Thu 3 Mar 2022
by Francis M. Nevins
What I’m about to describe sounds like a coincidence worthy of Harry Stephen Keeler, but it really happened. During the year 1928 two young men of New York, working in the advertising and publicity fields, spent most of their evenings, weekends and vacation time collaborating on a detective novel for submission to a writing contest with a $7,500 prize.
Their names were Frederic Dannay and Manfred B. Lee, and the byline they used for their novel was Ellery Queen. They won the contest (only to lose it again, but that’s another story) and eventually became world-famous under that byline.
Many of their subsequent novels and stories centered around a cryptic message left by the murder victim.
Now comes the hard-to-believe part. During that same year 1928 a book was published which consisted of three long stories plus a framing story. The first of the long stories, “The Giant Moth,†was also about two young men in the advertising business who had written a detective novel for a prize competition.
On the eve of the announcement of the winner, one of the two—a fellow named Wilk Casperson who’s desperate to win and use his share of the money to set up housekeeping with the daughter of a wealthy stockbroker—goes to a masquerade ball at the mansion of his girlfriend’s father dressed as, you guessed it, a giant moth, and quickly becomes involved in a murder whose victim apparently left behind him, you guessed it again, a dying message.
Who wrote this story? The King of Koinkydink. The nuttiest filbert of them all. In his middle twenties, after a few years of turning out fairly ordinary short stories, usually with O. Henry twist endings, Harry Stephen Keeler (1890-1967) became more ambitious and, beginning in 1914, concentrated on much longer tales. Usually works of such length are called short novels, novelettes, novelets or novellas. Harry liked to call them novellos, probably with the accent on the first syllable.
“The Giant Moth†first appeared in Top-Notch, 1 June 1918, at about 35,000 words. Ten years later and at least 20,000 words longer, it became the tale of the first prisoner in Keeler’s SING SING NIGHTS (Dutton, 1928).
Fast forward almost a century and it still stands up as a beautiful example of the kind of plot only Keeler could devise. With two characters dressed as moths attending the same masquerade ball at different times, two supplies of disappearing ink, a Chinese gangster who like-a to speak-a in de Italian dialecto, a missing diamond necklace, a murdered lepidopterist, an enigmatic Japanese servant, and a secret map giving away the defenses of the Panama Canal, the story has enough wackadoodle elements for three times its length, but let’s focus on the dying message.
Paralyzed from the waist down after being shot in the back, and with no pen or pencil within reach, the mothologist in his last moments apparently made use of what he did have available—some strips of tissue paper and rubber type used to make out classification cards for his specimens—to leave the following message:
FIND
USHI
HE
KNOWS
Ushi is the name of the moth maven’s servant, who has vanished. No reader in a million years could figure out the real meaning of that message and no writer other than Keeler could have dreamed up the gimmick. Whether Fred Dannay or Manny Lee ever heard of the tale remains unknown.
The Ellery Queen novels and stories proved to be so popular in the 1930s that at the end of the decade a network radio series about the character was launched, with Hugh Marlowe (1911-1982) as EQ. The prime mover behind the series was George Zachary (1911-1964), who served as producer and director from its debut on CBS as an hour-long program (18 June 1939) till its departure in 30-minute form on 22 September 1940.
In January 1942, a month after Pearl Harbor, the series returned on the NBC Red Network, with Carleton Young (1907-1971) as Ellery. Zachary continued as producer but was replaced in his other capacity by two men from the Ruthrauff & Ryan advertising agency’s stable of directors working in alternation, Bruce Kamman and the man we are to follow.
Knowles Entrikin (1880-1956) is almost completely forgotten today, but in his time he was fairly well-known on the stage as a producer, playwright and director before he entered radio. Perhaps his main claim to fame in that medium was that in 1934, as director of the CBS educational series American School of the Air (1930-48), he hired a brash 19-year-old named Orson Welles for his first audio acting job.
I know of only one reference to Entrikin’s work on the EQ series, an unpublished letter of 22 November 1942 from Manny to Fred, discussing the program’s most recent episode (“The Bald-Headed Ghost,†19/21 November):
I take it that the last words mean: Who will know you and I aren’t to blame?
Entrikin seems to have remained with the EQ series from its return to the air in January 1942 until fourteen months later when Ruthrauff & Ryan assigned him to a project on the West Coast. He’s included here because, like Harry Stephen Keeler, he brushed against Fred Dannay and Manny Lee.
Finally we come to another man, infinitely better known than Entrikin, who was thought to have brushed against Fred and Manny but actually didn’t. I refer to none other than John Wayne. During the WWII years the Queen radio series featured Hollywood personalities and some unknowns, many of them in the military, as guest armchair detectives.
My book THE SOUND OF DETECTION: ELLERY QUEEN’S ADVENTURES IN RADIO (2002) included an episode-by-episode list of those guests, based on research in old studio files by Martin Grams, Jr. Much of what Marty found in those files consisted only of guests’ first initials and last names. For “The Fire Bug†(22/24 July 1943) and “The Fallen Gladiator†(16/18 September 1943) one of those guests was a certain J. Wayne.
Knowing that the Duke didn’t serve in the war, both Marty and I—and before us John Dunning in the entry on the Queen series in ON THE AIR: THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF OLD TIME RADIO (Oxford University Press, 1998)— assumed that this was he. Later research revealed that “J.†was an ordinary Joe by the name of Jerry Wayne.
All things considered, I still think the mistake we made was reasonable. But I do wonder how many readers of THE SOUND OF DETECTION racked their brains trying to imagine the Duke playing supersleuth. If any of them happen to read this column, my deepest apologies.
March 3rd, 2022 at 8:49 pm
Swell dissertation. “Murdered lepidopterist”. Haw! Wonder how many lepidopterists have ever been slain.
But, I note with pleasure the name of Carleton Young; he of the raspy-voiced, “The Whisperer”.
I’m woefully under-familiar with EQ; this review was educational for me. I did not even know the author was a writing team.
I do remember the EQ radio series where Hollywood stars appeared as guest sleuths. Fun.
I find it interesting too that EQ specialized in “dying men’s messages”. How many of us might have our wits about us –enough to concoct puzzles –when expiring? I’m always fascinated by the differences between fiction and realism.
In fiction, characters burn their mouths on “scalding cups of black liquid…”
How much liberty is too much liberty? Just asking.
March 3rd, 2022 at 9:00 pm
I can swallow “dying messages” in mystery stories only when there’s a reason why the dying man left the message he did. He has to have cogent reason for what he was trying to say, but possibly: he was interrupted, or reverted to his native language, and the like. My fiction has to be real life, if you see what I mean.
March 3rd, 2022 at 10:59 pm
So: ‘following a compelling impulse’ when one is dying (revenge, hate, outrage, etc) is a more plausible reason for dipping one’s finger in one’s own blood to write the name one’s murderer. Okay yea. I go along with that.
As long as it’s natural and not, “I’ll write my killer’s name in Arabic verse because only an Arab detective is smart enough to lay his hand on this murderer!”
March 4th, 2022 at 12:20 am
To clarify. The only reason I can think of for a dying message is to name the killer. Anything other than that is bushwa. It’s the indecipherable ones which cause the problem.
March 4th, 2022 at 1:07 am
I thought Carlton Young was notable as The Count of Monte Cristo. Parley Baer as his friend and confidant Rene Michon. Grand show.
March 4th, 2022 at 11:05 am
“Mistah Dantes! Mistah Dantes! There’s trouble down ‘t ‘th Long Branch!”
🙂
March 4th, 2022 at 2:54 pm
That’s what they call a mashup for sure!
March 4th, 2022 at 8:22 pm
A great place to start reading Ellery Queen is his story collection “Calendar of Crime”
March 4th, 2022 at 8:33 pm
Taking note of that tip ^ as I would E.F. Hutton.
Reflecting during my lunch break today how really prodigious it is, these mystery authors concocting puzzles that stump so many audiences, at the same time writing them so engagingly. Either one of these feats is tremendous on its own.
Discovered from the OP’s review just how long EQ has been around. I had no idea. I thought he came about in the ’50s or ’60s, with actor Jim Hutton and David Wayne playing his father.
All the more imposing when a mystery franchise like this spans so many generations of readers. Gadzooks.
March 4th, 2022 at 9:40 pm
p.s. Henry Darger, another unsung Chicagoan and author similar to –and contemporaneous with –Harry Stephen Keeler
It would have been really something if these two guys had ever met
March 4th, 2022 at 11:40 pm
Probably Sherlock Holmes and Conan Doyle have the greatest coincidence cross cultural alignment in the genre when you consider Billy the Page in the original production of William Gillette’s SHERLOCK HOLMES was played by Charlie Chaplin at age 12.
These are always interesting, how near and how far these things can be. Jacques Futrelle on the Titanic, S. S. Van Dine on the Lusitania, Leslie Charteris on the Hindenberg (all used by Max Allan Collins).
P. G. Wodehouse and Sax Rohmer were not only friends they were clerks in the same bank in Alexandria Egypt (must have been one boring job). Conan Doyle creator of fictions greatest detective the brother in law of E. W. Hornung creator of Raffles its greatest thief.
They don’t all pay off as Jerry Wayne proves. The A MacLean who wrote Sexton Blake adventures wasn’t Alistair as was so often ventured at one time.
March 5th, 2022 at 9:10 pm
“Billy” (the pageboy) first played by Chaplin! Huh. I did’n know dis. Amazing.
I very much admire Mercury Theater’s adaptation of ‘The Strange Case of Miss Alice Faulkner’ (title was shortened for the airwaves). Anyway, the character of “Billy” is a warm, human element in that romp, and he carries a significant plot point. I always mentally picture young Roddy McDowall as Billy. Now I will think about Chaplin instead.
For a few minutes at the beginning of the radio version, Welles talks about Gillette and the origin of the play. The recordings I’ve heard are scratchy and crackling but that sometimes adds a little to the otherworldliness of the whole thing.
Ah well. Ty sir for all those fun factoids.
March 5th, 2022 at 10:42 pm
Lazy,
The Playbill lists Billy the Page played by Master Charles Chaplin (age 12).
March 6th, 2022 at 8:13 am
I believe it! Was just ruminating on the radio version for a moment.
‘Alice Faulkner’ is a wonderful Holmes adventure albeit not having been written by Conan Doyle.
I’ve only viewed it as a stage production once, with Frank Langella as Holmes in an HBO filmed play.