Sun 13 Jul 2025
Archived PI Mystery Review: NAT EASTON – A Book for Banning.
Posted by Steve under Reviews[3] Comments
NAT EASTON – A Book for Banning. Bill Banning #7 (?), Boardman / British Bloodhound series, UK, hardcover, 1959. No US publication.
Bill Banning is so successful as a writer of crime fiction that he can be taken for a doctor by the Bentley he drives. He also, on the side, owns and operates a private detective agency, complete with a small staff of amateur, but dedicated, operatives.
In this, his fifth adventure, he’s hired by a worried aristocrat to find a book that’s mysteriously disappeared, claimed to contain forbidden official secrets. The man, as Banning quickly discovers, also has a nymphomaniac for a wife, and a pair of spoiled, but married, daughters.
Banning is not the brightest detective in the world. His secretary-assistant, Josie, seems to have the sharpest mind in the firm. Banning is also — how should I put this? — woman hungry. Sex starved.
This is all pretty much tolerable, but the last couple of chapters are mucked up something awful. The killer is fairly obvious, but the “book” is impossibly found in the wrong apartment, and the interview leading into the final summing up is badly set up.
Or was I just asleep already?
Rating: C minus.
NOTE: There were in all eleven Bill Banning books. The Goodreads list of the books is here. Nat Easton is assumed to be a pen name, but who actually wrote the books does not seem to be known.
July 13th, 2025 at 2:28 pm
Sometimes when I post an old review of an equally old British mystery like this one that was obscure even back then, I amuse myself by wondering whether or not I am the only person in the US who has actually read it.
Probably not so, but it is an amusing conceit.
July 18th, 2025 at 11:58 pm
Someday someone will write a good little book on the British private eye, but even then, I suspect Bill Banning and Eatson will be pretty obscure.
July 19th, 2025 at 8:51 pm
Since no one in the US has as yet has told me that they have read the book, I am going to continue to consider myself as the only one who has.
And that is the true definition of obscure.