Sat 1 Feb 2025
A 1001 Midnights Review: DICK FRANCIS – Blood Sport.
Posted by Steve under 1001 Midnights , Reviews[2] Comments
by Thomas Baird
DICK FRANCIS – Blood Sport. Michael Joseph, UK, hardcover, 1967. Harper & Row, US, hardcover. 1968. Berkley, US, paperback, 1969. Reprinted many times since.
From the winning world of British steeplechasing (where he was Champion Jockey in 1954), Dick Francis moved effortlessly into crime fiction with his first novel, Dead Cert, in 1962, and continues to be a front-runner. He has written twenty-some excellent thrillers full of old-fashioned moral polarity with strains of humor. These “adventure stories” (as Francis calls them) have amazing plots of clever evilness and feature nonrecurring heroes familiar with the racing game.
Flawed, uninvolved, and soulless, each central character finds the value of vulnerability and returns to the land of the living through courage and love. As a central theme, it can be compared to that of the works of Ross Macdonald. As critic John Leonard said, “Not to read Dick Francis because you don’t like horses is like not reading Dostoevsky because you don’t like God.”
In Blood Sport, death lurks on a simple Sunday sail on the Thames. An American visitor is almost drowned, and his rescuer is convinced that it wasn’t simply an accident. Gene Hawkins, the rescuer and hero, is an English civil servant, a “screener” who checks employees in secret-sensitive government jobs, His training permits him to spot details that make “accidents” phony, and his knowledge of guns and listening devices comes in handy.
The rescued man asks for help in locating a stolen horse that has just been bought for a huge price. Hawkins is relieved to use his vacation time to hunt for missing horses, because he is despondent, filled with a “fat black slug of depression.” This is the only part of his character that doesn’t ring true-after all, it’s only a failed love affair.
The pace picks up, and the scene changes to the U.S.A. From the farms of Kentucky, the trail is followed to Jackson, Wyoming. Along the way. Hawkins gets people together for some psychological reconditioning and exposes a bloodline scam as the scene shifts to Santa Barbara, Las Vegas, and Kingman, Arizona. The U.S. tour is fast moving, and Francis docs not dwell on local-color background, especially not to make any points. He just gives the graphic, journalistic details of a place that push the story along.
———
Reprinted with permission from 1001 Midnights, edited by Bill Pronzini & Marcia Muller and published by The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 2007. Copyright © 1986, 2007 by the Pronzini-Muller Family Trust.
February 2nd, 2025 at 12:44 am
I recall in MORTAL CONSEQUENCES Julian Symons devoted a chapter at the end to Francis predicting, correctly as it turned out, that the future of the genre lay with Francis mix of action, adventure, mystery, and suspense and that he would become the new Agatha Christie in terms of sales and importance.
He wasn’t wrong.
Most writers who tried Francis formula couldn’t quite master it the same way he did though Douglas Rutherford had some success in the UK with his motorcycle themed book, and John Lawrence and Bernard Cornwell with sailing.
Like the many imitators of John D. MacDonald’s Travis McGee most just didn’t have it in them to get the right mix of voice, action, insight, plot, detail, and setting.
I had the pleasure of meeting Dick once and even corresponded with him some, and he sent me autographed copies of his books for years, but his arthritic hands meant he couldn’t both write and correspond much, even with the help of his wife Mary and son Felix.
One of the qualities of his work most other writers couldn’t match was his appeal to women readers. Whenever I mentioned his name in a book store, sell, or library I would inevitably be surrounded by women readers speaking up about how much they liked his work. That appeal to both sexes was a key to his success.
February 2nd, 2025 at 1:12 pm
A long comment that I won’t attempt to reply to in full, but let me first say that I agree with you. What’s true about all great writers is that each is unique in their own particular way. Those who try to follow in their footsteps, that’s where they stay. In their footsteps.