Mon 21 Nov 2022
A Mystery Review by Tony Baer: ROSS THOMAS – Chinaman’s Chance.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[4] Comments
ROSS THOMAS – Chinaman’s Chance. Arthur Case Wu & Quincy Durrant #1. Simon & Schuster, hardcover, 1978. Avon, paperback, 1979. Mysterious Press, paperback, 1988.
A few years ago some dude named Malcolm Jones (who I’ve never heard of) shared his top ten list of crime novels. All the ones I’d already read were great, lending the list some credibility. The ones I hadn’t have been great too. Chinaman’s Chance made the grade. So I was impelled to try it out.
A ramshackle ramble by the seat of its pants, the story is an entertainment. A wonderful entertainment. And of perhaps all the novels I’ve ever read, it deserves that moniker. It strives to be nothing other than entertainment. And it succeeds. Wonderfully and wonderfully vacuous.
There are so many plot threads that it will be hard to relay them in linear, straightforward fashion. God knows that Thomas didn’t try to do it. And yet it is the multiple perspectives and slowly eked out details that makes the damn thing so tantalizing, anticipated and delicious.
I’ve read that Woody Allen only gives his actors their own lines to remember and they have no idea how the whole script fits together. That’s the feeling you get from the characters here. No one has the whole picture. Everyone has just a little piece. And the story reveals itself like a picture puzzle put together, piece by piece, before your eyes. But this picture puzzle you bought came in a blank cardboard box. So you have no idea ahead of time how the thing is supposed to look.
In fact I’d be surprised if Thomas knew ahead of time how it all was going to fit together. If he did, and outlined it all ahead of writing it, then he’s a freaking genius. If not, then he’s really really lucky. Because all of the pieces in this 5000 piece puzzle fit. Even though it seems like he’s manufacturing the puzzle pieces right before your very eyes.
But hey. I’ll have a try at linear summary.
Artie Wu and Quincy Durant are soldiers of fortune. Back when the Vietnam war was petering out, there was money to be made. An associate of theirs at the US Embassy, Reginald Simms, was given orders to burn the 12 million in U.S. currency on hand. He burned 10 million of it.
The other two mil? Simms and his college roommate, a major mafia figure, ‘buy’ the political machinery of the small broken down coastal town of Pelican Bay in Southern California.
The dream? To build a red-light district version of Epcot Center: “[S]in without sorrow and thrills without danger…. You can go from Paris to Berlin…. to Singapore to Hong Kong to Marseilles to London’s Limehouse to San Francisco to New Orleans to New York to wherever you have ever dreamed of going. It will all be within this four block square area, and whatever you have dreamed of finding in those places you will find here — carefully sterilized for safe consumption…. People don’t want the real thing… because the real thing has bad breath, and sweaty armpits, and sometimes steals your wallet and makes you hurt when you pee. What people want is vice and sin that look the way they look in the movies — and that’s exactly what we intend to give them.”
So what’s wrong with it? Well maybe nothing in principle. But the devil’s in the details. And whether the end justifies the means.
Part of the means involved screwing over Artie Wu and Quincy Durant back in Vietnam. Including getting Durant’s fiancé murdered by the Viet Cong.
And part of cleaning out the old Pelican Bay political machinery involves killing a Congressman opposed to graft. And the Congressman’s wife. And the Congressman’s mistress.
So that’s basically the story. It’s about Artie Wu and Quincy Durant seeking vengeance and a cool $2 million coming up against the mob.
It’s supremely entertaining. And another thing that surprised me is how Tarantinoesque the thing is. And it predates Tarantino by more than a decade. So the phrase shouldn’t be Tarantinoesque. Tarantino is being RossThomaseque. It’s all there: the combination of brutal violence and slapstick comedy.
There are a number of great scenes so it’s hard to pick one to illustrate the point. But my favorite involves a couple of hitmen who’ve taken their target in a Winnebago, intending to throw him off a cliff near Pepperdine University. They lecture the murderee on having made bad career choices. Then they are distracted as it dawns on them that Pepperdine’s campus appears in The Six Million Dollar Man! The murderee leverages their distraction by grabbing a can of gasoline and setting them on fire while the Winnebago flies off a cliff.
So yeah. It’s like that. And if it sounds like your bag, give it a read. It’s a great movie to watch in the theater of your mind. Grab the popcorn.
November 21st, 2022 at 4:49 pm
In spite of all the potential, only a couple of Thomas’s novels have made the transition to either the movies or TV. A film called ST.IVES after the leading character was made of THE PROCANE CHRONICLE which was written by Thomas as by Oliver Bleeck. (Charles Bronson played the title role.)
And a TV miniseries was made of BRIARPATCH by the USA Network, which I missed when it was on. (The leading character was changed from male to female.) It’s streaming now on Amazon Prime, but apparently you have to pay for it. (I may just do that.)
But in any case, there are a lot of Thomas’s books just crying out to be done on either the big or small screen.
November 21st, 2022 at 10:57 pm
That patchwork style is not uncommon in Thomas, but here I always thought he sat out to basically do his own version of CASABLANCA where nothing really fits or seems to go anywhere, but actually all somehow falls together however hard to summarize the full plot.
The dialogue in this one sparkles like a well written screenplay.
It’s easy to imagine that like the actors in CASABLANCA the characters in CHINAMAN’S CHANCE (that title doesn’t help any chance of it being filmed today) must have wondered just where it was all going.
I agree it feels very Tarintinoesque now, so much so I’m surprised no one ever handed a copy to Tarantino and dared him to film it.
I agree too it is one of the most sheerly entertaining books of its kind ever written. It is on a lot of top ten lists including mine.
Conventional wisdom holds a book, particularly genre fiction, can’t work with more than one or two “created characters” in it, fully realized characters. In a Thomas novel you seem to stumble over one every third page.
I suspect the reason Thomas isn’t usually filmed is that his plots tend to be pretty loose relying on colorful characters that would likely overwhelm most scripts (there was talk at one time of Steve McQueen playing McCorkle).
I mean who could possibly play Otherguy Overby right?
Durant and Wu appear in a sequel making them aside from the Oliver Bleek books about St.Ives, the only series characters other than his early McCorkle and Padillo in Thomas work.
Ironic when you think about it, that at the time Thomas and Bill Grainger, both ex newspaper men out of Oklahoma City and Chicago respectively, were the first American’s to really challenge the British in the realm of the Spy and Intrigue and Adventure realm. They were the first to manage to marry the same degree of sophistication and toughness the Brits managed.
Charles McCarrey and Robert Littell would nail the serious side of the equation and William F. Buckley would make a good pass at his own 007, but Thomas and Grainger even received that praise from the Brits.
November 22nd, 2022 at 10:18 am
Loved CHINAMAN’S CHANCE, one of my favorite Thomas books, along with THE FOOLS IN TOWN ARE ON OUR SIDE.
Skip BRIARPATCH, by the way, television version.
November 22nd, 2022 at 8:38 pm
Amazon’s asking price is $1.99 per episode, or $16.99 for the full season of 10 episodes. Right now I think I’ll pass.