Wed 22 Mar 2017
A PI Mystery Review: GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD – Not Long for This World.
Posted by Steve under Bibliographies, Lists & Checklists , Characters , Reviews1 Comment
GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD – Not Long for This World. Aaron Gunner #2. St. Martin’s Press, hardcover, 1990. Penguin, paperback, 1991.
In this, the second recorded case for L.A.-based private eye Aaron Gunner, he’s hired by the female defense attorney for a young South Central gang member accused of killing the black founder of the L. A. Peace Patrol — a mild-mannered man who had taken it upon himself to try to rein in gang-related violence in the city.
It takes Gunner a while to decide to take the case, mostly because he doesn’t believe there is much redeeming value in the boy, but the conviction by his lawyer that he’s innocent eventually helps persuade him. It isn’t an easy case to investigate. All of the witnesses and other people he must ask questions of are either gangbangers themselves, or people intimidated by them.
To my mind there might be more social significance to this tale if Gunner were a stronger character. Even once he’s taken the case, he’s never quite sure if he made the right choice, nor is he the kind of guy who’s always infallible. Not helping matters is that the story is told in what I’ve decided to call the “impersonal third person” mode. Every so often, Gunner is referred to only as “the investigator,” not a description designed to give the reader a lot of confidence in his abilities.
I’m also not a fan of PI’s going to bed with the dead man’s widow while on the case. Which is a complicated one in many ways, but not in one essential way: I believe the real villain is discernible immediately, once he (or she) steps onto the stage.
Overall, then: quite readable, but flawed.
The Aaron Gunner series —
Fear of the Dark (1988)
Not Long for This World (1990)
You Can Die Trying (1993)
It’s Not a Pretty Sight (1996)
When Last Seen Alive (1997)
All the Lucky Ones Are Dead (1999)
March 22nd, 2017 at 9:22 pm
You have to go all out with a certain type of fictional eye. At some point the character’s second guessing himself becomes contagious and the reader second guesses why he’s reading.
Gunner never fully jelled as a character in the ones I read. It always felt as if the writer was stepping back from the character and it made me feel the same way.
Even if the character isn’t committed to the investigation the writer has to commit to him or the reader won’t.