Sat 25 Jul 2015
COLLECTING PULPS: A Memoir, Part 16, by Walker Martin: A Field Trip.
Posted by Steve under Artists , Collecting , Columns , Pulp Fiction[26] Comments
A Field Trip
by Walker Martin
Recently, Steve Lewis reviewed the issue of Argosy for June 9, 1934. My copy of this issue is now over 80 years old and still in great shape with the pages very supple and no browning or brittleness. Nice cover and full spine. It has a nice smell and no pulp shreds to clean up. I like the cover by Paul Stahr with the macabre scene of two skeletons showing that two poker players were struck dead while playing cards.
Which reminds me of a field trip I once made to buy a couple original pulp cover paintings by Paul Stahr. It was in the mid-1970’s, and I was consumed by the desire to track down as many pulp paintings as I could find. This was 40 years ago (hard to believe that so much time has passed!), and I was busy doing the usual things that men in their thirties were always doing, like marriage, raising a family, job career, buying a house, and thinking about my next car.
But my real interests, now that I think back on my life, was reading, collecting books, vintage paperbacks, pulps, and trying to find the cover paintings used on the paperbacks and pulps. The video revolution was still several years off, so I had not yet started to buy hundreds of video tapes of old movies and serials. Not to speak of the thousands of dvds that I now have cluttering up my house.
Sure, all that other stuff is important in a life, but does anything really match the enjoyment and thrill of collecting books and art? This is the main subject of my two series: Collecting Pulps and Adventures in Collecting. Collectors are always paying lip service to their jobs and families, but I have often found them to be addicted to that greatest vice of all: book collecting. Otherwise known as bibliomania.
And of course collecting pulps, paperbacks, and original art are all offshoots of book collecting. I remember many of my friends in college, the army, at work, were often involved in wasting time boozing, taking drugs, gambling, or that most dangerous sport of all, chasing women. I like to pretend that I was not addicted to these mundane vices. No sir, I was back then a Collector with a capital C and I still think there is no higher calling for a life’s work.
I still wake up each day thinking about what I’m going to read or what books or pulps I can add to my collection. Not to mention what old movies I want to watch. And of course the collecting of original art, which is one of the most unique things to collect. A book or pulp for instance may have many copies in existence, but a piece of art is unique, a one of a kind thing connected to the collecting of books.
I’ve always wondered why more book and pulp collectors are not interested in at least having a few examples of cover art to hang on their walls, in their libraries, between the bookcases or if the art is small enough, on the book shelves with the books. I can understand not being able to spend thousands of dollars on artwork, but I have many times picked up amazing art bargains for very little money. Even today, some artwork can be bought for a few hundred or less. I’ve had more than one friend that liked to buy new cars every couple years for many thousands of dollars but would turn pale in horror at the thought of spending a few hundred on a pulp cover painting.
Which brings me around to the details of my field trip. In the 1970’s and even in the 1980’s, it was possible to buy non SF cover paintings for very little money. Very few collectors were interested in such genres as detective, western and adventure paintings. As a result of this lack of interest I routinely bought pulp and paperbacks paintings for prices as low as $50 and for many years I was paying only an average price of $200 to $400 each for artwork. Now prices are higher but you still can find bargains, especially at the two pulp conventions: Windy City and Pulpfest.
In fact, it was at one of the early Pulpcons that a friend told me about an art store in Brooklyn NY that had pulp art for sale. I had no idea about how to navigate to and through Brooklyn but he agreed to meet me a the Penn Station train station and take me out to the store. It was the typical small store but it was crammed with paintings.
I still remember the very large painting by Walter Baumhofer that the dealer showed me. It was enormous and showed a shootout in a bar between gangsters. It was used as an interior in a slick magazine, perhaps The Saturday Evening Post or Colliers. But he wanted a few hundred for it and I couldn’t buy everything, so I reluctantly passed on it. One of my collecting mistakes from 40 years ago that still haunts me. I still dream about these mistakes and often wake up in the middle of the night cursing myself. My wife wonders what the hell, but most collectors probably know what I’m talking about.
The dealer showed me several other pieces, and I was shocked to see how he had the paintings stored. Most were unframed, and he was just pulling them out and scraping the paint off as he yanked them out. Finally he got to the paintings that I could afford at the $200 level. There were several Paul Stahr paintings, and I recognized them as Argosy covers. Stahr was very prolific and did many covers for the magazine in the 1920’s and 1930’s.
I decided I could spend $400, after quickly calculating how much I owed my wife, mortgage, car payment, and a couple pulp collectors who sold me sets of pulps on the installment plan. The paintings I bought were used for the covers on Argosy for December 3, 1932 and December 24, 1932. So we packed them up for the long trip back home and casting a final look of regret at the big Baumhofer masterpiece, I left the store. I never returned, and I’m sure it is long out of business.
I had the paintings nicely framed, and both were hanging together for around 20 years. I still have the December 3, 1932 painting but the December 24 artwork suffered a tragic end. Steve Kennedy, a NYC art dealer who just died a few weeks ago specialized in pulp art. He thought he could get me a good deal in a trade but I would have to give up the December 24, 1932 piece. So he took the painting and mailed it off on approval to another collector. Later on, he told me the sad news that the Fed Ex or UPS truck had caught on fire and the painting was destroyed.
All collectors have the time travel dream. You know the one where you go back in time and buy a stack of Hammett or Chandler first editions. Or maybe you buy several issues of the first Tarzan All-Story or the first Superman comic. One trip I would make would be back to the Brooklyn store of 40 years ago. Only this time I’d say to hell with the bills and mortgage payment and by god, I’d buy that beautiful Baumhofer gangster painting!
July 25th, 2015 at 4:07 pm
I so enjoy these trips through the collector’s mentality.
July 25th, 2015 at 4:28 pm
Walker,
Hate to ask, but did you recoup anything from the loss of the painting?
July 25th, 2015 at 5:00 pm
Walker, you are still too young to think about this, but I have recently began to seriously consider where all my junk…uh, I mean my collections will go after I die. With no family to leave it to it will be up to me to make sure my comic strip collections and TV series collections survive.
I know Ohio State has a great library of comic strip collections so I hope mine may make it there and there is the Paley Center or UCLA for my TV shows, but what are the places that honor and preserve pulp art and books?
July 25th, 2015 at 6:01 pm
Exactly Howard! That’s the main thrust of my pulp memoirs, to explore and discuss the fun and value of collecting books, pulps, and art. The art of collecting is a life changing force and one I’m so happy to have been involved in. Not only because of the books and art but the great people I’ve come in contact with, some of them I’ve been friends with for decades now. I’ve been friends with Steve and a follower of Mystery File for 40 years. Another guy I’ve known for over 40 years is Digges La Touche, who was just over this afternoon buying a couple hundred magazines from me.
July 25th, 2015 at 6:05 pm
Paul, Steve Kennedy took the entire loss because he said he was not allowed to insure the painting for what it was really worth. I’ve been collecting art for over 40 years now and I’ve never mailed a painting. I just don’t trust the shipping companies or the post office.
July 25th, 2015 at 6:08 pm
Michael, Bowling Green has a big pulp collection along with some pulp art and so does Syracuse who has the Street & Smith collections. UCLA has a big BLACK MASK collection. New Britain Museum took the Bob Lesser pulp paintings, so there are places that want the art and magazines.
July 26th, 2015 at 7:29 am
It might sound a bit high-falutin’, but collectors of pulps and original pulp art carry out the role of those collectors of high art who kept the works of the Great Masters safe. If you and other collectors hadn’t spent your time and money on those magazines and paintings there is a good chance that they would have been lost to future generations. You’re doing it for your own satisfaction, but you’re also saving the work of writers and artists from the relentless march of time.
July 26th, 2015 at 9:22 am
Bradstreet in Comment #7 brings up an interesting point. I once did an article titled “Are Pulp Collectors Crazy?”
I described in the piece how a friend of mine who was a collector of art and old fiction magazines, was blindsided by a sort of intervention after dinner one night. His wife and a therapist criticized his desire to collect and urged him to stop it. The therapist thought it showed signs of mental problems, etc.
My friend responded that not only was collecting fun but he felt he was saving paintings and magazines that otherwise might be discarded as trash and of no value.
Many collectors have told horror stories of artwork and collections simply thrown away because the non-collector sees the stuff as clutter or junk. These paintings deserve to be preserved as part of our popular culture history.
July 26th, 2015 at 9:39 am
Michigan State University Library’s Comic Art Collection also preserves comic books and strips:
http://comics.lib.msu.edu/
This collection is huge.
These are printed comics – NOT original art.
This is part of the Popular Culture collection at the MSU Library, in East Lansing, Michigan.
The Library also collects mystery fiction. They have some pulps, but it is much smaller than the Comic Art holdings.
July 26th, 2015 at 9:40 am
Here is an article about MSU’s collection:
http://statenews.com/article/2013/04/collection-of-dedication
July 26th, 2015 at 10:32 am
Comment #10–Thanks for this link to an interesting article about the comic collection. I see that it mentions Ray Walsh, the longtime owner of The Curious Bookshop. I’ve known Ray since the early 1970’s and he has been to most of the Pulpcons and Pulpfests. He always has several tables packed full of pulps, pulp paintings, and slicks. I hope to see him in a couple weeks at Pulpfest(pulpfest.com)
July 26th, 2015 at 10:45 am
9/10 Mike, thanks. I have a large collection of comic strip book collections. In fact I discovered more great newspaper comic strips in books than I ever did in my local newspaper.
I got most of my original art collection as a young man by simply writing the artist and asking for one. But once there became an eBay that method was less successful. I rarely collect originals anymore since I have no respectful place to display or store them.
July 26th, 2015 at 10:59 am
In Comment #12 Michael mentions that he rarely collects original art since he has no respectful place to display or store them.
This is a common problem among art collectors that’s for sure. I have a lot of wall space but my wife has her own ideas of how many paintings should be displayed per wall. As a result, I have paintings and illustrations that I can’t hang and they are stacked against bookcases or leaning against the wall, etc.
Just about all my art collecting friends have the same problem and we keep saying that we should stop buying art because of lack of wall space.
But of course when we see a great piece of art, we end up buying it. Recently, despite my promised to stop, I couldn’t help myself when I had the opportunity to buy an interior by Hannes Bok and a cover from GALAXY. They were just too beautiful to pass up…
July 26th, 2015 at 11:46 am
Another fine article Walker.
July 26th, 2015 at 12:02 pm
13. Walker, I know what you mean (you might have noticed the “rarely collect” phrase I used). One can be only so practical when one is a collector, there are times desire beats wisdom. And who says that is a bad thing? It may end up in my closet but hopefully someday it will find a better home.
July 26th, 2015 at 2:47 pm
Walker, I always enjoy your memoirs but there are times when I find your concept of money greatly different than mine. You mention how cover art could be bought for $50 back in the 70s. As if who couldn’t afford fifty bucks. But you could buy a new car for $2500 back then. Inflation has changed a lot over 40 years and we need to remember that what considering pulp and pulp art prices. In 1975 a new paperback cost about a dollar. Today it costs $8 to 10 dollars depending on it being a mass market paperback or the new larger size pb. So inflation has increased about ten-fold. The $50 painting in 1975 costs about $500 in today’s money. That is NOT pocket change. Back in 1975 an issue of Argosy cost perhaps $5. So that $50 painting equals ten issues of Argosy. I suspect most fans would rather have ten extra issues of Argosy than one painting. I suspect most pulp collectors are readers and not admirers of art. So there’s no mystery why more people did not collect pulp art, they felt their money was better spent in pulps.
July 26th, 2015 at 3:11 pm
I’m not quite sure if I agree with all of your math, Brian, but I have to admit that I fall into the latter category too. I enjoy looking at the cover paintings that Walker and other friends own, but I can’t afford to buy any now, and I couldn’t back in the 70s, either, when a $20 copy of a Black Mask magazine took a lot of precedence over a cover painting. In retrospect, the artwork may have been a better investment, mostly because cover art is always one of kind, but I wasn’t thinking of investment potential then, and it’s too late now.
July 26th, 2015 at 3:18 pm
Beb in Comment 16 points out the value of 1975 money compared to what it’s worth today. True inflation has occurred but my $50 in 1975 was not like $500 in today’s money. I just looked at the online Inflation Calculator and it says $50 in 1975 is now worth $220 in 2014 money.
I remember paying $50 for my first pulp painting, a 1939 cover from COMPLETE DETECTIVE. I was at a Lunacon SF convention in NYC in the early 1970’s and all I had in my wallet was the $50 and a train ticket home. Took all my cash but I still thought it was an amazing bargain for a piece of unique original art. Later on at the 1972 Pulpcon I got 2 Baumhofers for only around $100 each, again a big bargain as far as I was concerned.
I guess you are right though because I was just about the only one buying non SF pulp art, so everyone else must have thought that $50 or $100 was too much to pay.
But my point is not that I expect everyone else to fill their house with original art like me or Bob Weinberg or Bob Lesser. No, my point is that I don’t understand how a book or pulp collector can not want at least one piece of art to go with their collection. And I’m not talking about expensive pieces either. Why not one or two paintings from a pulp cover or a book dust jacket?
I simply don’t get it but you must have a point since most book collectors think the same way.
July 26th, 2015 at 4:42 pm
Regarding Brian’s point, I will concede that collecting art can be cost prohibitive depending on where your interests lay. However, I don’t quite understand a lack of interest in owning any art, regardless of its price.
Yes, if you want a pretty girl on a SF cover or a Doc Savage painting, sure, that will cost a few nickels. But there’s plenty to be had that’s cheap. My first piece was a Frank Kramer interior for $40. And now I think Walker & I are the only ones who buy Western pulp cover paintings. I personally think it’s the best cover genre: they’re typically colorful, action-filled, and include a girl in distress. (Have any for sale? Let me know!)
I think it’s just the next step in enjoying pulps after buying the actual magazines. Heck, even Digges recently took the plunge into art!
July 26th, 2015 at 5:30 pm
Walker,
Is it true that Digges bought a piece of original art? I never thought I’d see the day! I’d guess it’s a portrait of E.S.G now hanging over his headboard!
As far as the argument to own or not to own original pulp and paperback art, you will never convince collectors like Brian or Steve,etc. to buy original art. They are book and magazine collectors only, who just don’t see the reason for spending the money on originals.
Damn good thing too. Can you imagine going to the pulp cons and competing with every attendee in the room? In my case, I knew early on that I wanted to own at least one pulp painting in my collection. And visiting your house in the early 80’s with Steve Lewis, seeing every wall in every room (bathroom included) filled with originals only confirmed my wish. I do agree with you that every collector should own at least one original, but it may not be an argument worth having. More for the people that really care about it!
July 26th, 2015 at 6:27 pm
As someone who has collected comic strip collection books and comic strip art I have to say the two appeal to different collectors in me.
The books I collect to read and discover new treasures I would have missed otherwise.
The art appeals to the visual fan who loves the art and seeks a connection to the strip/book that I enjoy. I own a special piece that work no one else will ever own.
No wise collector buys for profit you buy because it appeals to you, be it a book to read or art to view.
July 26th, 2015 at 7:06 pm
Matt in Comment 19 is right about the excellent western art available. Not only was it inexpensive back in the 1970’s but it still is not that costly. Most collectors have this prejudice against the western genre, in fact I once had a collector go through my house looking at the paintings and complain to me that I had too many westerns.
Collecting pulps means you have to be aware of the great artwork because of the amazing covers that reach out and grab you. The next step is collecting the original art and you don’t have to break the bank either.
July 26th, 2015 at 7:13 pm
I know Matt and Paul might not believe it but yes Digges did buy some art, an Edd Cartier interior. In fact he knows I have over a dozen other Cartier’s and he wants at least one more.
The reason we are so astounded by Digges La Touche wanting art is because for decades he has been known as The Reading Machine. He lives to read and that is his main purpose in life. A noble goal as far as I’m concerned. So to see him interested in original art means he must have fallen victim to my baleful influence.
For 40 years I’ve been telling him that he should get at least one piece of art to go with all his thousands of books and pulps.
July 26th, 2015 at 7:25 pm
Michael in Comment 21 mentions the connection between book and the art. I agree completely. For many decades I looked for a BLACK MASK painting from the classic Joe Shaw period of the 1930’s. I had a set of the magazine and thus I felt I had to have a painting also.
I did manage to find three BLACK MASK cover paintings from the 1940’s but not from the classic, hardboiled period. That is until recently when a dealer listed a painting and didn’t realize it was a BLACK MASK cover. I practically broke my fingers ordering the art which was priced far below what such a painting is worth.
If you collect a favorite magazine title, let’s say BLACK MASK or STARTLING or GALAXY, what could be cooler that also having a piece of original art to go with the great collection?
July 29th, 2015 at 7:38 pm
I will be waiting most patiently at my table at PulpFest for Brian or anyone else to send over any collectors with original pulp paintings to trade me for 10 issues of Argosy…but please make sure they see me before they talk to Walker Martin or Paul Herman because while I can personally testify to both those gentlemen being completely insane nobody ever accused them of being stupid. 🙂
July 30th, 2015 at 12:13 am
Scott and I will have dealer’s tables next to each other, so it looks like a pulp art bidding war for sure. Pulpfest is now only two weeks away, August 13-16.
A must attend event!