Tue 6 Sep 2022
Diary Review: DIME MYSTERY MAGAZINE May 1945.
Posted by Steve under Diary Reviews , Magazines , Pulp Fiction[16] Comments
DIME MYSTERY MAGAZINE. May 1945. Cover by Gloria Stoll. Overall rating: *
BRUNO FISCHER “Deadlier Than the Male.” Novelette. A soldier’s buddy comes home from the war to check on his friend’s wife, who seems to have changed. Murder welcomes him at the door. Fairly obvious ending. (2)
TALMAGE POWELL “The Dark, Unfriendly Tide.” A man tries to dispose of a girl’s body in the bayou, but the elements betray him. Overly melodramatic. (3)
WILLIAM R. COX “They’ll Kill Me!” Novelette. Tom Kincaid has a murderous competition in his attempt to make a movie about gambling. Low grade Hollywood all the way. (0)
CYRIL PLUNKETT “Murder on the Wing.” A man obsessed with owls suspects his wife of poisoning him. (1)
FRANCIS K. ALLAN “The Man with the X-Ray Eyes.” Novel. Duke Danube saves a girl from involvement with murder in an opium den. Could have been put down at any time. (0)
JOHN PARKHILL [pseudonym of William R. Cox] “Slips That Pass in the Night.” An ex-Marine helps an explorer’s daughter regain two stolen rubies. (1)
JOE KENT [pseudonym of Francis K. Allan] “The Madman in the Moon.” Novelette. A soldier on furlough returns to his old neighborhood and is nearly framed for murder. A certain flavor of the wartime forties enhances this less-than-average story. (3)
DAY KEENE “A Corpse for Cinderella.” Novelette. Dancing skeletons, the kiss of death, and other “supernatural” happenings are exposed by a private detective. Had promise, but much too overdone. (1)
September 7th, 2022 at 11:24 am
So, when did you do the reading/grading? I take it this was not DIME DETECTIVE at its height. The Keene story has no grade…
Is there any Talmage Powell story that’s Not Excessively melodramatic?
September 7th, 2022 at 11:38 am
The date as stated in the tagline at the end of the review was January 1968. That’s long enough ago that I’ve well forgotten any of these stories.
The rating for the Keene story, which I forgot to include when I posted this last night, was (1). I’ve added it now.
Also note that this was an issue of DIME MYSTERY, not DIME DETECTIVE. I’ve always considered DM to be second-rate in comparison to DD. I’ve always assumed that the emphasis in DM was on thriller material, not detective work. It seems to have been the case here.
The fact that two of the stories were bylined under pen names of authors otherwise included in this issue I did not know until last night. Back in 1968 I had no idea.
Overall, even though the story values in this issue didn’t thrill me all that much, the name recognition of the authors is rather high.
September 7th, 2022 at 2:38 pm
DIME MYSTERY started out as DIME MYSTERY BOOK in 1932 and was a regular mystery/detective pulp, but by 1933 the name changed to DIME MYSTERY and it became a Weird Menace pulp. It was the top title in Popular Publications Weird Menace trio (the other being TERROR TALES and HORROR STORIES), but by the early Forties gradually evolved back into more of a standard detective pulp. I tend to like Keene, Fischer, Cox, and Powell, but certainly, they could be inconsistent.
September 7th, 2022 at 7:19 pm
I cringed yesterday when I saw how low I rated the stories in this issue. I was being brutally honest, that seems clear. (I never dreamed that here, some 55 years later, anyone other than I would be reading what I thought at the time.)
But is it just barely possible that the vast majority of stories in the pulp magazines just weren’t very good?
September 7th, 2022 at 8:10 pm
Other than Fischer and Keene these aren’t really writers I associate with DM, but then the writer I most often think of is Zagat under various names.
This sounds as if the magazine was coming full circle around to more crime stories than the weird pulp vibe of the past. Only the Keene story sounds like classic DIME MYSTERY.
September 7th, 2022 at 11:22 pm
Steve in Comment #4 states is it just possible that the vast majority of stories in the pulps just were not very good? Several critics, often in slick magazines, have stated that the pulps were sub-literary or not worth reading. So the question that Steve asks is not a new theory at all.
But I’ve read many pulps over the last 50 plus years and I can say yes, most of the stories in the pulps are not very good but there is such a thing as a good, quality pulp title.
I have never wanted to read the mediocre or poor pulp stories. I’m always on the look out for the good or very good fiction and at this point I can say there definitely were some quality pulp titles like Black Mask, Dime Detective, and Detective Fiction Weekly in the detective genre. They published some poor fiction but also a lot of good fiction.
The same thing in the general fiction or adventure pulps. The quality magazines were Adventure, Short Stories, The Popular Magazine, Blue Book, and Argosy. All Story published a lot of SF that is dated by today’s standards but quite influential. True, they also published poor fiction but they had a lot of good stories.
The same can be said for the other genres except I never found much to like in the love or sport pulps. They followed a formula that defeated me just about every time. The western genre had a big formula also but still managed to have some titles that were good like Western Story, Dime Western, Star Western, West, Frontier, etc.
A lot of SF is dated but Astounding in the so called golden age had a big influence. Also Startling and Thrilling Wonder after Samuel Merwin took over in 1946.
This is turning into a essay, so I’ll stop since I discussed this subject a few years ago under the title “My Favorite Magazines” for Mystery*File.
September 7th, 2022 at 11:36 pm
I hope to reply later, when I have more time than I have tonight, but here’s the link to the longer essay Walker is referring to:
https://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=15813
September 8th, 2022 at 6:28 am
Good news. I have found a copy of this issue online:
https://ia802807.us.archive.org/3/items/DimeMysteryV31N04194505/Dime%20Mystery%20v31%20n04%20%5B1945-05%5D.pdf
It will take a while, but I plan to read each of the stories and compare my thoughts now with those I had then. Stay tuned!
And of course you are welcome to do the same.
September 8th, 2022 at 2:35 pm
Well…I was Very sleepy yesterday afternoon, as I think shows…indeed, DIME MYSTERY was a bit, shall we say, unwilling to completely give up its shudder past…sometimes only in quality.
One I read while awake, some time back:
https://socialistjazz.blogspot.com/2020/10/short-story-wednesday-dime-mystery.html
September 8th, 2022 at 4:02 pm
Todd liked his issue of Dime Mystery but Steve hated his issue. If I had read Steve’s review back in 1968, I would have said no way would Steve Lewis be a pulp collector. I would have been wrong!
September 8th, 2022 at 4:37 pm
Pulp magazines were still very new to me back in 1968. I didn’t start collecting them in earnest for a couple of years yet, after I’d moved from Michigan to here in CT. As for the numerical grades, in terms of comparison, most of the other magazines I was reading a the time were SF (Analog, If, Galaxy and the like) or mystery (EQMM, AHMM, and to some extent, Mike Shayne, when I could find copies). If this issue of Dime Mystery fell short, that probably had a lot to do with it.
September 8th, 2022 at 5:15 pm
I remember reading 40 years ago that everything worth reprinting from the pulps had already been reprinted. I didn’t believe it then, and I don’t believe it now. I know there are still a lot of excellent stories in the Western pulps that have never been reprinted. But I do have to agree that there were plenty of pretty bad stories printed in the pulps, too.
September 10th, 2022 at 7:07 am
Well, Sturgeon’s Educated Estimate: 90% of all work is mediocre or worse…applies to even the then-current magazines, as well as the pulps. And certainly, some pulps were better than others, an DIME MYSTERY was rarely one of the best of the pulps, even among Popular’s group.
September 10th, 2022 at 9:42 pm
[…] January 1968. I […]
September 21st, 2022 at 12:41 am
[…] then in January 1968. I […]
September 24th, 2022 at 4:25 pm
[…] then in January 1968. I […]