Mon 16 Jul 2018
A Science Fiction Review by Dan Stumpf: JACK FINNEY – The Body Snatchers.
Posted by Steve under Reviews , Science Fiction & Fantasy[9] Comments
JACK FINNEY – The Body Snatchers. Dell First Edition #42, paperback original, 1955. First serialized in Collier’s, November 26 – December 24, 1954. Reprinted many times. Adapted into film four times: (1) as Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956; Kevin McCarthy; directed by Don Siegel). (2) as Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1974; Donald Sutherland; directed by PHilip Kaufman). (3) as Body Snatchers (1993; directed by Abel Ferrara). (4) as The Invasion (2007; Daniel Craig).
The basis of a classic movie and many remakes, and a fine novel in its own right: vivid, suspenseful and full of implausibility about which the reader gives no damn.
The story is too well-known to outline here, so I’ll just say Finney does a clever job of starting out small (patients of a small-town Doctor complain that there’s something funny about their friends and family) and building to the kind of edgy action and trickling suspense that made Sci-Fi fun in the old days. He also manages to make a 190-page book about Alien Invasion seem leisurely — but not slow-paced.
But there’s a duality lurking around here, based on an off-hand bit mentioned in passing: Once the Pods have taken a human identity, they begin to lose interest in that person’s daily activities. (Naturally, being Pods, they’re more into spreading pod-dom or selling Amway or whatever.) So gutters need to be cleaned, the trash cans on Main Street don’t get emptied, storefront windows grow dusty, and the whole town takes on an air of seedy neglect.
Well, in 1954, when Finney wrote the book, all this was actually happening: as the Suburb and the Strip Mall began to replace the Small Town, that little icon of Norman Rockwell America became every bit as seamy and run-down as Finney describes. And in a very real sense, The Body Snatchers sings a requiem for the cruel death of a cherished memory. There’s an oddly heart-rending chapter where the hero walks through his town, thinks of what it was and sees what it has become, that should strike home with anyone who grew up in pre-war America (or, like me, in the tawdry shadows of big empty department stores, dusty restaurants and faded movie palaces) and it adds a dimension of compelling nostalgia to an already fine thriller.
The Body Snatchers deserves its rep as a taut thriller, but I shall treasure its melancholy edge long after the plot twists and chase scenes have passed from memory.
July 16th, 2018 at 6:01 pm
There is at least one scene in the first movie that touches on how seedy the town is becoming, but the nostalgic aspect is lost in the more political view the film takes.
There are scenes in the book no film has tackled that I would still like to see on screen even though there have been at least three fine adaptations of the story.
That mix of melancholy and nostalgia is also present in Finney’s other novels, especially his unique time travel novel.
Thanks Dan, the films of this one are so famous we sometimes forget what a fine writer Finney was, and how powerful the novel is even in comparison to the fine films.
July 16th, 2018 at 8:01 pm
I think I’ve read more of Finney’s stories percentage-wise than almost any other author. The top three would be Hammett, Chandler and Woolrich. But fourth in such a list is not bad place to be at all.
I haven’t read many of his novels, though, including this one. I think that after watching the first movie I decided I needn’t bother. It sounds as though that’s been a mistake.
Of the film versions, I’m torn between which of the first two is the better one. I never saw the third, and never knew the fourth one existed.
July 17th, 2018 at 2:59 am
Watching Doctor Miles Bennell arriving back home to a small American Town called Santa Mira to be greeted by his practice nurse Sally who informs him that most of his patients are desperate to see him ,only him ! ,gives the viewer an inkling that something is not right in Santa Mira.
Growing suspence as you realise the Towns inhabitants are being duplicated with the original being killed off by seeds from another world.
A shocking reminder that this is serious stuff when Miles goes for help along with his true love Becky Driscoll to sallys home only to find that she too as been replicated as she takes one of the seed pods up to the babys room announcing”no more tears”.
Going from one hiding place to another till Miles eventually escapes unfortunately Becky does not.
The narrative by Dr Miles runs sporadically through the film as he tries to make the Doctors from a nearby hospital believe his story and help save the world.
The book is a lot more in depth than the films and also more thought provoking ,the pods in the end floating up in to space to look for a friendlier planet where the inhabitants wont mind being killed off and replaced!!.
The 3 movies I have seen all have a different perspective of the book ,the 1978 version being the darkest with no hope for humanity.
I know its not War and Peace but its compelling reading ,with a somewhat happy ending a book to read on a rainy day curled up next to a log fire in the safety of home.
July 17th, 2018 at 1:16 pm
A fine review. May read the novel based on this. I have seen the first two movies and was always curious about the book. Your insight that is an elegy to passing era, one I remember well and is still with me makes reading the book quite an appealing prospect.
July 17th, 2018 at 10:05 pm
The book is about the alienation of the modern world, the films political allegories of their time, both valid, though the book has a more timeless quality.
July 18th, 2018 at 1:53 pm
Steve,
In addition to this Finney wrote another fine SF novel, the time travel classic TIME AND AGAIN (the sequel was good too), and two very taut and original caper novels 5 AGAINST THE HOUSE and ASSAULT ON A QUEEN, both made into good films.
July 18th, 2018 at 10:26 pm
I see that Assault On A Queen is on TCM tomorrow (Thursday) at 2:15 pm.
July 19th, 2018 at 1:47 am
Well worth another viewing. Thanks for the heads-up, Chuck.
July 20th, 2018 at 3:39 pm
I really do have to read this sometime. I’ve seen the first two movies many times–subsequent remakes were less impressive, never caught hold. It’s the basic idea that clicks–why do people suddenly just seem to fall in line with a bad idea? Why do your neighbors seem like aliens all of a sudden?
Kaufman made his remake work–arguably better than even Don Siegel’s film–by making it a metaphor for the collapse of the counterculture. You’re in this safe liberal enclave, San Francisco, and then it all falls apart.
Maybe we’ll be due for another one soon.