Wed 2 Oct 2024
A 1001 Midnights Review: KEN FOLLETT – Eye of the Needle.
Posted by Steve under 1001 Midnights , Reviews[6] Comments
by Susan Dunlap & Bill Pronzini
KEN FOLLETT – Eye of the Needle. Arbor House, US, hardcover, 1978. Signet, US, paperback, 1979. First published in the UK as Macdonald and James, London, 1978, as Storm Island. Reprinted many times since. Film: United Artists, 1981, with Donald Sutherland and Kate Nelligan.
Eye of the Needle is one of the best of the recent spate of World War II espionage novels. Ken Follett combines a very believable plot based on astounding. historical fact with excellent pacing and-a real boon in this type of thriller-well-rounded. sympathetic characters.
The historical fact is that in 1944 the Allies created a fake army in southeastern England. To Nazi reconnaissance planes. it looked like a huge encampment set to invade France at Calais. But seen from the ground, the “barracks” had only one side and a roof; the “airplanes” were mere carcasses sunk into the ground. with no engines or wheels. It was a hoax of gigantic proportions that convinced the Nazis to concentrate their defenses at Calais instead of Normandy, and it affected the outcome of the war.
But this outcome would have been very different had there been one German spy who saw the phony encampment al ground level and reported it to Berlin. Suppose there had been such a spy. a master spy, an upper-class German, somewhat of a rebel, who refused to join the Nazi party but still had the ear of Hitler. Suppose such a spy had lived in London long enough to pass as an Englishman ….
This is the central premise of Eye of the Needle. Here Follett gives us Die Nadel — the Needle — who uses a stiletto to kill anyone who threatens his mission or his cover. He kills as a soldier; he doesn’t enjoy it. In a moment of self-inquiry. he wonders if his personality — the ever-present wariness that keeps him at a distance from everyone else — has really not been foisted upon him by his occupation, as he likes to suppose; perhaps, he thinks, he has instead chosen his profession because it is the only type of work that can make him appear normal, even to himself.
Such self-doubt (although it is a luxury the Needle rarely permits himself) has us at least nominally on his side for much (but not all) of the novel, even as the British agents — a typically tweedy ex-professor named Godliman and a former Scotland Yard man named Bloggs — match him in intelligence and quickly realize he has discovered their great hoax.
With this discovery, the chase becomes faster and more desperate. Circumstances lead Die Nadel to a storm-battered island in the North Sea, where a frustrated young woman, Lucy Rose, and her wheelchair-bound husband (he lost both of his legs in a traffic accident) live in bitter isolation and where much of the novel’s action takes place.
Lucy’s attraction to the Needle, her fear and revulsion when she finds out what he is, and finally her desperate struggle to keep from becoming his latest victim make for some the best edge-of-the-chair suspense writing of the past decade. (The 1981 film version starring Donald Sutherland and Kate Nelligan has its moments but unfortunately falls far short of the novel.)
Follett’s success with Eye of the Needle led to a number of other best sellers, none of which has the same raw powe1 and tension. Those other thrillers include Triple (1979), The Key to Rebecca (1980), The Man from St. Petersburg (1982), and On the Wings of Eagles (1983).
———
Reprinted with permission from 1001 Midnights, edited by Bill Pronzini & Marcia Muller and published by The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 2007. Copyright © 1986, 2007 by the Pronzini-Muller Family Trust.
October 3rd, 2024 at 5:20 pm
Can’t recall ever having seen a Follett yarn reviewed ’round here. Pleasant surprise.
The novel is a cracking good read. As are most of KF’s romps.
Follet –former journalist, I gather? –anyway, whatever faults one might want to lay at his door –nonetheless he did one thing well. And maybe its the most crucial thing. Somehow he always found a way to keep his narration spry and sprightly.
Never seen him misstep in this knack of his. The pace of a Follett plot is always brisk and confident.
Even if he re-uses little bits’n’pieces of his concoctions from one title to another (and he sure does); it’s forgivable because he always packages everything up so well.
Err I suppose either he did or his editors did. I think he’s being ghost-written now, right?
Ah well. Enjoying all the imagery in the above review. Well done.
October 3rd, 2024 at 8:28 pm
p.s. Now I’m settin’ here thinkin’ bout Follett thrillers.
As I recall, what made ‘Needle’ such a fascinating writer’s construct was that in reality, the Nazi spies inserted into the UK were fumbling, bumbling, and incompetent. They were all rounded up with no effort.
Whereas, ‘Man from St. Petersburg’ had some faint credibility, and ‘Key to Rebecca’ was based on an actual cunning and capable Nazi spy in Cairo. Can’t think of his name, sry.
But KF’s “Triple” is the standout as far as I’m concerned. A real shocker. I was astounded by that read. The Israelis did actually hijack a ship in the Med. Outlandish.
Follett’s other works on Afghanistan & Iran (respectively) are also commendable admixtures but I don’t know how accurate they are. Each one needs separate examination. Better men than I must speak to their merits.
Interesting, that the OP review makes no mention of the publishing powerhouse Follett eventually became with his medieval history series. Maybe the critique of ‘Needle’ was penned before that came to be.
I can’t even imagine how many millions the Follett estate amassed in later years.
October 3rd, 2024 at 8:39 pm
Ken Follett’s Wikipedia page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Follett
Among other things it says that Needle won an Edgar from the MWA, and that his books have sold in total more than 160 million copies.
Apparently he is still living, having been born in 1949. The most recent book I found listed there is The Armour of Light, which came out last year. (It’s historical fiction.)
October 3rd, 2024 at 10:55 pm
Whew! I sure din’t know he was still among us. Now that is surely one author (of whom) I’d like to shake the hand.
From what I can tell, KF did a lot of unusual work under pseudonyms. ‘Amok’ by “George S. Fox”? is a rip-roaring WWII horror. Such as one rarely sees.
And –he even may have had a hand –in Peter Hyams’ ‘Capricorn One’ which is such a beautiful little thriller. I don’ know if it’s true Follett was involved. It’s rumored, though.
October 5th, 2024 at 5:56 pm
Interesting that with all his success with thrillers, when he wanted to write his historical stories his publisher was not pleased. Obviously he won out, and his historical thrillers have done better than his earlier books. His historical books are huge (800 pages or more), and to me his characters talk in a more “today” language than in that time, but still doesn’t detract from the story.
October 6th, 2024 at 11:04 pm
re: @ msg #5, agreed. But I gotta hand it to Follett though, for whetting-the-appetite of the reading public on the topic of 12th century architecture. He really pulled off a deft little maneuver there, to the benefit of many. Who’d have thought it?
Another Follett quirk: his apparently irrepressible interest in graphic sex scenes. Nearly every title he pens, has one. A real hoot. He seems to take great delight in this.
What intrigues me more, is the work he does under pseudonyms. There’s some evidence he wrote the screenplay for Peter Hyams’ “Capricorn One” which I love madly.
And then there’s this “George S. Fox” author, who wrote the bizarre weird-war yarn, “Amok”.
I no canna make sense of Follett’s multifarious subterfuges.