Sat 7 May 2016
Reviewed by Dan Stumpf: P. G. WODEHOUSE – Jill the Reckless.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[7] Comments
P. G. WODEHOUSE – Jill the Reckless. Herbert Jenkins, UK, hardcover, 1921. George H. Doran, US, hardcover, 1920. Serialised in Collier’s, US, 10 April to 28 August 1920, as “The Little Warrior,” and in Grand Magazine, UK, September 1920 to June 1921. Reprinted many times.
A sizzling, searing look at the sleazy underside of Broadway and the downtrodden dreamers who dance desperately to the sordid melody of despair.
Well, maybe not quite, but it is a bit different from Wodehouse’s usual thing. We get the customary mismatched engagement, disapproving dowager, silly-ass aristocrat and captivating young things in love, but Wodehouse serves it up with a bit of a change here.
For one thing, the central character in this book is female — a rarity in Plum’s male-centered universe — a well-to-do young lady, Jill Mariner, of a rather impulsive disposition (hence the title of the piece) engaged to tall, handsome and politically rising Derek Underhill, whose domineering mother looks on the planned nuptials with something less than enthusiasm, particularly when Jill is seen chatting with a friend from her childhood, now grown into a bemusing playwright.
With a nod to classical Greek tragedy, Wodehouse engineers a day for Jill that includes being arrested (for assaulting a man who was beating a parrot) getting jilted by Derek, and discovering that her guardian, lovable old Uncle Chris, has spent her trust fund and she is now penniless.
Well, characters in Wodehouse novels are almost always short of cash, but they are never actually destitute and desperate as Jill is here, and in short order, Uncle Chris takes her to upstate New York and berths her with some distant and miserly relations who soon begin treating her like a servant.
Wodehouse, however, is no David Goodis, Jill Mariner is no Jane Eyre, and we soon find her in Manhattan, employed as a chorus girl for a Broadway show-in-the-making, and being romantically pursued by the author of the show, the producer, and her bemused playwright friend who has been hired to re-write and fix it.
But wait, there’s more: Back in London, word has got out that Derek (remember him?) jilted Jill because she went broke; bad show, that, in everyone’s opinion, and when their mutual friend Freddie (the silly-ass of the piece) tries to explain that the break-up arose from a man beating a parrot… well Wodehouse fans know what sort of scenes will ensue, and Freddie is dispatched to America to find Jill and bring her back, only to have his mission run off the tacks when he inadvertently becomes a Broadway star.
You have guessed by now that Wodehouse’s view of struggling in the Big City is never terribly grim; when Plum writes about poverty, he treats it with the same sly humor (or humour, as he would have called it) he applied to his own deprivation in a Nazi internment camp: Keep calm and dither on.
There is also a bit more emotional complexity here than usual. Characters in Wodehouse stories get engaged, disengaged and re-engaged with the metronomic ease of a well-oiled clockwork toy, but here there’s heartbreak to endure and be gotten over. There’s a very telling scene where Jill explains to one of her suitors that her heart is like a room full of old ugly furniture and she won’t have room for anything new there until she can get rid of the old stuff. It’s an apt metaphor, unusually melancholy for Wodehouse, and perfectly sweet.
Fear not, though; this is still a Wodehouse novel, filled with its full quota of laughable situations and colorful characters who seem as briefly real and amusing as usual. Jill the Reckless may surprise Plum’s fans, but it won’t disappoint them.
May 8th, 2016 at 9:53 am
Even a lesser Plum, should such a thing even exist, is a treat. I think he has the best diction of any author I’ve ever encountered.
May 8th, 2016 at 12:48 pm
I’ve been teaching a course in “The World of P. G. Wodehouse” in the Cannon Valley Elder Collegium for the past six weeks (we meet once a week for two hours). I keep coming across references to books that we are not reading for class and which I haven’t read for years. Once the course is over (in two weeks) I want to re-read some of them. Dan, you have just added another title to my list …
May 8th, 2016 at 2:59 pm
He isn’t the one note author he is often taken for. He could ring changes on his usual themes, and all his work is not Bertie Wooster and Jeeves. Some of his protagonists, like Psmith and Jill have a bit more going on than the usual Wodehouse hero or heroine, and as always he is a master of plot.
I always thought it a shame he and his great friend from his youth Sax Rohmer never collaborated on the book. The imagination runs amok at the thought.
May 8th, 2016 at 3:30 pm
My collection of Wodehouse consists entirely of mass market paperback, a mishmash of different editions and publishers over the years. What I’d like to have is a matched set of all his works. I don’t believe it’s been done, although some publishers have done long runs of them.
If I were to start collecting them in earnest, I might go for a set of the Jenkins hardcovers from England. I couldn’t afford ones in jacket, I’m sure, although I once was in a used book shop that had a long shelf filled with them. What a sight that was!
May 8th, 2016 at 11:41 pm
I found a lot of Wodehouse in the Acorn Bookshop in Columbus, Ohio a few years ago.
May 8th, 2016 at 11:52 pm
I wonder if that’s the store I was thinking of for, Randy, unless you took them all the year before I stopped by the same shop. It may also have been a bookstore in Dayton some years earlier, when PulpCon’s were still held there.
No matter. If I were home and not in a LA hotel room, I’d go upstairs find a Wodehouse I haven’t read in a good long time. Or even better, not at all.
May 9th, 2016 at 4:35 pm
Steve, No, I didn’t take all of them, but the last time I was in Columbus was in 2014 and I remember buying a lot of them and having them mailed home. Some titles were in editions I had not seen before and I couldn’t resist.