Fri 22 Apr 2016
Reviewed by Jonathan Lewis: BEAST OF THE YELLOW NIGHT (1971).
Posted by Steve under Horror movies , Reviews[5] Comments
BEAST OF THE YELLOW NIGHT. New World Pictures, 1971. John Ashley, Mary Wilcox, Leopoldo Salcedo, Eddie Garcia, Ken Metcalfe, Vic Diaz. Screenwriter-director: Eddie Romero.
It’s never a good sign when, fifteen minutes or so into a movie, you decide to pick up the DVD case and read the back of it to help you figure out what in the world is going on. Unfortunately, that’s what I felt compelled to do watching the opening of the Eddie Romero’s Filipino/American horror production, Beast of the Yellow Night.
Sure, it’s a low budget horror film, but the plot seemed so incredibly muddled and the picture quality (Alpha Video) was pretty low, so I needed some context as to what was transpiring in front of my very eyes.
That said, once I had some idea of the basic plot and once the movie finally started to make a little more sense, I began to appreciate — ever so slightly – Beast of the Yellow Night for what it is: namely, a grindhouse film that tries to be philosophical and one which occasionally succeeds in elevating a forgettable werewolf film into something bordering on the thoughtful, admirably so, and yet one which mainly falls flat.
Former pop sensation John Ashley portrays two characters. The first, Joseph Langdon, is an American soldier who deserted his unit in the Philippines and engaged in all sorts of nefarious acts. In order to save himself from Filipino soldiers hot on his trail, Langdon makes a devil’s bargain – literally – with Satan (a grinning, scenery chewing Vic Diaz).
Some decades later, Langdon returns to life in the guise of American businessman, Philip Rogers. Satan wants Rogers to do his nefarious bidding, but when Rogers refuses, he soon learns that he’s cursed. Disobey the devil and you turn into a hideous beast, or so it would seem. That’s about all there is to the movie.
And one more thing: Joseph Langdon may be a tortured soul, but he’s no Larry Talbot.
April 22nd, 2016 at 10:43 pm
The trailer was all I needed to see.
April 22nd, 2016 at 11:22 pm
The movie is actually better than the trailer suggests. Not to say that the movie is all that good, but the trailer is really poorly done
April 23rd, 2016 at 10:28 am
Often it’s the other way around. The trailer is better than the movie.
April 23rd, 2016 at 6:23 pm
Greater love hath no man than to watch this one rather than me having to. Great review, services above and beyond the call of reviewing for watching it.
April 23rd, 2016 at 7:53 pm
This is a movie that has gotten (so far) 2.8 stars out of ten on IMDb. On the other hand 419 other people besides Jon are now known to have watched it.