Thu 13 Nov 2008
A Movie Review by Walter Albert: BABY FACE (1933).
Posted by Steve under Films: Drama/Romance , Reviews[2] Comments
BABY FACE. Warner Bros., 1933. Alfred E. Green, director; Barbara Stanwyck, George Brent, Donald Cook, Alphonse Ethier, Henry Kolker, Margaret Lindsay, Arthur Hohl, John Wayne, Robert Barrat. Shown at Cinecon 41, September 2005.
This screening of the original cut of a pre-code film restored scenes that contributed to editing and re-shoots that the Hays Office demanded to make the film less morally reprehensible.
Stanwyck, in one of her most striking roles, plays a gold-digger who makes her way up the corporate ladder by seducing her bosses and moving to the next level when the opportunity presents itself. She leaves destroyed lives behind her until she reaches the top where she finds a love that restores her moral sense even as she loses almost everything she’s schemed for.
There’s a somewhat happy ending in both versions (with the ending more jarring in the edited version). Arthur Hohl is especially good as her depraved father, while a besotted Donald Cook is the most damaged of her conquests.
This is a black comedy whose taut direction and uniformly good performances keep it from veering into the absurd.
[EDITORIAL NOTE] Click here for a two minute trailer for the film, and here for nearly five minutes from the movie itself, courtesy of YouTube. — Steve
November 15th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
If I remember correctly, wasn’t Stanwyck’s father pimping her in his beer parlor? Pretty startling to me when I watched it. Otherwise very funny to see the camera move up the side of the building,level by level in the place she worked, as she was seducing each department manager to get to the top! I guess I should buy the complete collection of pre-code next time Amazon has a sale.
November 15th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
Paul
The long scene you’re thinking of, with the camera moving up the outside of the building as she works her way up in the inside, is a classic, all right.
Check out the second YouTube link that I added in my editorial comments. I’m sure it’s the one.
— Steve