Sat 3 May 2025
Archived Mystery Review: JOHN D. MacDONALD – Free Fall in Crimson.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[11] Comments
JOHN D. MacDONALD – Free Fall in Crimson. Travis McGee #19. Harper & Row, hardcover, 1981. Fawcett, paperback, 1982. Reprinted a number of times since.
I’ve been doing some research. The first Travis McGee story was entitled The Deep Blue Goodbye, and it was published first as a paperback in May of 1964, back when a book sold in softcover would set you back all of forty cents or so.
It’s now exactly seventeen years, eighteen books, and an equal number of colors later [1981], and real money, the folding kind, is going to be what it takes to get your hands on a copy of the latest in the series. [$10.95] No more loose pocket change!
This negative sort of progress notwithstanding, what this does is to illustrate one of the most remarkable aspects of John D. MacDonald’s long writing career. Ignored by the critics until just recently, he began in the late 1940’s writing hundreds of stories published in the pulp magazines {and mostly still buried there). In the 1950’s, with the demise of the pulps at hand, he switched to novels, with a list of them fully a page long, but all of them in paperback and in paperback only.
Only in the last five or ten years has it been that his books have come out first in hardcover, and now when they do, they head straight for the bestseller list. Readers have known all along. They’ve known that MacDonald’s name on a story has meant just what they’ve been looking for.
Today, of course, MacDonald is best known for his adventures of Travis McGee. Other than myriads of articles for TV Guide and blurbs for the dust jackets for the books of other authors, he seems to be writing nothing else. It seems a little strange for those of us who’ve been with him all the while, but apparently McGee is enough to keep the demands of the vast majority of his legions of fans satisfied.
The format is restricting, but given the continued storytelling drive of a Free Fall in Crimson, plus the usual amount of free-wheeling MacDonald-ian philosophy thrown in for good measure, it seems unlikely that any change is due in the near future.
In the opening chapters, McGee is still mourning the loss of Gretel, lost but then avenged when last we met him, in The Green Ripper. He is doing a lot of thinking about “destiny,” and not until this new case comes along does he extricate himself from the deep, self-induced funk he’s dug himself into.
He is asked to investigate, long after the fact, the strange death of an artist’s estranged father. The man was dying of cancer, but perhaps not fast enough, for before he does, he is beaten to death by persons unknown in an isolated wayside rest area. His heir is his wife, from whom he was legally separated. Her current boyfriend specializes in making R-rated biker movies, but his latest films have not been faring well.
McGee’s solution, when it comes to it, as it always does, is to give fate a handy shove in the right direction. Fate’s response, as is usual in JDM’s books, is tough and uncaring. Unfortunately, McGee neglects some loose ends this time, and as a result, in the next book it will be his best friend, Meyer, who will need some rehabilitating.
In the Travis McGee universe, it is not wise to stand too close to the target area.
Rating: A minus.
May 3rd, 2025 at 8:09 pm
If only there was less of the “street philosophising”! It got worse as the series continued: MacDonald, and therefore McGee, seemed to have opinions about everything under the sun, no matter how trivial. The views, in particular the “sexual healing” stuff (which is seemingly neverending!) haven’t aged well at all, and to me it all becomes very tedious very rapidly. I skim the opinionating and get back to the story as quickly as possible.
May 3rd, 2025 at 8:50 pm
I have to agree with you. Not necessarily in regard to this particular book, but to the series as a whole, as time went on. Travis McGee was heady stuff back then, but over the years he has somehow has lost his way. I tried a book in the run a few months ago — one earlier than this one — hit the midway point, put the book down, and never picked it up again.
May 3rd, 2025 at 9:20 pm
pretty telling that a hardcover in in 1981 would cost $10.95, now some of the bestsellers are over $30.00. Most Ebooks even cost more than $11.00
May 3rd, 2025 at 10:27 pm
I have to tell you, $10.95 for a hardcover in 1981 was a small fortune. I’m no longer buying books, only selling, but you’re right. $30 for a hardcover mystery today is still a small fortune.
(I no longer remember why I decided to make such a large point about pricing back when I first wrote this review, but I decided to keep it in when I reprinted it earlier today. I’m not sure why.)
May 4th, 2025 at 1:56 am
I’ve enjoyed MacDonald’s one-shot novels immensely, but fatuous Travis McGee put me off. Everyone–even a writer–is entitled to his/her opinions, but I don’t care to squander my precious youth reading them.
May 4th, 2025 at 7:21 am
McGee was a hero for his time. And probably for his time only.
May 4th, 2025 at 9:00 am
I was a big JDM fan in my late teens and early 20s, but had cooled off by 1981. I think I read FREE FALL at the time but to tell the truth, I don’t recall anything but the hot-air balloon. JDM’s dated social observations and opinions have relegated McGee to history, but another factor was the big shift that occurred in crime fiction in the ’80s and ’90s, whereby villains became crazier and less predictable, and lone-wolf heroes like McGee less believable. The post-WWII era (say, 1946 to 1976) was the golden age of American literacy, when paperbacks were affordable and the working class still prized education.
May 4th, 2025 at 1:04 pm
If there is an author who is riper (shall we day) for a masters thesis or PhD dissertation, I cannot think of one more appropriate for the honor than JDM.
May 6th, 2025 at 1:36 pm
The joke about McGee becoming increasingly a Rotarian’s idea of a hippy over the years certainly held true, but I still could enjoy even the late McGees…if not nearly as much as I did THE EXECUTIONERS and other works from the height of his career (particularly given how dumbed down the film versions, both CAPE FEARs, were of that cited standalone).
May 10th, 2025 at 11:38 pm
Merely out of sheer contrariness I should mention many of us read JDM for the street philosophizing as we read Ross Macdonald for the lyrical simile and metaphor no matter how studied they sounded coming out of Lew Archer who is not a Canadian academic like his creator.
Spending time with McGee was as much of the reason most people I knew read the books as plot or suspense. “California Sunbunius” is sexist today, but no one ever coined a better term for a type of young blonde tanned beach girl that was a big part of the culture at the time in life and on the screen big and small. MacDonald was a remarkable observer of the world as it was then, not as it should be or would be, but as it was, flaws and all (including his and McGee’s). If he and McGee were sexist the times were sexist, if they weren’t as politically correct as modern readers, the times weren’t politically correct.
Opinionated? I would kill to find a writer as human and honest about his flawed humanity as JDM who was opinionated in that same wary self-deprecating way.
I suppose I have more patience for McGee because as a narrator he never tries to convince us or win us over, he is who he is, an admitted tarnished knight, not more honest than he has to be, mean spirited sometimes, often too quick to judge people (particularly women), bad at relationships, and a bit immature. Neither McGee or MacDonald are preaching, they are a guy sitting next to you in a bar with just enough drinks in them to start getting a little philosophical and then recognizing they are pontificating, laughing at themselves, and buy everyone a drink to make up for it.
I can’t think of any of the big names in the genre today who can come anywhere near that level of human interaction and still make their hero a fantasy figure. Too many of them have all the humanity of a plywood plank.
I can’t think of a single genre writer today worthy of winning the National Book Award for a thriller, MacDonald did, and no one said he didn’t deserve it.
May 10th, 2025 at 11:47 pm
Well argued, David. Huzzah!