Wed 31 Jan 2018
A Movie Review by Dan Stumpf: THE HYPNOTIC EYE (1960).
Posted by Steve under Crime Films , Reviews[17] Comments
THE HYPNOTIC EYE. Allied Artists, 1960. Jacques Bergerac, Merry Anders, Marcia Henderson, Allison Hayes, Joe Patridge, Guy Prescott, Jimmy Lydon… and Lawrence Lipton, “King of the Beatniks.†Written by Gitta & William Read Woodfield. Directed by George Blair.
An agreeably hokey B-movie aimed at the degenerate kiddie trade. There’s a disturbing edge of misogyny, as raw and discomfiting as anything in Fuller or Franju, but the sheer naïve showmanship carries it through—mostly.
Let’s get the nastiness out of the way first. Eye opens with a woman mutilating herself, and there’s another similar scene later on. This should be enough to disqualify it from any meaningful discussion, but I recall vividly that this movie was marketed to kids my age, and we lapped it up with the unconcern of children.
Moving right along then, it’s perfectly obvious to everyone but the cops (Joe Patrick and Guy Prescott, who does a rather effective job as a Police Psychiatrist) that the women are under the influence of some diabolical mind control, engineered by creepy stage hypnotist Jacques Bergerac, with some unsettling input from his lovely assistant, the ubiquitous Allison Hayes, who was literally a towering presence in the trashy movies of her day.
The police do their usual plodding best, assisted at first by Marcia Henderson, until she too falls under Bergerac’s spell, leading to a steamy sequence (literally) where Ms Hayes tries to get her under a shower of scalding water.
There are some major continuity gaps here. The detective watching Marcia from the curb outside her house finally goes in and confronts Hayes, but in a lengthy scene in the house, he doesn’t recognize her, despite having seen her on stage. Then later, when the cops go back to check on her, Marcia is living in an apartment!
It all ends in an effective and highly theatrical set-to on stage in a packed theatre, but along the way there are a couple of amusing detours: First a nightclub scene where Lawrence Lipton, “King of the Beatniks†recites Beat Poetry, including the immortal line, “I saw ‘Charley’s Aunt’ in the original uncut version.â€
Then towards the end there’s a moment where the movie breaks the fourth wall, as Bergerac looks straight into the camera and hypnotizes his audience, blurring the line between film and real life in much the same manner as William Castle did in The Tingler.
This sequence was quite a hoot in theaters, but its effect seems somewhat diminished on TV. I don’t remember much about it, but I awoke the next morning convinced that Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
January 31st, 2018 at 10:34 pm
Funny as hell. Not the film, Dan’s review. I do want to see the picture, but it surely cannot measure up. In fact, has no chance, but worth a run at.
February 1st, 2018 at 4:42 am
Came out in Psycho’s year, this really does have a disturbing, detached clinical approach to its mutilations. Making the viewer almost a part of the acts – as befitting the film’s theme.
February 1st, 2018 at 10:47 am
I’m presuming that you’re going to include a link to the earlier appearance of this “klassik” back in ’16, which includes one of my borderline erudite comments.
I thought of this one the other day, in connection with the passing of Dorothy Malone, to whom Jacques Bergerac was somewhat calamitously married just prior to Peyton Place.
About this time, Malone and her two daughters by Bergerac made the cover of TV Guide – two cute toddlers who by now are eligible for membership in AARP.
Back to Hypnotic Eye for a bit:
Once again, no love for the Great Impostor, Fred W. Demara?
My comments at the earlier entry stand; recently I obtained SHOUT’s collection of Take A Good Look, Ernie Kovacs’s “panel game”, in which Demara appears as a contestant.
This was not long after the Tony Curtis movie came out, and the celebrity panelists had no trouble guessing him – and a good time was had by all.
February 1st, 2018 at 11:38 am
Here’s the link to the earlier review, Mike:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=40123#comments
And you’re right. The earlier comments are worth repeating.
February 1st, 2018 at 10:55 am
Mike, I remember seeing Demare on a rerun of YOU BET YOUR LIFE where he told Groucho he would use the money he won to acquire some credentials.
February 1st, 2018 at 4:58 pm
ray o’leary:
I remember Fred Demara’s shot with Groucho, which I think happened after the Kovacs appearance.
Both were in the same time frame as the Tony Curtis Great Impostor movie, from the time when they really knew how to promote movies.
I wonder … did Fred Demara ever get on To Tell The Truth? That would have seemed to be a natural …
After I typed this, I happened to recall that one of the credited staff members on Goodson-Todman panel shows was Judy Crichton, whose husband Robert Crichton wrote the first book about Demara (called The Great Impostor, natch).
One of those Incredible Coincidences, I guess …
February 1st, 2018 at 5:41 pm
Dan can not only be funny, but sly as well:
“. . . the ubiquitous Allison Hayes, who was literally a towering presence in the trashy movies of her day.”
“a towering presence”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_of_the_50_Foot_Woman
February 1st, 2018 at 6:10 pm
I was wondering if anyone else was going to spot that.
February 1st, 2018 at 7:18 pm
I was still reeling from the towering Ms Hayes when he slipped in the Manchurian reference.
Now I have a headache.
Great review.
What I always think of regarding this film is it just isn’t bad enough to be as much fun as it wants to be or good enough to be serious. It isn’t just clinical, it’s pancake flat, even managing to make mutilation more boring than horrible.
It does have its moments, but doesn’t exploit them, and never really reaches the point where your willing suspension of disbelief is willing to suspend, in fact the last time I saw this I[m pretty sure my willing suspension of disbelief went on strike.
February 2nd, 2018 at 1:48 am
You can make all the smug comments you want from a sixty-year perspective, but I’ll tell you that its horrors, presented in a matter-of-fact fashion, really resonated.
There were a few such films that hit tv then that had that effect. Horrors of the Black Museum another – its sadistic weapons actually presented in a lecture.
Another was Murders in the Rue Morgue ’54. Its crimes filmed like rape scenes.Scorcese even “homaged” one of its scenes for Gangs of New York.
February 2nd, 2018 at 11:16 am
Just another lousy picture with the reviewer far more talented than the filmmakers.
February 2nd, 2018 at 9:04 pm
I grant that if I had seen this at age 10 when it came out in a theater it might have more impact, but first seen as an adult on video I’m afraid its charms were lost and subsequent viewing didn’t improve it a lot.
PHANTOM OF THE RUE MORGUE from 54 with Karl Malden and Steve Forrest does have some effective moments, in fact it is my favorite telling of the Poe story on screen — despite Merv Griffin’s role in it.
HORROR’S OF THE BLACK MUSEUM isn’t awful, but it doesn’t add up to much despite all Michael Gough can do.
It isn’t really smug to call a bad movie bad, even with tongue-in-cheek. I could have been much harder on the film, pointing out Bergerac had the charisma of a well formed rock, and in a film that needed at the least a Lugosi or Von Stroheim in the lead his wooden presence did nothing to further the proceedings.
That’s an opinion, and if it is smug, it is a smugness earned from watching thousands of films over six decades and studying and learning from them.
If we can’t have a little fun at the expense of a film like this one what are we supposed to do with it, God knows it offers little enough entertainment value on its own?
February 2nd, 2018 at 10:22 pm
David,
A Burt Reynolds and Catherine Deneuve said to one another, and; more than once, in Hustle: Bingo!
February 2nd, 2018 at 11:41 pm
Of course it’s useless to repeat the lack of historical perspective employed here. There was NOTHING like this, Psycho, Peeping Tom previously. So yes, it, Gosh, may have had greater impact then. But that was sixty years before the faux ironic superior attitude that drove me out of theatrical revivals.
And no, it didn’t need an obvious ham actor in its lead. Literally an earlier era and approach.
February 3rd, 2018 at 3:26 am
The tone of the last few comments has brought to mind a possibly off-topic story, which I’ll pass along here, FWIW.
Back in 1982, there was a British monster matinee titled Venom, which got some notice at the time for having a cast including (but not limited to):
Sterling Hayden
Oliver Reed
Klaus Kinski
Nicol Williamson
Susan George
Sarah Miles
Michael Gough
Rita Webb
… and I’m probably missing somebody, but there you are …
The “plot” concerned a kidnap scheme that goes awry when a poisonous snake is mistakenly delivered to somebody’s big house (it’s been a while, so the details are a bit fuzzy; sorry about that).
When Venom became available to TV, the review in Leonard Maltin’s annual Guide contained the following observation (quote approximate):
… Half of the famous cast appears to be drunk; the other half looks as though they wish they were …
That’s not how the review appears in more recent Maltin editions; this might be out of respect for the cast members who have since died (can’t say for sure).
As I said above, probably off-topic, but it is something to think about …
February 3rd, 2018 at 5:53 am
That was, rarely for Maltin, a cheap shot. No better than what’s passed for wit here. I’ve seen it, and FWIW, the cast is on its best behavior, despite what may have gone on behind the scenes. In fact, maybe TOO restrained…..
This was one of a few films that director Tobe Hooper was fired from. It probably wold’ve been more balls-out under him.
February 3rd, 2018 at 11:20 pm
Hi! How are You? Me every time I think I am over the hump over the cold, the next day I back to square one, the most bizarre cold that I ever had. I remember a few months back I watched this movie on-line and from the first scene, I said “Oh boy it will be awful and degrading to Humanity” It was a very strange movie and slow pace and it seems the Producers of this movie tried to make it suspenseful, but fail a bit. I wanted to see the movie for Alison Hayes, but She was mute most of the time, She did not do much but at the same time yes, it would of been a good movie from my point of view for Twilight Zone or shows in that genre of series, that movie should of lasted 30 minutes, there was a lot of waste time and the end took forever to its climax or lacks there of. Anyway for me it is 2 stars on 5. Jacques Bergerac did not do much more movies after that, He quit acting for an Executive Position with Revlon. with His face it was very good for Him to work for Revlon. Thanks for reading and take care and be healthy. God bless.