Tue 11 May 2021
A Movie Review by David Vineyard: THE WIFE OF MONTE CRISTO (1946).
Posted by Steve under Films: Drama/Romance , Reviews[8] Comments
THE WIFE OF MONTE CRISTO. PRC, 1946. John Loder, Lenore Aubert, Fritz Kortman, Charles Dingle, Eduardo Ciannelli, Martin Kosleck, Fritz Feld, Eva Gabor. Screenplay by Dorcas Cochran, Edgar G. Ulmer, and Franz Rosenwalk (Francis Rosenwald) suggested by the novel by Alexandre Dumas. Directed by Edgar G. Ulmer.
Almost from the start there were sequels to Alexandre Dumas mega selling The Count of Monte Cristo including The Daughter of Monte Cristo and The Treasure of Monte Cristo by Jules Lermina published orginally as by Dumas himself. The Wife of Monte Cristo is not a sequel, but a retelling, adding a dash of Zorro and casting Haydee, Dantes Indian ward who is a key part of his revenge plot, as the wife of the title.
The time is 1832, the place France where corrupt government is opposed by the mysterious masked man known as the Avenger. The Prefect of the Police, de Villefort (John Loder) has two reasons to stop the Avenger, one he ruined his father, the other because he is the head of the corrupt elements in the governent backed by the wealthy Danglars (Charles Dingle) and Malliard (Fritz Kortman) who are both part of a plot to sell contaminated medicine during an outbreak of fever.
De Villefort has set a trap for the Avenger, and it very nearly works when his men ambush the Avenger and his hand is wounded. Now de Villefort is sure he has the man he suspects is the Avenger, the mysterious and wealthy Edmund Dantes, the Count of Monte Cristo (Martin Kosleck).
Monte Cristo manages to outwit de Villefort, going out of town to his hunting lodge and leaving his beautiful wife Haydee (Lenore Aubert) in charge and in contact with the Avengers legion of men.
But de Villefort still suspects Monte Cristo and the only way to keep him off balance is if the Avenger appears while Monte Cristo is gone so Haydee chooses to don the mask and black costume of the masked hero.
Meanwhile de Villefort, still certain Monte Cristo is the Avenger, romances Haydee enlisting Mme Malliard (Eva Gabor) in his game to set a trap for the count. But for a time Haydee manages to outwit him, even capturing, putting on trial, and executing Malliard under de Villefort’s nose (in the best sequence of the film shot in smoky dark inns, wine cellars, and on Parisian roof tops), which results in Haydee being arrested, and now it is up to Monte Cristo to return from his hunting lodge and free his wife and avenge his honor as de Villefort has discovered from his spy (Fritz Feld) Monte Cristo is Edmund Dantes.
All this is standard cloak and dagger, and done on a low budget, but in this case done stylishly by director Edgar G. Ulmer who takes a fairly strong script, an interesting and intelligent heroine in Aubert, who is convincing equally in cape and mask and low cut gown, a dashing and despicable villain in Loder, and a surprisingly dashing and adept hero in Kosleck, who is off screen for much of the film, but returns in time to outwit de Villefort and confront him in his own palace in a well staged duel to the death. Considering Kosleck is best remembered for low budget villainy he is quite good as the swashbuckling mystery man.
A better than usual supporting cast of Kortman, Dingle, Gabor, Ciannelli, Anthony Warde, and Feld add to the fun while Bruce Lester and Robert J. Wilkie are unbilled in small parts.
Virginia Christine has a nice bit as a woman who hides Monte Cristo from the soldiers.
Mostly it is Ulmer who makes this worthwhile. While I don’t quite hold with the auteur theory of Ulmer’s genius, he was capable of making the most of a low budget, poor lighting, inexpensive sets, and a feel for German Expressionism. Here the directors eye and ability to make the most of very little combined with a decent cast and the usual mix of desirable women, flashing swords, swirling cloaks, and masked heroes works better than you might expect.
This is by no means a great film, but it holds its own with better known and better financed sequels to Monte Cristo like the two Louis Hayward outings The Return of Monte Cristo and The Son of Monte Cristo. Considering those two are well respected among fans of swashbucklers that’s saying quite a bit for this film.

May 11th, 2021 at 7:50 am
Definitely watchable, despite the scene where a coach races past a stately old building and the cardboard pillars sway.
May 11th, 2021 at 10:31 am
Martin was wonderful as Monte Cristo. He should have done more in this kind of thing. I spoke to Edgar about it, and he was pleased with the overall effect as well. Add Lenore Aubert to that wonderful list.
May 11th, 2021 at 12:16 pm
Martin was probably closer to the figure of Edmond Dantes resurrected as Monte Cristo and described by Dumas. Taking that a step further, and bearing in mind that at the conclusion of the Dumas novel, Edmond and Haydee sai away, never to be seen again. My theory relative to the original is that Edmond and Monte Cristo are inspired by the actual resurrection, and Monte Cristo is the Christ, at least in Dumas’s mind. And mine.
May 11th, 2021 at 7:16 pm
Barry, agreed on Kosleck and Dumas Dantes/Monte Cristo. I didn’t go into it, but in the book the first appearance of Monte Cristo is fairly vampiric looking, dark, pale, and mysterious.
It’s a shame this wasn’t a bigger budget film for all involved, but it works wonderfully despite, as Dan points out, some obvious budget problems even clever directing can’t hide.
Your theory on the relationship between Monte Cristo and Christ is interesting, and without looking it up I’m trying to remember how many men were on the boat that rescued Dantes after his escape (disciples of a sort) and wondering if the Abbe isn’t a John the Baptist figure.
With a little work (neither of us wants to devote) a decent bit of literary criticism could be developed on the theme.
But re Kosleck I would have loved to have seen him have more on screen time in this even though I would not have wanted less of Aubert, or Loder and Kortman who are all fun to watch here.
May 11th, 2021 at 11:02 pm
Swell review,
Orson Welles Mercury Radio ‘Theater On the Air!’ players took their turn at Monte Christo. Intricate feat to boil down the huge story into whatever minuscule minutes. Welles is effective as the imprisoned man.
Available on archive.org
May 12th, 2021 at 4:58 am
I have not seen the movie, but in the book she is Greek.
May 12th, 2021 at 9:35 pm
Terry you are right. Don’t know why I said Indian. Aubert never seems to be anything but French, and the entire plot about Haydee testifying in court to ruin one of Dantes enemies is missing. Here she is just his wife.
May 15th, 2021 at 8:58 pm
Few things are more visually scintillating than an expertly-choreographed, studio-era sword fight. It is poetry in motion.
I remember ‘Scaramouche’ with relish. ‘Prisoner of Zenda’, ‘Mark of Zorro’, is anything more rousing?