Sun 31 May 2009
MIKE NEVINS on “Crime and Punishment,” Archie Goodwin, Playhouse 90, and Nicholas Blake.
Posted by Steve under Authors , Characters , Columns , Crime Films , TV mysteries[20] Comments
by Francis M. Nevins
A few weeks ago Turner Classic Movies presented yet another film of the Thirties which, had it been made in the Forties, would have been accepted by everyone as film noir.
I refer to Crime and Punishment (Columbia, 1935), based on Dostoevski’s classic novel. For obvious budgetary reasons director Josef von Sternberg makes no attempt to recreate mid-19th-century St. Petersburg, and we are told in an opening title that the story could take place at any time and anywhere.
This is why the protagonist’s name morphs from Rodion to Roderick Raskolnikov, and also why we never see any automobiles or horse-drawn vehicles or any other form of transportation that might give us a clue to whether we are in the 19th or the 20th century.
Amid grotesque shadows and bizarre camera angles, Peter Lorre in his first role after escaping from Hitler’s Europe played Raskolnikov — how could that whiny, sweaty, pop-eyed little toad have ever imagined himself to be an Ubermensch above the law? — while the police detective Porfiry Petrovich was played by Edward Arnold, who the following year would be cast, for one film only, as Nero Wolfe.
If you missed the TCM debut of this version of Crime and Punishment, watch for it when next it’s shown.
Speaking of Nero, it was my good fortune that I began reading Rex Stout in the late 1950s, when I was in my middle teens and also pigging out on a dozen or more TV Western series a week.
Why was this a lucky break for me? Because one of those Western series saved me from misunderstanding Archie Goodwin.
If you were following the Wolfe saga during the Hammett-Chandler era when the novels and novellas were first coming out, you might easily have tried to assimilate Archie to the legion of wisecracking PI/first person narrators of the time, and then rejected the character when you sensed what a poor fit that was.
Even so astute a critic as John Dickson Carr, writing in 1946, referred to Archie as “insufferable” and a “latter-day Buster Brown.”
But if you were fortunate enough to discover Stout in the late Fifties, at a time when millions of Americans including myself were watching Maverick every Sunday evening, you might have recognized Archie Goodwin and Bret Maverick as soul brothers.
You might have credited Rex Stout with having created in prose the Great American Wiseass prototype which James Garner brought to perfection on film. You might have longed to see one of Stout’s novels filmed with Orson Welles as Wolfe and Garner as Archie. At least I did. What a shame that it never happened!
When did TV movies begin? The first films that networks called by that name were broadcast in the fall of 1964. But if a TV movie is a feature-length film that tells a continuous story and was first seen in a single installment, the genre dates back at least to the suspense thrillers and Westerns that were aired one week out of four, beginning in the fall of 1956, as part of the prestigious CBS anthology series Playhouse 90 (1956-61).
As a young teen I watched some of those films. Until recently the only one I had revisited as an adult was So Soon to Die (January 17, 1957), starring Richard Basehart and Anne Bancroft and based on the novel of the same name by Jeremy York, one of the many bylines of the hyper-prolific John Creasey (1908-1973).
A few weeks ago I came upon another, one that I hadn’t seen in more than half a century. The Dungeon (April 10, 1958), written and directed by David Swift, starred Dennis Weaver as a man who, after being acquitted of murder, is kidnapped by a psychotic ex-judge and locked up in a cell in the attic of his isolated mansion, along with several other acquitted defendants.
A great noir premise and a great cast to boot — Paul Douglas, Julie Adams, Agnes Moorehead, Patty McCormack, Patrick McVey, Thomas Gomez, Werner Klemperer, the list goes on and on. And the tension is heightened by the magnificently ominous music of a never credited Bernard Herrmann.
I wish Swift had provided a backstory to explain what turned the judge into a sociopath, and my mind, not to say my nose, boggles when I start wondering how his prisoners (one of whom has been held for more than a year!) ever showered or kept clean-shaven or changed clothes. But if you have the good fortune to find this film on DVD as I did, it’s well worth seeing and, thanks to Herrmann, hearing.
The Poetry Corner has been on sabbatical lately but I need to bring it back in order to tout perhaps the finest detective novel to deal centrally with the subject.
The author was Nicholas Blake, known outside our genre as C. Day Lewis (1904-1972), poet laureate of England and the father of actor Daniel Day-Lewis. The detective, as always except in Blake’s non-series crime novels, is Nigel Strangeways.
The title is Head of a Traveler (1949). Thomas Leitch in his essay on Blake in Mystery and Suspense Writers, Volume 1 (Scribner, 1998), describes the novel as “one of his most tormentedly introverted. The central figure is the distinguished poet Robert Seaton, whose household is destroyed by the unexpected discovery of his vanished brother Oswald’s decapitated corpse. The events of the fatal night remain obscure even after Strangeways’ final explanation; the real interest of the novel is in its impassioned examination of the costs of poetry — the lengths to which poets and those who love them will go in pursuit of their craft.”
Anthony Boucher in his short-lived “Speaking of Crime†column in Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine (August 1949) was a bit less enthusiastic: “Blake knows so much about his theme, the nature of poetic creation, that he never quite conveys it convincingly to the reader.”
Whichever critic is right, when it comes to the intersection of crime fiction and poetry, Head of a Traveler remains the “locus classicus.â€
May 31st, 2009 at 10:23 pm
I was a bit young for the heyday of live television and the anthology series, but I do know that a surprising number of genre works were adapted for various shows varying from works by Hammett, Chandler, Carr, and even Ian Fleming.
Over the years I’ve managed to see a handful of these, and barring the occasional corpse that walks off the set some of the adaptations were quite good. There was a pretty good version of The Glass Key that I recall, and I know their was an adaptation of The Burning Court with George C. Scott and Dana Wynter and The Devil in Velvet with Whit Bissell.
I think Mike Nevins has Archie exactly right. I’ve always thought his ‘voice’ was closer to Huck Finn than Sam Spade, and the Welles/Garner pairing would have been nice. Of course Archie’s wiseassing grows more notable as the books progress, but the idea is there even in the first books.
As for Head of a Traveller it is one of those books that may be more interesting for the subject than the mystery, but no one can say Blake didn’t know what he was writing about.
June 1st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
From Mike to Mike: In one of the Wolfe books (I forget which one*wince*)Archie says that his father’s name was James Arner Goodwin. Since he’s on record that his name is Archie and not Archibald, I’ve always suspected that his birth certificate reads James Arner Goodwin, Junior, “Archie” having been bestowed on him as a kid to distinguish him from Dad. Hmm… I guess that “James Arner” business is just a coincidence… unless, of course, I’m wrong.
June 2nd, 2009 at 10:14 am
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if the book where Archie reveals his father’s name came after Maverick debuted? Could Stout have seen Archie in Garner’s character just as I did?
June 2nd, 2009 at 11:18 am
Alas for a nice theory, unless you believe in precognition. The facts about James Arner Goodwin came to light in Too Many Women (1947), chapter 27, page 133.
But as coincidences go, it’s a whopper.
— Steve
June 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Well, that was quick. Thanks, Steve. I’ve had the theory about James Arner Goodwin,Jr. for quite a while now, and I always felt that Francis Michael Nevins,Jr. might just look upon it favorably. -David Michael Doran (my father’s name was David Francis Doran)
June 2nd, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Agreed Garner would be a great Archie, but doesn’t Stout describe Archie somewhere as about 5’11” with brown to auburn hair? Not that such things rule anyone out, not with Daniel Craig such a good Bond. Still, I’m not sure I can see Garner’s basic character putting up with Wolfe as long as Archie has. But then Rockford does put up with Rocky and Angel, and they aren’t smart and don’t pay him either.
Anyway, to see an interesting variation on Archie there is an old episode of Burke’s Law where the chief of police is murdered at a detective convention. Present are Inspector Homes of the Yard (Carl Reiner), Achilles Parrot of the Surete (Ed Begley Sr.), Mr. Toto (J. Carroll Naish), and special guest private eye Caligula Bear (Thomas Gomez), so we get to see Gene Barry playing a reluctant Archie to Gomez as Wolfe. They even manage to get in E.W. Hornung’s famous line of doggerel, ‘Though he might be more humble/There’s no police like Holmes.’ Zsa Zsa is around as a Russian policewoman too. Gomez does a very good Wolfe, and unlike the others plays it straight.
Though he looked nothing like the part as I saw him, Tom Mason was good as Archie in the 1973 made-for-television movie Nero Wolfe with Thayer David as Wolfe, based on The Doorbell Rang.
June 3rd, 2009 at 12:44 pm
In which I make bold and correct David Vineyard: That “Burke’s Law” episode, “Who Killed Supersleuth?”, I was able to catch a while back. Carl Reiner’s fauxHolmes is named “Inspector House”; Ed Begley’s fauxPoirot is “Bascule Doirot”; Thomas Gomez’s fauxWolfe is “Caligula Foxe”; and Zsa Zsa Gabor is the Hungarian commissar “Ilona Buda” – so named so Gene Barry can say to her at one point, “Buda, you’re a pest.” All this sparkling wit from the pen of Lorenzo Semple Jr., just before he got hold of Batman.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Hadn’t seen the Burke’s Law for a long time so thanks for the corrections, and yes, there is some silliness, but the Wolfe thing is played straight with Barry finding himself playing Archie to Gomez Nero, and those scenes are well done, and over all it’s an entertaining episode. Burke’s Law almost never played straight anyway, even the Harlan Ellison penned episodes are done for laughs, but some of the mysteries aren’t bad, Barry had a degree of charm, and in this one at least we get to see a fine character actor play a variation of Wolfe and what Barry might have done as Archie. For that I can almost forgive Lorenzo Semple for Batman (almost).
And really, is Caligula Foxe any worse than Stout’s own Tecumseh Fox or Ken Crossen’s Jupiter Jones? Or for that matter Christie’s Achilles Poirot?
June 6th, 2009 at 12:48 am
Nothing is ever simple. Not even a screenwriter named Semple.
Following Mike Doran’s lead I looked up Lorenzo Semple Jr.’s screenwriting career, and what a rollercoaster.
First, aside from Batman, the other bad stuff includes Sheena (he got a Razzi nomination for that one), Flash Gordon, Hurricane (the one with Mia Farrow), and the biggie that even tops Batman for all time bad — Dino De Laurentis remake of King Kong.
But then there were some surprises. Like an Edgar win for the screenplay for Three Days of the Condor, and nominations for The Drowning Pool and The Parallax View. A New York Film Critics award for Pretty Poison, and screenplays for Papillion and Never Say Never Again. But then he also wrote Fathom, which is a toss up — I liked it, but may have been more influenced by Raquel Welch than anything else. What can I say, I was a hormonal teen at the time.
Still, what an impressive, and uneven, record. Some absolutely awful movies and some damn good ones — maybe even great ones.
As for the “Who Killed Supersleuth” episode of Burke’s Law, I found my copy and watched again, and rate it much higher than Mike did. Maybe it wasn’t the height of wit, but it succeeded as exactly what the show was meant to be, a sort of glamorous showcase for well known guest stars played off Gene Barry’s charm, and mysteries that were better than they had to be as often as not. Thomas Gomez version of Wolfe is worth watching the whole thing for in my opinion. And casting J. Carroll Naish as Mr. Toto was pretty clever considering he had earlier done The New Adventures of Charlie Chan for television. I even found an episode of The Rogues (“Death of a Fleming”) that I remembered fondly.
And The Green Hornet wasn’t terrible.
So maybe we shouldn’t forgive him for Batman — and certainly not Sheena and Hurricane (Flash Gordon has its moments), but the only two I can really hold against him are Batman and King Kong, and let’s be fair, neither of those had a chance at the time he did them to be anything but what they were. It’s not like they would have done Batman straight on network television then, and the script is the least of the problems with King Kong. Not that Semple wasn’t the most likely reason for the camp elements — and those in Never Say Never Again and Fathom too, but I’d have to say his career balances out.
Which is remarkable when you consider just how bad Batman, King Kong, Sheena, and Hurricane are.
June 9th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Just to clarify: my comments were not intended as a blast at Lorenzo Semple Jr. As with anyone in the screenwriting trade, Semple’s career displays a pretty wide arc, and his overall batting average is a pretty good one.
And I wasn’t really knocking Batman either: 1966 came exactly midway through my high school years, and I remember the seachange all too well. The culture went from sedate to frenetic seemingly overnight. I recall Batman principally as the show that killed Black-and-White; if you didn’t have color tv but knew someone who did, you somehow found an excuse to drop by on Wednesday or Thursday night. Bill Dozier said that the reason he chose Semple for the Batman assignment was that Semple was “the most bizarre thinker” that he knew – and also bear in mind that the comic books that they were most likely working from were from the period when Gardner Fox and Bill Finger were writing the stories and Dick Sprang was doing the artwork – Batman at its gaudiest and most bizarre. Anyway, the Batman credit became, for good or ill, Semple’s calling card for the rest of his career, and he seems to have survived, even thrived , on it.
As to Burke’s Law, an all-time favorite of mine, I would respectfully dissent just a bit from David’s evaluation of the Wolfe-Foxe characterization. “Foxe” seemed kind of rumpled, in a baggy white suit that looked left over from Thomas Gomez’s last appearance on Adventures In Paradise. Further, Gomez was way too jovial for Wolfe. I don’t doubt that with the right script, the right wardrobe, and the right Archie, Thomas Gomez would have made a most satisfactory Nero Wolfe, but this wasn’t it. (Any more than bulky Ed Begley was right as the small, dapper Poirot.)
While we’re still on Burke’s Law, when you get a chance, look up Who Killed Hamlet? You not only get to see John Cassevetes doing a beatnik riff on Hamlet’s soliloquy in front of a slow-burning Basil Rathbone, but take a good look during the teaser at the unbilled actor playing the victim – I won’t spoil it for you.
June 9th, 2009 at 10:57 pm
Mike
You have to understand that when I saw Gomez as Wolfe he was the first and only Wolfe I had seen and remained so for almost a decade when Thayer David played the role. Yes Gomez was rumpled, but then he was almost always rumpled in films. I can only think of a handful where he is even vaguely well groomed. And I still say that a glimpse of Gomez and Barry as Wolfe and Archie is worth watching the episode for.
Granted Begley is badly miscast, but at that he’s a more likely Poirot than Tony Randall (though I have a soft spot for the film Randall did). Still, physically Begley isn’t that far off. He is short and bald, just a bit stockier than I see Poirot (who was played at least once by the gigantic Charles Laughton). I think where the wires are crossing is on the idea of the Gomez as a faithful Wolfe, while I was just pleased to see any Wolfe and Archie at the time, and enjoyed it on that level.
In general I’m more willing to forgive eccentric casting of some roles if I see something I like about the performance. Ian Carmichael was nothing like my vision of Lord Peter, but now I can’t see anyone else in the role (Edward Petherbridge who was much closer to Sayers wasn’t half as good). Ronald Colman is the film version of Bulldog Drummond and you couldn’t get farther from the character in the book than Colman’s suave handsome charmer. Peter Lorre isn’t vaguely like John P. Marquand’s Mr. Moto (buck teeth, Prussian hair cut, and loud clothes). For that matter charming William Powell couldn’t be farther from Nordic ubermensch Philo Vance, but is the best of the screen Vances.
Gomez was a glimpse of Wolfe, and for a decade the only one I had other than book covers. He wasn’t how I envisioned Wolfe, but then neither was Thayer David or Maury Chaykin who were both excellent in the part. Physically Edward Arnold came closer, but like Gomez and William Conrad was much too jolly. I’m just saying that even getting a glimpse of Wolfe at the time was a pleasant surprise, and good for what it was. At least they didn’t have Gomez sneaking into a child’s room with an orchid like they did with Conrad.
For that matter I’ll go out on a limb and say I liked Darren McGavin’s Mike Hammer much better than Stacy Keach although he didn’t even carry the proper .45. Robert Bray was closer than either one and not half as good. After all, wasn’t Columbo written for Bing Crosby and once played by Thomas Mitchell?
June 10th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Somewhere in my collection of ancient TV on tape, there rests a cassette I got hold of years ago titled “The Fat Man”. I thought when I bought it that it was based on the old radio show, but a viewing showed me otherwise. The title character, played by Robert Middleton, is called ‘Lucius Crane’, and he lives in a big fancy mansion with a young handsome assistant, and they investigate crimes. The credits show that this show was written by Ivan Goff and Ben Roberts, best known for the screenplay of White Heat and for producing Mannix for most of its run – and for later producing the 1981 Nero Wolfe series with Bill Conrad. I spent much of today trying to track this down on IMDb, and came up empty; apparently this episode never aired. I still have the tape, though, and tonight I’m going to dig it out and watch it again. I should have more on this ‘incredible coincidence’ tomorrow.
June 10th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
Mike
No, there doesn’t seem to be a listing for it on IMDB, but if you do a Google search for: “The Fat Man: The Thirty-Two Friends of Gina Lardelli,” several references show up, including a VHS copy for sale.
Mike Grost has a long write-up about the film on his website. Check it out at http://mikegrost.com/lewis.htm#FatMan .
Steve
June 10th, 2009 at 8:39 pm
Steve,
Thank you for the link to my site!
It is really strange that The Fat Man is not on the IMDB – I’ve regularly tried to find it there and failed.
Will be very interested in hearing what people say.
Despite the name change to the detective, he seems (broadly speaking) a similar character to the feature film version, which was directly based on the radio show.
June 10th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
The question is, I think, whether this failed FAT MAN pilot owes as much to Nero Wolfe and Archie as it does THE FAT MAN radio series and the first movie that was based on it.
The key paragraph in Mike Grost’s commentary would therefore be:
“The relationship between the detective and his assistant, initially recalls that between Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin, in Rex Stout’s mystery novels. The two bicker, and the assistant enters into complex negotiations with the detective, to get him to take the case, just like Archie and Wolfe. However, this aspect of their relationship is not emphasized in the later parts of the film. Also, unlike Archie and Wolfe, who share a brownstone home, the assistant in The Fat Man has his own apartment, and does not live with the detective hero.”
June 11th, 2009 at 8:56 am
The Fat Man on radio was named Brad Runyon to further muddy the waters. It is possible that a television pilot had the rights to the radio show and tried to do something similar to Nero Wolfe without paying for it since the similarities are numerous — although the gourmet Runyon does his own cooking if I remember the film and radio series correctly.
The Fat Man was created by Dashiell Hammett, and there is a short story with a private eye named Brad Runyon by Hammett, but I don’t think any of the Hammett bios really deal with how much — if any — input he had on the series other than his famous line that his only connection was to open the mail and take out the check. I always had the idea it was a take the money and run deal.
J. Scott Smart was Runyon in the movie that also features a young Rock Hudson as the chief suspect in a few scenes. Clinton Sundberg, a familiar, usually comic, charcter actor plays the assistant, but he is in no way an Archie in the film. Good cast though with Julie London, Jayne Meadows, and Emmett Kelly.
However I found this at the Thrilling Detective site, and hope they don’t mind my reproducing it here:
“To put the finishing touch to The Fat Man, a TV pilot was made in 1966 titled The Fat Man: The Thirty-Two Friends of Gina Lardelli. Writers were Ivan Goff and Ben Roberts who were, I think, connected to both Mannix and Mission Impossible. Show was hour-long, black and white, with Robert Middleton in the lead. This Fat Man was a private detective named Lucius Crane, a harpsichord-playing gourmet with a thin fast talking young assistant. It seemed to combine the Fat Man radio show with elements of Nero Wolfe. Show was competently made and Middleton was able to be both tough and effete. No mention of Hammett.”
(Dick Lochte, from Rara-Avis)
For whatever reason this one seems to have eluded IMDB on all counts.
June 11th, 2009 at 10:30 am
As promised, I took another look at the Fat Man pilot last night, as well as the 1951 Fat Man feature. FWIW, my findings:
(1) The ’51 movie differed from the radio show in giving Runyon an assistant (the Sundberg character) that he didn’t have on radio. In that medium, Runyon acted solo, as did his prototype, Hammett’s Continentinal Op.
(2) For the TV pilot, writers Goff and Roberts aged this character downward into a “juve lead” which would presumably facilitate selling the show.
(3) Hammett gets no credit in either the movie or the TV show. The reason is obvious: the blacklist was still very much in force throughout the ’50s. You’ll recall that was the reason for the demise of the radio show.
(4) This is pure speculation on my part: I believe the Wolfe connection comes from Goff and Roberts: they wanted to do Wolfe but couldn’t get the rights from Rex Stout. Meanwhile, Screen Gems had the Fat Man rights and persuaded G&R to take it on: “Hey, why not? One fat detective is just like another, right, boys?” Since the radio show had long been forgotten (I’m pretty sure that there weren’t any OTR clubs in the ’50s) G&R possibly decided to take the two properties and synthesize them into “Lucius Crane” – keeping Runyon’s toughness and actvity, adding Wolfe’s cosmopolitanism, making their mash-up just different enough to avoid possible legal action. As I said, that’s pure spec – but I also believe that the last point was the likely reason that the series didn’t sell.
One final point: of all the available actors who could have played Nero Wolfe in an authorized production, I think Robert Middleton would have come closest to what Rex Stout had in mind – just a little less jovial.
Thanks to one and all for going along.
June 11th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
I ran across one last oddity vaguely related to the Fat Man pilot. Later on Mannix(1969), a character called ‘Gina Lardelli’ shows up played by Corrine Comacho in an episode called “The Pittance of Faith.” Not all that common a name so I assume there is a connection even if it is only through Ivan Goff.
July 16th, 2010 at 10:04 am
Mr. Nevins, you’ve done it now. I’m going to go home and reread my favorite Wolfe, “Murder by the Book,” and picture the young James Garner as Archie! I’ve had numerous actors in mind as AG: Robert Vaughn and Bruce Willis, while rejecting Lee Horsley and accepting Timothy Hutton. I wonder if my mother, who got me into the books when I was 12, would have agreed with this –?
September 17th, 2011 at 4:06 pm
After seeing how the Inspector Lewis series has developed I would like to suggest Laurence Fox (Detective Sergeant Hathaway) as Archie. Its not so much the character he plays was how he was able to develop the character (I am sure the writers also deserve a lot of credit) given the history of the Inspector Morse series.