Sun 25 Jan 2009
Reviewed by Kevin Killian: MABEL SEELEY – The Listening House.
Posted by Steve under Authors , Bibliographies, Lists & Checklists , Crime Fiction IV , Reviews[7] Comments
MABEL SEELEY – The Listening House.
Doubleday Doran/Crime Club, hardcover, 1938; reprinted, 1953 [25th Anniversary of the Crime Club]. Paperback reprints include: Popular Library #69, 1944; Mercury Mystery 45, digest-sized, n.d.; Pyramid R-1009, 1964, plus several later printings.
It’s hard to believe that The Listening House, one of the cornerstones in the Haycraft-Queen collection, has been out of print for so long and that it isn’t a book everyone knows.
Perhaps the problem is that Seeley wrote only a handful of books (nine, not all of them mysteries) and stopped writing when she was still fairly young — she lived until 1991 but her last mystery book appeared in 1954. It might be a regional thing too, for she was resolutely set in her native Minnesota.
And then again it might be that, for all her other charms, Seeley never again wrote a book as fine as her first, though she copied the title again and again so that she had during her lifetime the sort of brand name loyalty Travis McGee novels had, or in our own day Sue Grafton. Seeley’s other books include The Chuckling Fingers, The Beckoning Door, The Crying Sisters, and The Whistling Shadow.
In The Listening House a young woman, fired from her job and down at her luck, rents a cheap room from a huge old creepy rooming house that is set on the very edge of a steep overlook, and tenants throw their garbage off the back side of the building.
Gwynne Dacres is not your ordinary ingenue heroine. She has been married, she’s capable of taking care of herself, for the most part, she has managed to surmount the Depression. The Great Depression is a tactile, living thing in this novel, a character as important as any of the crime victims or killers.
Gwynne’s new landlady, old Mrs. Garr, is a terrible old tarantula of a woman, out of a Balzac novel, sitting on her cellar steps half the day and night, waiting, waiting, waiting, but for what? In the meantime a man’s body is found (by Gwynne) dumped, like an old load of dry goods, into the trash area at the bottom of that long cliff-like drop.
Mrs. Garr’s terror is unfeigned, and we are not surprised, but horrified, and maybe even moved to pity, when the ghastly old lady is the second corpse whose body Gwynne discovers.
There is plenty of horror or terror or what have you in this book, but it is also a fairly clued mystery with roots in a socio-sexual crime that occurred some twenty years back, during the days when police corruption in “Gilling City” allowed vice to run rampant.
Seeley’s no-nonsense honesty about the harsh realities of what today we call “sex work” distinguishes her book from any other that I know of published in the late 1930s. It has a harsh, biting, Faulknerian edge to it.
(I was thinking one of the reasons Seeley has faded from view is that none of her books was ever made for the movies — Irving Wallace made The Chuckling Fingers into a 1958 episode of the TV anthology series Climax! — and I can see that The Listening House is far too sexually frank for Hollywood of the late 1930s.)
In addition to the sex-crime horror, which remains pretty disgusting even in today’s considerably degenerated world of “torture-porn” writing, Gwynne herself is torn, though in an amusing and sophisticated way, between the love of two very different men, a newspaper publisher, and the cop investigating the murders.
(She accidentally meets the first one while he’s wearing only his boxer shorts, doing chin-ups in his apartment, so she gets a long view of his bare torso and hairy forearms and legs — sort of the “meet cute while naked” introduction Ellery Queen used to give his cute male characters.)
Some have called Seeley’s plot marred by “coincidence,” but I don’t read it that way. Certainly many of the tenants had reason to kill their evil landlady — but it’s because they followed her there, to track her down, it’s not as if it were all some accident that so many of the characters had some ties to the 1921 disappearance and suicide of the unfortunate Rose Liberry.
I think Seeley is painting a picture pf a complex society in which crimes against women are endemic because they’re built into the system, they’re the mortar which holds the bricks together in an edifice larger than a listening house.
Too bad her other books aren’t as good, but she did make up for a disappointing run by a sharp and exciting finale: The Whistling Shadow, which is like the William Irish/George Hopley book that Woolrich never wrote.
___
Bibliographic data: [Taken from the Revised Crime Fiction IV, by Allen J. Hubin; various paperback editions are shown.]
SEELEY, MABEL (Hodnesfield). 1903-1991.
The Listening House (n.) Doubleday 1938.
The Crying Sisters (n.) Doubleday 1939.

The Whispering Cup (n.) Doubleday 1940.

The Chuckling Fingers (n.) Doubleday 1941.
Eleven Came Back (n.) Doubleday 1943.

The Beckoning Door (n.) Doubleday 1950.

The Whistling Shadow (n.) Doubleday 1954.
January 27th, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Back in the day, when I collected hardcover mystery first editions and specialized in Crime Club, THE LISTENING HOUSE was an extremely tough book to find — especially in jacket and in grade. I remember being quite eager to buy and read it, and finally Otto Penzler came up with a sharp copy for me. Maybe I’d expected too much, based on the book’s rep, but it just didn’t impress me. I’ve long since sold the jacketed first, but I still have a G&D reading copy and am inclined to give HOUSE a second try based on Kevin’s review.
January 27th, 2009 at 9:48 pm
I forgot to add that of Seeley’s other Crime Club novels, first editions of CRYING SISTERS and ELEVEN CAME BACK seemed to be very common — almost absurdly so. I assumed that Seeley print runs were considerably larger following the surprise success of LISTENING HOUSE.
January 27th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Ed
You collected Crime Club’s too? I never knew that. At one time my goal was to collect them all, and I was most of the way there until I started looking through them more carefully and decided I really was never going to read a fair amount of them.
But my big mistake was not looking for them in nice condition with jacket, as I’m sure that’s what you did. My aim was simpler, just to obtain them all, then to upgrade as I went.
I still have a good proportion of Crime Club’s output, but only about half have jackets, and 90% of those are from 1945 on. A good percentage are ex-library also.
My excuse was (is) that I’m a reader first and a collector second. To the first end, I’m an accumulator.
My memory agrees with yours on the later Mabel Seeley books. Most Crime Club editions went directly to libraries. I think Seeley’s were among the few that must have “broken out” of that mold and were purchased directly by readers.
In any case, I’m glad to say that my collection of Crime Club’s was what helped inspire Ellen Nehr to do her complete bibliography of all the books they ever published. She missed two or three, as I recall, but I think it was the first time anyone tried to do a book like it.
— Steve
April 18th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I have just finished reading Woman of Property and enjoyed it immensely. Do you know the name of the other non-mystery written by Seeley?
April 18th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Donya
According to http://www.bookfinder.com, she wrote a book called The Stranger Beside Me (Doubleday, 1951). I don’t know anything about it, but it’s easy (inexpensive) to obtain. (Follow the link.)
I hope this helps!
— Steve
January 14th, 2012 at 7:24 pm
I just read an original edition of The Listening House. I couldn’t put it down. It had been in my (unread)possession for over 50 years! It is one of the books that belonged to my mother and was given to her by a friend in 1943. My mother had made a note inside the book of the dates that she had reread it. I am sure I will too. One of the most enjoyable books I have read in a long time! It would make a wonderful motion picture!
March 21st, 2012 at 4:09 pm
I enjoyed the book (and the review) quite a lot except for the novel’s ending, which struck me as somewhat anti-climactic. Still, it had a nice blend of suspense and wit, especially thanks to the heroine. In fact, I far preferred it to The Crying Sisters, which is well written but struck me as a bit grim. (Also, the heroine’s rapid attachment seemed forced, particularly as the child was pretty annoying.)
Thanks again for the fine review. There can never be too much publicity for good popular novels of the early-mid 20th century.