, and while while happened at the time isn’t very clear, I don’t think HM’s explanation holds up.
There is another passage toward the middle of the book in which HM unaccountably shows his prowess at American baseball, the only purpose in the story being, as far as I can tell, is for HM to clout a fastball over the fence into an almost deserted graveyard, where a body, seriously wounded but not dead, is found.
The man is also the same person who disappeared into thin air by jumping into a swimming pool under the watch of a small but significant crowd of people, and never coming out. Only his clothes come to the surface.
And that’s the crux of the case. HM has half the solution right away, or so he claims, but does he reveal his deductions? Not a chance – but that’s of course the game we’re playing, so I don’t hold that against anybody.
There are a couple of possible solutions, the other expounded upon by the aforementioned subway cop, which in many ways makes more sense than the real one, which takes all of Chapter 19, more than 20 pages long to work out in detail.
While intrinsically fascinating, that’s too much work, in my mind, but Carr/Dickson nearly pulls it off. Until, that is, you close the book and start to wonder, why on earth did the man who jumped into the pool need to put such a dramatic — and complicated — plan into action?
The reader of today isn’t interested in this kind of story any more, but you who are readers who are still interested in detective puzzles, this is one in which you have to watch the author’s every word. Every word. And as I said up above, at the risk of repeating myself, Carr/Dickson nearly makes it work.
December 11th, 2015 at 2:25 am
‘The reader of today isn’t interested in this kind of story anymore’. Really?
I realise that they are TV series, but both JONATHAN CREEK and DEATH IN PARADISE regularly use the form, and the latter series is enormously popular in the UK. In print Christopher Fowler has carved out a niche as a modern-day purveyor of impossible crimes, and I’ve seen the locked rooom appear sporadically in current crime novels. The reason that the form isn’t used more is that it is harder to write than the standard gloomy, ‘reallistic’ crime drama, rather than it being less popular, I think.
December 11th, 2015 at 9:10 am
Thanks for the rebuttal argument, Bradstreet. As they say, all generalizations are false, including this one, but the one I made should have been qualified, no doubt about it. Your examples are all good ones, but note that all three are British and barely known in this country. I will have to follow up on DEATH IN PARADISE myself. You also used the word “niche.” There seems to be a small market of readers who still enjoy the old-fashioned puzzle story, but with very few exceptions, such as Fowler and some of Bill Pronzini’s work, they seem to be put out by small independent publishers. Paul Halter’s books are easily available in this country, for example, but only one step up from print on demand editions.
December 11th, 2015 at 2:31 pm
HM doesn’t always hold up as well as Fell or the historical novels, but I enjoyed this one more for the nonsense about HM in America than for the puzzle, which was good enough to get a thumbs up if not a greatly enthusiastic one. I don’t disagree with any of your judgments about this one, I just had a slightly different reaction to it all.
It is not top notch Carr or Carter Dickson by any means, probably best for hardcore HM fans who enjoy is antics as much as the puzzle.
Carr could and did do silly well on occasion but he could also go too far once in a while and lose balance between the silly and the puzzle.
As for the popularity of the puzzle form it still does well enough on television and is often represented on BBC4 Extra in adaptations, but the reading public either isn’t as interested or, as Bradstreet suggests, it is just too hard for most writers to handle.
Still, Elizabeth George and P.D. James were bastions of the puzzle however modern the dressing and huge bestsellers so it might be that what is not as popular today is the puzzle story for the puzzles sake. Today the puzzle is all dressed up with novelistic tropes and realistic police procedure as often as not, but you can still recognize it under the mask. It is still a descendant of Carr, Christie, and Sayers if you dig a bit beneath the surface.
December 11th, 2015 at 11:16 pm
DEATH IN PARADISE has been a regular offering on the PBS schedule from Minneapolis in recent years.
December 12th, 2015 at 12:03 am
I checked out Amazon for the first season on DVD. Turns out I bought it a couple of months ago. The title just didn’t register with me, nor did I realize how strong the detective story component is. Now I’ll have to find where I put it.