Fri 5 Jan 2018
Reviewed by LJ Roberts: CHRISTOPHER FOWLER – Bryant & May: Wild Chamber.
Posted by Steve under Bibliographies, Lists & Checklists , Characters , Reviews[13] Comments
Reviews by L. J. Roberts
CHRISTOPHER FOWLER – Bryant & May: Wild Chamber. Bryant & May #14. Bantam, US, hardcover, December 2017.
First Sentence: On a desolate rain-battered London midnight, the members of the Peculiar Crimes Unit went looking for a killer.
London has many private gardens, accessible only to the residents who live around them. The gardener also has a key but doesn’t expect to find the body of a woman who’d taken her dog for a walk. She has been strangled and neatly laid out on the path, her dog missing, and the garden locked before the gardener’s arrival. A second such body is found in a public park. At risk are more murders, the city’s parks being closed to the public, and the PUC disbanded. The clock is ticking.
An aerial chase, a traffic jam, a boy’s death and a man whose life implodes. This is an opening which catches one’s attention.
That Fowler uses a memo to provide a cast of characters is both helpful and clever. That the list includes “Crippen, staff cat,†and the subsequent memo brings readers up to date on the situation at the aptly-named Peculiar Crimes Unit truly sets the tone for what follows. Fowler’s books are not one’s normal police procedural, as the characters, particularly those of Arthur Bryant and John May, are anything but what one would normally find. Fowler gives us something unique with present day crimes overlain with an education into obscure historical facts and writing which increases one’s vocabulary. But never fear; this book is anything but dry or boring.
Fowler is skilled at juxtaposing historic London over that of the present day in a way that contributes to the plot. Part of that is an explanation as to how Bryant became a detective. Fowler creates evocative descriptions— “The wind was high in the trees, breathing secrets through the branches.” —and observations— “Looking down on King’s Cross you’d have noticed an odd phenomenon: Every other roof was covered in white frost, forming a patchwork quilt, an indicator of which properties were owned by overseas investors and which had warm families inside.†But yes, unfortunately, there are also quite a few completely unnecessarily portents.
It is hard to say which is more enjoyable; the cast of strange and fascinating characters of Bryant’s acquaintance, the vast abundance of arcane and historical information — who knew it was Arthur Sullivan of Gilbert and Sullivan, who wrote the music to “Onward Christian Soldiers”? — the members of the PUC itself, of the plot which brings all these facets together into a perfect gem of a book with a well-done plot twist. We are even given a definition as to what is a murder mystery— “’A murder mystery,’ she told Bryant, ‘is an intellectual exercise, a game between reader and writer in which a problem is precisely stated, elaborately described, and surprisingly solved.’†—and Fowler does just that.
Bryant & May: Wild Chamber is a murder mystery in the best sense. All the clues are given, if we but see them. The best part of the book is the very last line, but that everyone will have to read for themselves.
The Bryant and May series —
1. Full Dark House (2003)
2. The Water Room (2004)
3. Seventy-Seven Clocks (2005)
4. Ten Second Staircase (2006)
5. White Corridor (2007)
6. The Victoria Vanishes (2008)
7. On the Loose (2009)
8. Off the Rails (2010)
9. The Memory of Blood (2011)
10. The Invisible Code (2012)
11. The Bleeding Heart (2012)
12. The Burning Man (2015)
13. Strange Tide (2016)
14. Wild Chamber (2017)
15. Hall of Mirrors (2018)
January 5th, 2018 at 8:20 pm
Even though I purchased and own the first eight in the series, I have not read any of them. The reason that I suspect I stopped at eight is that is around the time that Borders went out of business. I did not know that Fowler was still writing them. I have never seen them in Barnes and Noble, or I would still be buying them.
This has always sounded like my kind of detective fiction. How do I make up for this huge gaffe of mine? Should I dig out my copy of the first one and start with that one, or can I jump in anywhere?
January 6th, 2018 at 1:04 am
One of my favorite series, a blend of John Dickson Carr, Edmond Crispin, and Ealing comedy with a touch of Dr. Who, TV’s The Avengers, a bit of Michael Innes, and something distinctly Fowlerian I can’t describe.
Despite all those poor comparisons, the books are unique, and uniquely entertaining.
January 8th, 2018 at 11:47 am
Steve, yes, I would definitely read them in order. As this is the 14th book in the series, you’ve some catching up to do. However, if you want just a fun taste of Fowler’s writing, his books of short stories “London’s Glory” is a real treat.
January 8th, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Thanks, LJ. Rather than try to find my copy of the first book, boxed away somewhere, maybe I can find a betup one online somewhere. That short story collection sounds very very interesting, too.
January 10th, 2018 at 9:44 am
I have read all the novels and consider each one a delightful treasure. This history is fascinating and skillfully woven throughout the well crafted mystery plots as L. J. mentions. I don’t consider it necessary to read them in order as Fowler always does an excellent job of briefly tying the relationship threads together in each book. He will even have an occasional footnote referring the reader to another book in the series. The books function well as stand-alones: Fowler avoids the hideous practices of cliff hanging endings and seeding his novels with book to book agony reveling subplots that have nothing to do with the story.
January 10th, 2018 at 9:24 pm
Well, that does it. I’m going to have to get my hands on one — any one of them at all!
January 12th, 2018 at 1:56 pm
Haven’t read this yet, but I will. I love this series, it is one of the few contemporary series of books I always look forward to. I too enjoy reading the introductory memo Fowler provides at the beginning. So wry and dry and yet loony.
‘Crippen, Staff cat.’ That still makes me laugh out loud. In fact, I look forward to the memo precisely because I know it will make me laugh.
January 12th, 2018 at 1:59 pm
P.S. I thoroughly agree with David Vineyard.
January 12th, 2018 at 3:59 pm
I agree with Bill Kelly. You don’t need to start at the beginning, Steve. I’d actually recommend that you start with THE VICTORIA VANISHES and read in order to THE INVISBLE CODE. You can read the first five in whatever order you want. Two of them take place in the past and have nothing to do with the chronology of the other four. And the series really doesn’t take form until WHITE CORRIDOR. The only two books that absolutely need to be read in order are ON THE LOOSE and OFF THE RAILS, as the latter is a continuation of the story in the former.
Always left off the list is RUNE which I feel is the true beginning of the Bryant & May series. I absolutely think that diehard Bryant and May fans should read RUNE to see what the two policemen were like long before they become cult favorites. The book was reissued as an EBook as was most of Fowler’s back catalog from the 1980s.
January 12th, 2018 at 5:42 pm
Are the two of them actually in RUNE? I had no idea they were. No source seems to mention them as being in it.
Unless, this from the Kirkus review:
“Harry’s search is independent of the official police inquiry, which is in the hands of a most charming pair of senior detectives and a clever, beehived policewoman.”
Are they the pair of senior detectives?
January 13th, 2018 at 1:17 pm
Yes, they are. And Janice Longbright is the beehived policewoman in that quote. The PCU appears in the book at its earliest stage. I thought I made that clear. Guess not. I’m beginning to feel like Ingrid Bergman in Gaslight.
No surprise to me that “no source” mentions it. Even Fowler himself keeps it hidden from his fans on his own website’s bibliography page.
January 13th, 2018 at 1:24 pm
Aha! I just found the only time that Fowler talks about B&M being in RUNE:
“Bryant and May make their first appearance solving a very peculiar series of supernatural crimes in ‘Rune’.”
There you have it from the author himself!
The sentence is found in a blog post Fowler wrote called “Where Are Arthur & John?” in which he discusses where the PCU characters appear in his other novels and stories. Here’s the link for anyone interested:
http://www.christopherfowler.co.uk/blog/2012/01/07/where-are-arthur-and-john/
January 13th, 2018 at 6:07 pm
Thanks, John. I’m going to rake a chance on this one and read it first. Copies on Amazon are quite inexpensive.