Sun 27 Dec 2015
A Movie Review by Jonathan Lewis: JOHN PAUL JONES (1959).
Posted by Steve under Reviews , War Films[2] Comments
JOHN PAUL JONES. Warner Brothers, 1959. Robert Stack, Marisa Pavan, Charles Coburn (Benjamin Franklin), Erin O’Brien, Bette Davis (Empress Catherine the Great), Macdonald Carey (Patrick Henry), Jean Pierre Aumont (King Louis XVI), David Farrar, Peter Cushing. Director: John Farrow.
Aside from an exciting naval battle sequence toward the end of the film in which the title character, portrayed by Robert Stack, faces off with Sir Richard Pearson (Peter Cushing) and shouts that he has yet to begun to fight, John Paul Jones is an epic bore. It’s not so much that it’s a poorly constructed film or without a talented coterie of actors as it is that the script is remarkably, almost painfully, lifeless.
In many ways, the movie, at a running time just over two hours, plods along from scene to scene, many of which are exceptionally abbreviated in nature. Sad to say, but at times this Technicolor film plays less like a fictionalized historical drama than as an educational biopic classroom film. That’s not to say that John Farrow wasn’t a talented director or that he wasn’t capable of creating solid movies worth watching. Unfortunately, John Paul Jones simply isn’t one of his more durable works.
As far as Robert Stack, he may very well have been perfectly adequate in his portrayal of the Scottish-born Revolutionary War hero, but that just wasn’t enough. There’s something a little too stiff, almost genteel in the manner in which Stack portrays Jones. One could imagine other actors with a little more grit and subdued rage – Kirk Douglas and Jeff Chandler come to mind – in his stead.
But then again, with a script that plays it safe and never once allows the title character to lose his cool or show some warm-blooded passion, it’s difficult to imagine John Paul Jones as any anything but a meandering daytime cruise to nowhere particularly exciting.
December 28th, 2015 at 9:36 am
Another example of a very boring Revolutionary War movie. I gave up on this one well before the ending, so if the naval battle toward the end gave it some life, I missed it.
December 28th, 2015 at 4:39 pm
This is one of the dullest bio pics of the era, or any era. How they made a film this dull out of a Scottish adventurer with a penchant for pithy phrases I’ll never understand. It plays like it was made for the classroom.
Much of the films problem is Stack who is stiff, colorless, and seemingly asleep. Exactly what he thinks he is doing I don’t know, but he isn’t playing the swashbuckling Naval hero of the American Revolution.
He’s not helped by the screenplay or Farrow’s direction either.
They can’t even manage to make it interesting when he is sent to the court of Catherine the Great.