Wed 12 Jun 2019
A Movie Review by Jonathan Lewis: TOBRUK (1967).
Posted by Steve under Reviews , War Films[3] Comments
TOBRUK. Universal Pictures, 1967. Rock Hudson, George Peppard, Nigel Green, Guy Stockwell, Jack Watson. Screenwriter: Leo Gordon. Director: Arthur Hiller.
You have to review the movie that you watched, not the one you wished you’d seen. Such is the case with Arthur Hiller’s Tobruk, a war film helmed by a director best known for his cinematic adaptations of the works of Paddy Chayefsky and Neil Simon. While it’s a completely solid movie and adheres closes to the tropes of the “North African Second World War desert combat film” sub-genre (I made that up), the plot and dialogue never quite match the unique possibilities offered by the following premise. “A Canadian-British soldier who shuns heroism teams up with an idealistic German-Jewish commando to take destroy the Nazi oil depot in Tobruk, Libya.”
Sounds like you’d have a good tale to tell, right? How two men from disparate backgrounds must find common ground in order to achieve a greater good that transcends their differences. How one man learns the value of sacrifice and heroism and finds, under the glare of the unforgiving desert sun, what it means to fight a cause worth fighting – and dying – for.
But no. That’s the film I wish I had seen. Now, there are indeed flashes of potential scattered throughout the movie. There’s a powerful exchange in which Bergman (George Peppard), the German-Jewish commando explains to his Canadian counterpart, Major Donald Craig (Rock Hudson) what the war effort means to the Jewish people.
And there’s the mention, too often forgotten today, of how Egyptian officers and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem were scheming to team up with the Nazis against the British in Egypt and Palestine. But all of this great material is ultimately wasted as the film bogs itself down in mild, inoffensively didactic lessons about human prejudice.
Now, you may be asking yourself: why watch Tobruk after everything I just told you? Simple answer: the atmospherics and the combat scenes. Hiller does an exceptional job in staging the latter and gives the viewer a real powerful jolt to the senses.
There’s the obligatory scene in which our hero (Hudson) attacks Nazis with a flamethrower and there’s also a beautifully crafted scene in which the Allies scare away a band of Arab tribesmen looking to exchange two prisoners for guns. The soundtrack, by Polish composer Bronisław Kaper, who also scored Gaslight (1944) and Mutiny on the Bounty (1962), works seamlessly with this visual material and gives it a gritty, sweaty feeling.
June 13th, 2019 at 9:57 am
Interesting that you didn’t mention the screenwriter here.
Tobruk was written by Leo V. Gordon.
… and yes, it’s the same Leo Gordon who was a glowering bad guy in many, many westerns and crime films from the ’50s onward …
… and who also wrote many TV episodes and Roger Corman movies (while maintaining his acting career all the while) …
… and who was married for 50 years to a glamorous actress named Lynn Cartwright (you’d likely know the face) …
… and who had many unlikely adventures over the years unrelated to showbiz …
… and who before all of this served a prison term for armed robbery (but that’s another story ) …
… just enter his name in the search box and see for yourself, OK?
and who
June 14th, 2019 at 12:08 am
Mike
Thanks to your urging, I’ve been adding screenwriter credits more often than I used to. I started to this time, but I got distracted, didn’t, and I’ve been on the road all day.
So having come to rest for the evening, I’ve just added him. Better late than not at all!
June 15th, 2019 at 8:13 pm
Gordon is good in the film too as Peppard’s sergeant, as is Stockwell in a fairly obvious bad guy role, but Green comes close to stealing the whole film in that last scene and speech on the beach when his stiff, all business, prejudiced British officer redeems himself.
Peter Rabe wrote the novelization, which opened the plot up a bit in some of the very areas Jonathan suggested. I still recall it as one of the better screen novelizations I read.
Had this been made a few years earlier it might have been a classic, but by the time it was in production a strong anti war sentiment was at play in how such stories were told and the lessons about prejudice were no doubt added to help win over audiences who might otherwise find a gung ho action war film harder going than just a few years before.
The film should have been in the Guns of Navarone vein as an action adventure or a taut true story, instead it tries to split the difference between the two and loses its way a bit, but some of the big action scenes were well enough done that they were used as stock footage in war films for years after.