Sun 26 Nov 2017
Archived Review: CHRISTOPHER B. BOOTH – Mr. Clackworthy.
Posted by Steve under Pulp Fiction , Reviews[14] Comments
CHRISTOPHER B. BOOTH – Mr. Clackworthy. Chelsea House, hardcover, 1926.
What I know about Booth is that he was a prolific writer for the pulp magazines in the 1920s and 30s, with just under three and a half pages of entries in Cook and Miller’s Mystery, Detective, and Espionage Fiction. These are only the detective stories. On Bill Contento’s FictionMags site, I also see a smattering of western stories for him, and these are only the tip of the iceberg, as relatively few of the western magazines have been indexed yet.
According to Al Hubin’s Crime Fiction IV, Booth wrote ten novels under his own name, all from Chelsea House, and eight more as by John Jay Chichester, also all from Chelsea House. Also to his credit is one book on which he shared the writing duties, and that was with Isabel Ostrander, another long-time writer for the pulps.
To point out that you can not always trust the Internet for factual information, some sites suggest that Christopher B. Booth was a pseudonym for Isabel Ostrander. Not so, even though Ostrander (who died in 1924) really was the lady behind ‘Robert Orr Chipperfield,’ ‘David Fox,’ and ‘Douglas Grant.’
Chelsea House was the hardcover publishing arm of Street & Smith Publications, which also produced Detective Story Magazine, where most (all?) of the novels were serialized first.
Or cobbled together out of short stories, as was the book at hand, Mr. Clackworthy. There are nine of them in this volume. Of the book which was the sequel to this one, Mr. Clackworthy, Con Man, I do not know if the same is true. Hubin in CFIV does not say yes, which may very well mean no. (I suspect the answer is yes, however.)
Enough of the general background, I suppose. To get down to business, you should know first of all (or based on the second title, you may have already deduced) that Mr. Clackworthy was one of those protagonists so often on the wrong side of the law in the 1920s, a con man. I imagine someone could write a thesis if not a dissertation on such individuals in the world of crime fiction.
Here is an off-the-wall question. What character in what novel(s) would qualify as the last in the line of such con men, preying mostly on the rich and unscrupulous, but not necessarily giving to the poor, of which Mr. Clackworthy does not make a general practice?
I am not an expert, so nor will I even attempt to list any of the other characters who would fall into the category. If you can help, please do, otherwise we shall leave the matter to someone who needs a thesis if not a dissertation on their academic record. (Of course such a someone then would be also obliged to put into perspective WHY con men who preyed mostly on the rich and unscrupulous were so prevalent in the 1920s. One can guess, though.)
As a start to such a project, it belatedly occurs to me, if you will allow such an interjection such as this, may be Yesterday’s Faces #3 : From the Dark Side, by Robert Sampson (Bowling Green Press, 1987), a rollicking account of all sorts of bad guys who inhabited the pages of the pulp magazines.
And by the way, before it slips my mind and we head off into the review itself, I would like to point out that in the pages of Detective Story Magazine Mr. Clackworthy met another of that magazine’s regular characters, Johnston McCulley’s lisping pickpocket, Thubway Tham, on at least one occasion: “Mr. Clackworthy and Thubway Tham†(Detective Story Magazine, March 4, 1922). Even though Cook-Miller suggests that only Booth was the author, this may be the first team-up on record between two characters created first by two separate authors. (Does one count, however, Arsene Lupin Versus Holmlock Shears, by Maurice LeBlanc, Richards, 1909? One must posit some ground rules, one supposes.)
Further investigation into the subject reveals another story of interest: “Thubway Tham and Mr. Clackworthy,†by Johnston McCulley (Detective Story Magazine, February 18, 1922, or two issues earlier). You can read this story in the recent edition of Tham thtories from Wildside Press, Tales of Thubway Tham, although in that edition the story is called “Thubway Tham Meets Mr. Clackworthy.â€
One source does suggest that the team-up was a three-part serial. This may be so, but if indeed it is, I have not yet uncovered a third tale in the triptych, and to this date, the matter rests, for now.
Let’s get on with the review. The best way to do that, I decided the moment I started reading it, is to quote the opening paragraphs, right from the beginning:
James Early, whose record at police headquarters credited him with the alias of “The Early Bird,†was standing at the window of Mr. Clackworthy’s [Chicago] Sheridan Road apartment, gazing glumly at the stream of traffic that flowed past in its usual Sunday afternoon flood. The Early Bird was a lost soul during those times when there was none of Mr. Clackworthy’s nefarious schemes under way to occupy his mind and to keep his wits sharpened.>P>
All con men naturally work on the concept of greed, as many a Nigerian knows full well today. Booth’s prose style is not all that dissimilar to that of his contemporary (at the time), Erle Stanley Gardner, whose Lester Leith stories for Detective Fiction Weekly started out in very much the same fashion.
Most of Mr. Clackworthy’s victims well deserve it — greedy bankers, swindlers, unscrupulous investors, and so on – getting their comeuppance in a rough and tumble sort of justice, in a naive, twinkle-in-the-eye sort of way, but even innocent banks sometimes fell afoul of his various and sundry plots and plans. (But were banks truly innocent of wrongdoing in the 1920s? Perhaps Booth’s readers did not really think so.)
In any case, these stories were written, read and enjoyed in a different time and place. If you’re read this far into the review and other commentary, however, I see no reason why you shouldn’t read and enjoy them, too, even if no one is writing them like this any more.
UPDATE #1: Thanks to the eagle-eyed Monte Herridge, one of the nine stories has been identified so far. It is “Mr. Clackworthy Tells the Truth,†from the October 19, 1920, issue of Detective Story Magazine, the cover of which is shown here to the right. If and when others are identified, you will read about it here first.
This particular story, amazingly enough, can be read online. (Follow the link.) What is interesting is that some editing was done when the story appeared in book form. Small descriptive sentences and paragraphs were removed. If you want to read the complete text, in other words, you have to go back to the primary source.
UPDATE #2. Very early on this blog, some 10 years ago now, I posted the results of my continued research into the stories in the three collections of Clackworthy stories, identifying as many as possible of the stories contained in each. (The third collection was published by Wildside Press in 2006.) You can read the post here.
November 26th, 2017 at 10:33 pm
Conmen were a popular subgenre from Grant Allen’s Colonel Grant well into the twenties but with the rise of the more popular Saint type the con man took a backseat to cracksmen, gentlemen adventurers, and various avenger or justice figures.
They continued to appear in stories and novels, Nicholas Monserratt’s THE NYLON PIRATES and Victor Canning’s QUEEN’S PAWN, both feature organized con men who meet bad ends, but the gentle grafters were pretty much out with O Henry.
I’m coming up blank, short of television series, of print series featuring primarily conmen heroes though there is always Gerald Kersh’s Kharmesian.
The good conman remains a popular cliche, and certainly some other criminous types like the Saint or Kek Huygens had their con moments, but the heyday seemed to pass with the twenties.
November 26th, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Speaking of TV series, one from the 50s was Colonel Humphrey Flack, starring Alan Mowbray. His gimmick was that he was a con man who preyed on other con men. The character was created by Everett Rhodes Castle and appeared in a series of stories for the Saturday Evening Post in the mid-30s.
That’s the best I can do!
November 27th, 2017 at 3:18 am
WHITE COLLAR is an engaging TV series about a conman paroled to the FBI. He helps them set up stings on the side of Good.
LEVERAGE is another example.
November 27th, 2017 at 8:01 am
That link only gave me a bunch of gibberish letters.
November 27th, 2017 at 8:33 am
That’s strange. Both of the links in my post and updates work for me.
November 27th, 2017 at 1:54 pm
Just did it on the phone and it worked perfectly, but the laptop wouldn’t work.
Weird.
November 27th, 2017 at 5:38 pm
Edgar Wallace, E. Phillips Oppenheim, William Le Queux, O Henry, and countless others had varying conmen heroes who started late in the 19th century and who were still raising their wary heads here and there at least until the early 1950’s, but the fashion for the form reached its peak in the Twenties, and while you might think the Depression would have brought a flood of the type it instead seemed to kill the jovial conman cliche, in print anyway.
Maybe money was entirely too important after the Crash, but there was a clear sea change, and it was reflected in the hardboiled school and it’s English cousin the Gentleman Rogue. It was one thing for justice of a sort to be dealt by a Lester Leith, Riley Dillon, revised Raffles, Kate Plus Ten, Four Square Jane, Henry Prince, or Dormouse, and another for a Mr. Clackworthy just to make a profit at the expense of a wealthy bad man.
Taking money was no longer enough. After the crash bad men had to be brought low, thrown to the wolves, dealt with by summary justice, or dragged into public humiliation, at least in popular fiction.
Television, radio, and the movies never lost their taste for the type whether it was Brett Maverick out West or more recently Leverage. Switch had Eddie Albert and Robert Wagner as cop and con teamed; Gig Young, David Niven, and Charles Boyer shared duties on the Rogues, Remington Steele played another variation, and so on, but in print the type was edged out by more avenging types (early Travis McGee isn’t averse to running a con, but again strictly as an avenger looking to make a profit as well).
I know I am missing something, but I can’t think of more than a handful of print series post 1932 about strictly con men heroes other than the few we have mentioned. I keep thinking there must be something obvious we are missing, and there are a few series about borderline types who almost fit, but nothing that really compares to the example shown above.
I suspect the world was simply too serious a place from 1932 on for the gentle grafters to flourish in print though the form still appears with variations on screen.
November 27th, 2017 at 8:20 pm
Stories of many of the characters you mention are included in Otto Penzler’s recent doorstop of a book about Rogues and Villains, referenced here, including both Mr. Clackworthy and Colonel Flack, the latter a tale from 1943.
It’s curious that the tradition has carried on so well on TV and not in printed from. I’m stumped as to an reason why.
November 27th, 2017 at 11:11 pm
7. David, I am impressed. You got all the TV series I can think of without looking. There was Harry Lime of THIRD MAN film, TV series and radio.
I need to think about radio series.
Don’t forget the reason the conman became popular in the 70s – the film THE STING (1973).
My guess to why conmen were popular is based on the history of the period. The 20s were a time when the rich and powerful were not always popular but were still someone most hoped to become. What better way to become rich than to out smart the old and powerful? WWI had ended and the Spanish flu killed millions. It was a time when young people could die without warning. People lived for the day with sex, drugs and illegal booze openly embraced. Authority figures were in the pocket of the rich and powerful so there was an appeal to humiliate those above your station. Add the belief everyone could become rich (a thought destroyed by the fall of the stock market) made people want to replace the rich and powerful not destroy them.
November 28th, 2017 at 1:05 pm
Radio seemed more interested in catching conmen than rooting for them. Series such as EASY MONEY, HELLO SUCKERS and BUNCO SQUAD were about investigators busting conmen and their rackets.
TV had its version RACKET SQUAD.
My guess is the crime grew more black and white after WWII and during the 50s red scare.
November 28th, 2017 at 4:51 pm
BURN NOTICE is another contemporary TV series, whose heroes often run “schemes”. These are not quite cons – but they come close.
November 29th, 2017 at 12:16 am
Mission Impossible and dating back pre WW I Clarence New’s Freelances of Diplomacy both have feet in the con man story, however noble the cause.
One of my favorite Western’s A BIG HAND FOR THE LITTLE LADY, is a delightful con man caper.
Surprisingly most of the writers who might have written about con men tended to write about more violent and or ambitious criminals like Donald Westlake, and variations of the gentleman adventurer like Lawrence Block’s Bernie. The con often plays a role in a heist, but the basic set up is different.
Both Jim Thompson and John D. MacDonald wrote good light hearted and not so light hearted con men novels (HELLER FROM TEXAS, THE GRIFTERS, PLEASE WRITE FOR DETAILS), but in part due to the success of THE ASPHALT JUNGLE, the caper or hijack film replaced the con game on the big screen even in comedy.
Though there is a fine con Christmas film called THE CHEATERS I saw last year for the first time with Joseph Schidlekraut and Victor Moore, and TWO ON A TRAIN with Lucille Ball and John Hodiak co written by Leslie Charteris features a pair of competing cons both pursued by humane cop Lloyd Nolan.
But post depression darkness seemed to kill the jovial con of popular fiction in print.
There was a short lived series with Robert Vaughn not too long ago where he was the retired leader of a gang of slightly reformed cons. The title eludes me though.
A few amoral type like Augustus Mandrell seem closest, but it is a long reach from Mr. Clackworthy to jovial assassin.
November 29th, 2017 at 3:25 am
This looks like a prime topic for a list of fictional con men.
Add movies PAPER MOON (73) (and TV show), and GRIFTERS (90).
David the British series was HUSTLE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5MtbZ1aKiM
November 30th, 2017 at 1:43 am
There are lists of fictional con men (and women) online, but I’ve looked at them, and most of them aren’t con men stories by any definition I’d consider valid. Nor do most of them include any of the characters we’ve been talking about in the comments here.
If I were younger, this would be a project I’d take on at the drop of a hat, and I’d drop my own hat. But I’m not as young as I used to be, and dropping hats is alas a thing of the past.