Wed 8 Dec 2010
Archived Movie Review: THE PLOT THICKENS (1936).
Posted by Steve under Mystery movies , Reviews[12] Comments
THE PLOT THICKENS. 1936. James Gleason, ZaSu Pitts, Louise Latimer, Owen Davis Jr., Richard Tucker. Based on a story and characters created by Stuart Palmer. Director: Ben Holmes.
The role of Hildegarde Withers in this next-to-the-last movie based on her adventures with Inspector Piper was taken over from Edna May Oliver then Helen Broderick by ZaSu Pitts, whose fluttery hands and ways are best taken in small doses. She seems to fit the part, however, given Hollywood’s perspective on the stories.
This has come up before, and in the meantime I’ve given this some small amount of thought to it — the business of detective stories being made into comedies when converted to the silver screen, especially during the 30s and 40s.
Maybe it’s because the idea behind the traditional, cozy detective murder mystery is inherently ridiculous to begin with — the established routine of a victim, suspects, clues, questioning, locked rooms, alibis and so on.
Could it be, when transferred into cinematic terms, the whole entire unlikelihood of the proceedings is amplified into the utterly absurd?
That’s the question as I’ve reformulated it so far, and I haven’t answered it yet, but why else did so many favorite mystery characters turn into bumbling idiots when portrayed on the screen?
Or why did their adventures need to “enlivened” by the presence of goofy chauffeurs, clown-like cops or (simply) funny friends? Hard-boiled operatives fared much better. I don’t think Hollywood had a very great opinion of the Ellery Queen’s or Hildegarde Withers(es) of the literary world.
Which is not to say that I’m bitter — but wouldn’t it have been better to have had Jean Arthur play Pam North than Gracie Allen? Wouldn’t Sara Haden (Andy Hardy’s Aunt Millie) have made a better Hildegarde Withers? (It could have been worse — they might have used Marjorie Main.)
This not being an ideal world, however, simply the best of all possible ones, we accept what we’re given. As the title indicates, there’s a lot of plot in this one: first of all a murder, with lots of suspects, including a butler and a jealous boy friend. There also turns out to be a stolen emerald in the dead man’s possession, and the whole affair ends up in a museum where the famous Cellini cup is the target of a gigantic gang of thieves.
Simply terrific stuff!
James Gleason, as Inspector Oscar Piper, is a pint-sized bantam with an irascible temper and even fouler-smelling cigars. As a detective, well, it’s no wonder he had Miss Withers along to do his thinking for him.
[UPDATE] 12-08-10. When I wrote this review, I was unaware of a made-for-TV movie in which Miss Withers (Eve Arden) and Inspector Piper (James Gregory) were also the leading characters. It was A Very Missing Person, based on the novel Hildegarde Withers Makes the Scene by Stuart Palmer and Fletcher Flora. Shown on ABC, 4 March 1972, rumor has it that it was not as good as it might have been.
And a fact that was totally unknown to me until just now, according to Wikipedia, there was a 1950s TV sitcom pilot entitled “Amazing Miss Withers” that starred Agnes Moorehead and Paul Kelly. It is apparently considered lost, probably forever.
December 8th, 2010 at 9:00 pm
Alas, Marjorie Main did play the Hildegarde Withers character, although the name (and marital status) was changed from Withers to O’Malley in MRS. O’MALLEY AND MR. MALONE, based on a Stuart Palmer/Craig Rice collaberation.
December 8th, 2010 at 9:45 pm
Jerry
Looks like you caught the “in joke” there, and I didn’t. Zipped right over my head, it did, even though I wrote it in the first place!
— Steve
December 9th, 2010 at 11:35 am
There could be a whole article/discussion devoted to miscasting of actors in movie adaptations and TV updates of series detectives. An “I’d rather see (suitable actor/actress) as (famous detective)” kind of thing. For instance: I’d love to see the Gladys Mitchell books done right. Diana Rigg’s impersonation was suitably sardonic in the UK TV adaptations about five years ago, but not at all the ancient nasty crone that Beatrice Bradley is in the books.
I remember watching that Eve Arden movie. It was updated to the 1970s. No period flavor. And bad. There was an made-for-TV update of I LOVE A MYSTERY with Ida Lupino done in the 1970s, too. Had a kind of “Batman” campiness about it. Seemed inescapable for that era.
December 9th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
I did love Gleason as Oscar Piper in the ones with Edna May Oliver (who reportedly had an affair with Clark Gable, believe it or not).
December 9th, 2010 at 12:56 pm
John
I’ll have to see if that Eve Arden-Miss Withers movie is available anywhere. I trust your judgment that it was bad. Sometimes you start to wonder, though, just how bad. (Well, I do.)
I did not care for the Mrs. Bradley TV series with Diana Rigg at all, even though I’ve so far only watched the first one. Nice atmosphere, very poor mystery, to my way of thinking.
Jeff-
Clark Gable hooked up with Edna May Oliver? Who reported that? Anybody we can trust?
— Steve
December 9th, 2010 at 1:34 pm
The first Gladys Mitchell film was relatively faithful to the book, though they made both Mrs. Bradley and the daughter attractive, apparently on the belief that everyone, especially women, should be better looking on television. But it rather damaged the plot, in my opinion. The actor playing George the chauffeur was quite good, but implying he was having it off with Mrs. Bradley again went against the book.
From what I understand the later adaptations went completely off the rails, as far as fidelity to plot went.
December 9th, 2010 at 3:54 pm
I saw the second half of this film on TV years ago.
Keep hoping it returns.
Likely based on:
The Riddle of the Dangling Pearl (1933)
in the collection Hildegarde Withers: Uncollected Riddles (collected 2002).
December 9th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
I suspect that the practice of goofing up whodunnits for the screen had a lot to do with the studios being afraid to produce something that didn’t fall perfectly within a well defined genre. A detective mystery is not a thriller or suspense story or action movie. My guess is that by adding the comedy element, they thought that they were offsetting the intellectual elements of the story.
Oliver was the perfect emobodiment of Miss Withers, but then Miss Withers was based upon Edna May Oliver, at least according to Palmer.
December 9th, 2010 at 6:39 pm
Horror films from the period often had “comic relief” (often merely tiresome) as well.
December 9th, 2010 at 11:48 pm
Wasn’t comic relief a normal part of most B-movies?
Perhaps the true appeal of the comedy mystery arises from the opposite aspects of the two genres. The mystery is about restoring order to the universe, while comedy is about the chaos of the universe. Putting the two together can make easy, hopefully entertaining conflict. Since most A-movies were serious dramas adding a silly comedy mystery as the B-movie may have increased the appeal to a variety of moviegoers.
December 10th, 2010 at 12:26 am
Most noir films in the 40s were B-movies, were they not? And most noir films had very little comic relief. The same with most straight chase and adventure movies.
That left the straight detective mystery to be stuck with the comedy filler, as far as Hollywood saw it, and that’s what bugs me. Even the Holmes movies had their bumbling Watson moments.
But to tell you the truth, this is an observation more than a complaint. When the comedy’s done well, as in many a Charlie Chan movie, you’ll hear nothing out me and this quarter.
Well, not too much, anyway.
December 10th, 2010 at 12:49 am
I think in some of the later Chans the comic relief is the best part!