Fri 10 Jan 2020
Archived PI Mystery Review: THOMAS CHASTAIN – Vital Statistics.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[6] Comments
THOMAS CHASTAIN – Vital Statistics. J. T. Spanner #2. Times Books, hardcover, 1977. No paperback edition.
Relatively few private eye novels appear any moe, and those that do often seem to have their existence pend soley on minor variations from the standard format. This one’s told in present tense, for example, but one soon learns to ignore that. The only other distinguishable feature is that J. T. Spanner’s office help consists of his two ex-wives, with both of whom he maintains most cordial relations.
The case itself concerns a missing stewardess and the mutilated body of an unidentified young woman. Are they the same? The underlying background and mood are provided by the living entity called New York City, the provider as well of a myriad interesting facts and figures.
Although nothing new really develops, it is a smooth and convincing effort, the only jarring moment coming with a distastefully violent means of forcing a final confession.
Bibliographic Notes: Spanner’s earlier case was entitled Spanner (Mason/Charter, 1977). There was not a third. Among his other crime novels, Chastain wrote five books about Max Kauffman, a Deputy Chief Inspector of the N.Y.P.D, including an appearance in the first Spanner book, and two additional cases for Perry Mason, written after the passing of Erle Stanley Gardner.
January 10th, 2020 at 5:02 pm
Thanks for the warning about present tense. It’s something that I’ve found I just can’t ignore, alas.
January 10th, 2020 at 7:59 pm
I’m with you. I suppose there are instances when writing a novel or even a shot story in present tense makes sense, but it hardly ever does to me, a reader. And the older I get, the more likely I will not read the aforementioned novel or story. Obviously I read this one, but I thought necessary to point it out. Nowadays, if I find a present tense story in the latest EQMM, for example, I just skip it. There are plenty of other stories to read.
January 10th, 2020 at 8:15 pm
This book was praised by John Dickson Carr.
I enjoyed it too, when reading it decades ago.
January 10th, 2020 at 9:47 pm
I have read writers who pull off the present tense, but they tend to be more literary types, and even there it is not something I seek out.
January 11th, 2020 at 5:15 am
I included this in my 2010 list of:100 Good Mystery Novels, here at Mystery*File:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=4968
January 11th, 2020 at 9:27 am
Looking at the other 99 books on your list, Mike, that’s very good company indeed.