Tue 28 Dec 2021
A 1001 Midnights Review: JOHN CROWE (aka DENNIS LYNDS) – Bloodwater.
Posted by Steve under 1001 Midnights , Reviews[4] Comments
by Marcia Muller
JOHN CROWE – Bloodwater. Buena Costa County #3. Dodd Mead, hardcover, 1974. No paperback edition.
John Crowe is one of Dennis Lynds’ several pseudonyms — others include William Arden, Michael Collins, Mark Sadler — and his Buena Costa County is fictional, a synthesis of many of the places and characteristics of Lynds’ home state of California. That, however, is as far as unreality figures in these excellent novels. The characters are deeply and well drawn, the procedure is accurate, the plots are plausible and logical.
A prominent citizen of Monteverde, one of the county’s elegant suburbs, is found dead of gunshot wounds in a seedy motel room. The gun is his own; the name he registered under is not. Detective Sergeant Harry Wood of the Monteverde Police Department has a special interest in the case, since he and the dead man, Sam Gamet, were both on the force together before Garnet climbed through the ranks of the security department to the vice-presidency of a local corporation.
Wood’s investigation takes him into the homes of the rich and socially prominent of the area; into the offices of powerful corporation executives; and into the past of a family that is desperately attempting to conceal a secret. The satisfying solution links diverse aspects of the case, both from the past and the immediate present.
Other titles in this series: Another Way to Die (1972), A Touch of Darkness ( 1972 ), Crooked Shadows ( 1975), When They Kill Your Wife (1977), and Close to Death (1979).
———
Reprinted with permission from 1001 Midnights, edited by Bill Pronzini & Marcia Muller and published by The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 2007. Copyright © 1986, 2007 by the Pronzini-Muller Family Trust.
December 28th, 2021 at 9:49 pm
I wasn’t as fond of this series as some of Lynds’ others, but he is never less than interesting.
December 29th, 2021 at 12:01 am
I read one, found it interesting, but it didn’t have much of a follow through, since while I continued to collect them, I never read another. It was better than OK, of course, but like you, not one of my favorites of Lynds’ various series.
December 29th, 2021 at 11:16 am
I’ve only read ‘act of fear’, which left me feeling as follows: “It was okay. And by okay I mean this: the story was solid, the characterization was good, the prose was fine, the detective (Dan fortune) likable enough. But Lynds has a tendency to tell us rather than to show us. He’s the anti-Hammett. If you got rid of Fortune’s internal monologue and his soliloquies you could easily cut the length of the book in half. And there’s a bunch of very mediocre philosophizing about life I just don’t care about. Not offensive like Spenser’s pontificating about maleness—just boring, run of the mill shit you might hear from some overly loquacious drunk suffering an acute case of logorrhea.â€
December 29th, 2021 at 11:26 am
Now that’s what I call an honest opinion. Not mine, but who’d want to agree with me all of the time?