Sat 25 Jul 2020
FLYNN or BARRYMORE? Two DON JUAN Movies Reviewed by Dan Stumpf.
Posted by Steve under Films: Drama/Romance , Reviews[5] Comments
REVIEWED BY DAN STUMPF:
DON JUAN. Vitaphone/Warners, 1926. John Barrymore, Mary Astor, Warner Oland, Estelle Taylor, Montagu Love and Nigel de Brulier. Screenplay by Estelle Taylor. Directed by Alan Crosland.
THE ADVENTURES OF DON JUAN. Warners, 1948. Errol Flynn, Viveca Lindfors, Robert Douglas, Alan Hale, Romney Brent, Robert Warwick, Una O’Connor and Raymond Burr. Screenplay by Herbert Dalmas, George Oppenheimer, William Faulkner, and Robert Florey. Directed by Vincent Sherman.
Errol Flynn and John Barrymore were close friends and legendary drinking buddies in life, whose paths twice crossed professionally: Flynn’s portrayal of Barrymore in the turgid biopic TOO MUCH, TOO SOON (Warners, 1958) won praise from critics who panned the rest of the film, and he himself said, “I wanted to show a man with a heart, a man eaten up inside — as I knew him to be in those final days when I was close to him.â€
Ten years earlier, when Warners decided to remake Barrymore’s DON JUAN, Flynn was the natural—indeed, the only—choice for the part. Under Vincent Sherman’s workmanlike but uninspired direction, it emerged as a gaudy but oddly lifeless affair, with footage “borrowed†from ROBIN HOOD and THE PRIVATE LIVES OF ELIZABETH AND ESSEX, and Flynn visibly tired of the whole swashbuckling-lover act. The supporting players do what they can, a phalanx of writers throw in some witty lines, and stuntman Jock Mahoney even recreates Barrymore’s staircase leap from the earlier film, but on the whole the tale of swordplay and palace intrigue seems profoundly shallow.
In contrast, the original DON JUAN is an altogether more personal and livelier effort. Barrymore’s first appearance as the legendary lover doesn’t come till twenty minutes into the film, after an extended prologue featuring the star as Don Juan’s father, betrayed by his wife, who entombs her lover in a wall, then devotes himself to wine and women till he’s murdered by a discarded mistress and leaves his son with a parting dictum never to give love; only take it.
Prologue over, Barrymore makes a light-hearted entrance as Don Juan, skillfully manipulating two ladies at his door while a third slips out his bedroom window. Very soon after, he runs afoul of the Borgias: Warner Oland as Cesare (“We Borgia approve of cleverness in our friends – we have no clever enemies!â€) and Estelle Taylor as a predatory Lucrezia. It seems the toxic siblings plan to poison Mary Astor’s dad and marry the girl off to barely-civilized Montagu Love, but Juan/John squelches the cyanide, then beats the lustful bridegroom in one of the finest swordfights ever in the Movies: imaginatively conceived and cleverly edited, it ends with an impressive swan dive down a flight of stairs, so good it was repeated in the later film.
There’s a lot more plot of course, but one aspect of this thing intrigues me. Early on, as I said, Don Juan’s father seals his wife’s lover up in a wall, and sets his son on a path of loveless and rather misogynistic pleasure. Later on, imprisoned by the Borgias, Juan takes down a wall to escape … and on the other side he finds an erstwhile victim: the husband of a woman he seduced, who went mad with jealousy and murdered his wife. In a surprising twist, the madman forgives and helps Juan escape so he can rescue Mary Astor etc. etc.
Okay, if we can divorce the whole “Wall†thing from the current political climate, it becomes a striking metaphor for our hero’s psyche. The wall his father built entombed a philanderer and became a barrier that kept the legendary lover from actually loving anyone. It is only when he destroys a wall that Don Juan finds forgiveness and becomes capable of love.
The screenplay never spells this out—Thank Gawd!—but it adds a special depth to DON JUAN that THE ADVENTURES OF DON JUAN never achieved… or even attempted.

July 25th, 2020 at 9:51 pm
The Flynn version has a number of inside jokes at Flynn’s expense, and that stunt is the one that made Mahoney the “King of the Stuntmen” at that time, largely because in both cases there are few safety measures taken, or possible. Miss and you have up a messed up star or stunt man.
If you look you will note Mahoney also as one of Don Juan’s cadets in earlier scene.
I believe the Flynn version is the last film Max Brand worked on before his death. He is better known as a screen doctor, and his only other Flynn credit was for Flynn’s UNCERTAIN GLORY. He was the highest paid screenwriter in Hollywood for several years, working almost solely uncredited on troubled scripts. At one time Brand was being paid more as a screenwriter than Clark Gable was as a star.
Other than the stunt, and the irony of Barrymore (and later Flynn) playing the role, the Barrymore version was probably best known at the time for being released with a film score, I think the first film released with its own sound score though three years later Jolson came along in the JAZZ SINGER.
July 25th, 2020 at 9:58 pm
Cannot disagree more about the Flynn version and Vincent Sherman’s work; outstanding. If the jokes were at Errol’s expense, he picked up that tab willingly. The drama, built around Viveca Lindfors worked beautifully. In face her best work and certainly most attractive on screen.As for Mahoney’s stunt, would have meant nothing or even less, had Errol not set it all in motion.
July 25th, 2020 at 10:07 pm
And while applauding excellence, leave plenty of room for Max Steiner’s score.
July 25th, 2020 at 10:36 pm
Barry,
I did not mean to belittle Flynn for the inside jokes, he almost certainly laughed harder at them than anyone else, and the film works largely because of his presence and the self deprecating humor he brings to what he certainly saw as an ironic role (as Barrymore must have).
I think it is one of his better acting performances since he brings to it a world weary recognition of who he is perceived to be by audiences and who he really was. Almost every scene has a dual meaning and interpretation yet Flynn never lets that get in the way of the fun he seems to have doing it.
Critics and I agree with you that the Flynn version is better than the Barrymore, though I wish he had a leading lady as gifted as Astor in this one. Lindfors is attractive, but her part is impossible.
It is his last swashbuckler at Warners, and a fitting coda to his others, only lesser in comparison to films like BLOOD, ROBIN HOOD, and SEA HAWK. Taken on its own, as all films should be, it is quite entertaining.
Today it is best remembered for that stunt, shorted as the least of his Warner’s swashbucklers rather than being a fitting farewell to that aspect of his career (though he did a few decent ones in Europe).
Not bad villainy in this one either from Douglas and Raymond Burr, and that is always another plus.
July 27th, 2020 at 9:51 am
I like the Flynn version very much. The Steiner score was reused in ZORRO, THE GAY BLADE. The sets won an Oscar.