Fri 15 Mar 2019
NGAIO MARSH – Enter a Murderer. Inspector Roderick Alleyn #2. Geoffrey Bles, UK, hardcover, 1935. Pocket Books #113, US, paperback, 1941. Reprinted many times in both hardcover and paperback.
The second Roderick Alleyn detective novel, and the first of many subsequent Ngaio Marsh mysteries to take place in the world of the London theatre. I don’t know the history of such things, so I’m only suggesting this, but could this be the first detective novel in which the victim is killed on stage in front of a live audience by a gun which is supposed to have fake bullets — but doesn’t?
If not, it has to be one of the first. And in the audience is none other than Inspector Alleyn himself, along with his friend Nigel Bathgate, a journalist whom he met in the first book in the series, A Man Lay Dead (1934). Bathgate has not only provided the tickets, but he stays close to Alleyn throughout the book as an unofficial Watson — until, that is, his friendship with the suspects makes him something of a liability, from Alleyn’s point of view.
And there are a lot of suspects, and where each of them were when there was an opportunity to switch the bullets is obviously a prime factor in the investigation that follows.
This early in Alleyn’s career, I don’t believe that Marsh had a very good handle on his character yet. I grant you that in large part we see him through Bathgate’s eyes, but the latter often seems genuinely surprised by some of Alleyn’s reactions to events, both major and minor, as they happen throughout the investigation. And in all honesty I was taken aback myself, just a bit, at a scene in which it seems he has fallen unduly under the spell of the play’s leading lady — and she still a suspect.
And here’s a curiosity. On page 86 of the Berkley paperback reprint I happened to I read this time, after Alleyn has questioned most of the people on and behind the stage when the shooting took place, he asks one of them to wait a little longer in the wardrobe room. Nothing is heard of the latter from that point on until the inquest takes place several days later, and then never again.
All in all, in spite of the lapse above, Enter a Murderer remains highly readable, but it’s also nowhere nearly as sharp or knock-your-socks-off clever at the game of fair play detection as Agatha Christie was, back in the mid-30s when the book was written. Of course, no one else was either, then or now.
March 15th, 2019 at 6:20 pm
I tried to read Marsh, but could not pass the first few pages. Yet, I enjoyed the movie series. Like you I am also a fan of Mrs. Christie.
March 15th, 2019 at 8:09 pm
One of the most commonly used blurbs on the cover of Marsh’s paperback reprints is “She writes better than Christie.” (You may be able to make it out at the lowest at the top of the lowermost cover images I added to the review.)
I’ve never agreed with that statement, as many times as I’ve seen it. I don’t know why so many people put down Agatha Christie’s writing ability. I’m fascinated by how well she not only gets the scene of her stories established so well, but her characters even more so.
March 15th, 2019 at 8:57 pm
Alleyn was Marsh’s great strength, the most attractive of the great sleuths and the most traditionally romantic. She couldn’t plot like Christie, lacked some of Allingham’s energy and humor, and wasn’t as good a writer as Sayers, but she carved out a niche with Alleyn of literate and entertaining mysteries and her knowledge of the theater and art world meant those books were always special.
I agree that Christie’s talents as a writer are often overlooked. The cleverest plots in the world wouldn’t matter if you didn’t have some involvement with the characters and the writing stunk. I would say Marsh, like Sayers, and even Allingham is more consciously literate than Christie, but that doesn’t make them better writers, just different.
Frankly I don’t think any of the others could pull off a Christie plot just as I don’t think Christie could create a character as attractive as Lord Peter or Alleyn, or be as funny as Allingham (Christie could not have written TIGER IN THE SMOKE either). Each had their own strengths, but for my taste Christie’s set of strengths overall produced more classic and entertaining works though the others all have their own moments unique to them.
March 15th, 2019 at 9:18 pm
Could not agree more about Christie, David.