Tue 4 Dec 2018
Mystery Review: GEORGETTE HEYER – Behold, Here’s Poison.
Posted by Steve under Bibliographies, Lists & Checklists , Characters , Reviews[6] Comments
GEORGETTE HEYER – Behold, Here’s Poison. Supt. Hannasyde #2. Hodder & Stoughton, UK, hardcover, 1936. Doubleday Crime Club, US, hardcover, 1936. Dutton, hardcover, 1971. US paperback reprints include: Bantam, January 1973. Fawcett Crest, 1979. Berkley, July 1987. Also reprinted many times in paperback in the UK.
There was a time in the 1970s, I’d say, when every used bookstore that carried paperbacks had a shelf devoted to Georgette Heyer’s Regency romances. For all intents and purposes, she created the category. Many publishers put out two or three a month, all following the style, pace and mode of Georgette Heyer’s books Those were gentler times, and modesty prevailed. The category no longer exists. Like Gothic romances, publishers stopped publishing them quite a few years ago.
Heyer also wrote thrillers, twelve n all, four of them with Superintendent Hannasyde along with his trusty assistant Sergeant Hemingway, who if Behold, Here’s Poison is an accurate example, spent much of his time asking questions of the servants of the house.
Hannasyde’s problem in this book is two or maybe even threefold. Dead is the master of the house, one in which two overlapping but directly related families reside, and all of them had to put up with Gregory Matthews’ temperament and mean-hearted ways, or move out. There are plenty of suspects, in other words.
Problem number two: The doctor’s first diagnosis is that of natural causes, but when one family insists on an autopsy, the cause of death is discovered to have been nicotine poisoning. By t he time Hannasyde is called in, five days have gone by. No physical clues remain.
Alibis are also useless. There is no way to even determine how the poison was administered. It’s a tough case for any detective to crack, and Hannasyde has to admit so also, if only to himself and Hemingway.
But the dialogue between the squabbling and assorted family members is both wicked and delicious, particularly that of cousin Randall, whose sharp tongue exposes all of the false pretenses and facades of the rest of the family, much to the sophisticated reader’s amusement and pleasure. His barbs especially hurt since he is also the primary beneficiary of the dead man’s estate. He’s quite the character, Randall is, and one not easily forgotten once met.
The solution to the mystery is the weakest part of the book. The killer’s identity I’d say is impossible for the reader to discern on his or her own. The motive, at least. You might be able to figure who done it by the process of elimination, but what’s the fun in that?
The Superintendent Hannasyde series —
Death in the Stocks. 1935
Behold, Here’s Poison!. 1936
They Found Him Dead. 1937
A Blunt Instrument. 1938
The Inspector Hemingway series —
[all four of the above, plus]
No Wind of Blame. Hodder 1939
Envious Casca. Hodder 1941
Duplicate Death. Heinemann 1951
Detection Unlimited. Heinemann 1953
December 4th, 2018 at 4:57 pm
I prefer her non series mysteries though next I like the Hannayside and then the Hemingway books. All of them are notable for a certain wit and sharp observation as well as being good if not spectacular puzzles.
Her Regency novels aren’t Barbara Cartland (not to knock Cartland, just her work is more straight forward Romance) either. They are fairly smart, a bit racy (in a nice way), meticulously researched,and often have quite a bit of wit action and adventure in them. Her ability to create a complete world was such that SF conventions would have rooms dedicated to her and C. S. Forester simply as examples of building a fictional world through small detail without getting in the way of the story.
Most of her mystery novels are available for free download in e-book form and well worth reading if you like the classic British upper class mystery done with a bit of wit and bite.
PENHALLOW is a serious crime novel rather than a conventional mystery despite the manor house setting and darker than most of her work.
December 4th, 2018 at 5:32 pm
I agree with Steve’s point: that whatever their limitations as mystery puzzles, Heyer’s best books sparkle with with wit. This is especially true of “Death in the Stocks”, which just bubbles over with comedy.
Decades ago I read quite a few of Heyer’s historicals. As David says, they are well-done. Mystery lovers might like “The Talisman Ring”, which combines a light crime story, with Heyer’s historical settings. I also enjoyed “Power and Patch”, “Faro’s Daughter” and others.
December 4th, 2018 at 5:39 pm
Heyer isn’t a better mystery writer than any of her contemporaries in the field, but overall she is a better writer, a distinction that shows in the wit Steve, Mike Grost, and I discuss and in the sharp dialogue.
December 4th, 2018 at 6:24 pm
David’s mention of the Hemingway books reminded me that I completely forgot to include them also at the end of the review — the ones in which he was promoted and got sole credit for solving the case. (I’ve now added them.)
December 4th, 2018 at 6:41 pm
Meant to add that David’s comments brought back happy memories, when he talked of rooms devoted to Heyer at SF conventions.
It was other college students who told me about Heyer, years ago when I was in college. Even leant me books, said she was a good writer. They were right!
October 5th, 2024 at 6:27 pm
[…] Clothes in BooksDesperate ReaderLiterary PotpourriMy Reader’s BlockMystery File […]