Wed 24 Sep 2025
SF Diary Review: DAMON KNIGHT, Editor – Orbit 3,
Posted by Steve under Diary Reviews , Science Fiction & Fantasy[10] Comments
DAMON KNIGHT, Editor – Orbit 3, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, hardcover, June 1968. Cover art by by Paul Lehr, Berkley S1608, paperback, September 1968. Cover art also by Lehr.

Damon Knight has gone off the deep end, I’m afraid, in his search for literary excellence in SF. Of these nine selections, two have straightforward stories to go with their messages, and of the other seven, only one has any message which seems important enough to be reading about. Maybe we should be grateful that most of these others are the shorter ones. ***
RICHARD WILSON “Mother to the World.” Novelette. The story. combined with personal diaries, of the last couple in the world, with an added twist. It is well that Martin Rolfe has a basic love and understanding for animals, since Siss, while a normal woman in all other aspects, has the mentality of an eight-year-old. Consideration slowly becomes love, as we watch, hoping that nothing happens to spoil it, and a family is begun. A family that may have a future. (5)
RICHARD McKENNA “Bramble Bush.” Novelette. Knight was right the first time: that is, I did not understand a word either. It is remarkable that an author makes no concessions to the reader in the interpretations of his visions. Here is an example, however, with theories of the fourth dimension. (0)
JOANNA RUSS “The Barbarian.” Novelette. Alyz meets a fat man who may or may not be a time traveler, but who is someone who thinks he is the master of his machines, yet who in his foolishness is inferior to Alyx. Confusing story, but a message lurks somewhere. (4)

GENE WOLFE “The Changeling.” Knight doesn’t understand this, shall I argue? The [relatively] high rating is based not on the possibility there might be a meaning, but on the reminiscences of small town life. (2)
DORIS PITKIN BUCK “Why They Mobbed the White House.” Why indeed? I thought this story might explain. Something about computers and income tax. (1)
KATE WILHELM “The Planners.” A glimpse into the life of the head of a research project which is trying to stimulate the intelligence of monkeys. But a glimpse is all. (2)
PHILIP JOSE FARMER “Don’t Wash the Carats,” What does it mean if a “literary Rorschach test” is nothing but nonsense to you? (0)
JAMES SALLIS “Letter to a Young Poet.” Well, that’s what it is. What did you expect? (3)
JOHN JAKES “Here Is Thy Sting.” Novelette. A newspaperman discovers a scientific project probing the experience of death from a qualitative approach. Of the two essential parts, the sleep and the pain, which is it that mankind fears? And if the fear of the pain were to be eliminated, what would be the effect on the future of mankind? And why was this story described as funny? Or amusing? ****½
September 24th, 2025 at 9:55 pm
Another story by story review of this collection can be found here:
https://sciencefictionruminations.com/2016/03/26/book-review-orbit-3-ed-damon-knight-1968/
In general, the reviewer found more to most of these stories than I did, and on occasion, vice versa.
I do not know how these stories would fare with me today, but I suspect they might rate about the same. Probably not higher than I did then, when I was quite younger
September 25th, 2025 at 5:07 am
The stories rate much higher with me today, although if, I remember correctly, some of my reactions echoed yours way back then. The Wolfe, the Wilhelm, the Farmer, and the Sallis all deserve much higher marks. Knight had been insisting that SF should be judged by literary merits and the ORBIT series was one way to prove it. Some readers, including me, were too callow to realize or accept this at the time; luckily, other readers were more mature and accepting and the series continued until volume 21.
September 25th, 2025 at 10:49 am
I read one of the ORBIT books when it was new (not this one) and my reaction was the same as yours: off the deep end. Not to my taste at all. I reacted like that to most of the New Wave SF and still do.
September 25th, 2025 at 6:20 pm
I skimmed through a later ORBIT not too long ago, but I didn’t stay with it long enough to gain much to say about it. The stories in the series are hit or miss with me, ranging from rather too high to way way too low for me. As for the New Wave, as it existed back in the 60s and 70s. I didn’t mind authors writing it, nor other readers enjoying it, but all in all, we think alike, James. It wasn’t meant for either of us.
September 27th, 2025 at 3:09 am
I generally like all of the writers represented here, but none of the stories seems familiar so I can’t judge.
Jakes seems a bit out of place in that company to be honest though I enjoyed many of his SF works.
September 28th, 2025 at 9:11 pm
I recently had a post devoted to ORBIT discussion: https://socialistjazz.blogspot.com/2025/08/saturdays-very-early-wednesdays-short.html
September 29th, 2025 at 11:09 am
Thanks for the link, Todd. Very very interesting. Just another reminder as to how controversial the New Wave was back then.
September 29th, 2025 at 11:47 am
Looking at the ISFDB, I think it was ORBIT 5 that I read. It has Norman Spinrad’s story “The Big Flash” in it, and I remember it. Don’t know where else I would have read it. None of the other stories sound familiar at all.
September 29th, 2025 at 12:37 pm
I remember that story too, but like you, I don’t remember where I read it. For me, it might have been Donald Wollheim’s World’s Best Science Fiction for 1970. It was a long time ago.
October 5th, 2025 at 12:37 pm
Possibly the Wollheim//Carr WORLD’S BEST SF annual for 1970 (where I first saw it)? Or James Gunn’s survey anthos, vol.3, THE ROAD TO SCIENCE FICTION: FROM HEINLEIN TO HERE? But, then, there’s no lack of other anthologies and at least one Spinrad collection which included it Back When: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?41610