Wed 6 May 2015
COLLECTING PULPS: A Memoir, Part 14, by WALKER MARTIN: Weird Tales.
Posted by Steve under Collecting , Columns , Covers , Magazines , Pulp Fiction[22] Comments
by Walker Martin
Three years ago I discussed the Frank Robinson Collection auction which was organized by Adventure House. The biggest lot at that auction was the complete Weird Tales collection which sold for a quarter of a million dollars. Yes, that’s right, as in $250,000.00. Then we fast forward 3 years and again Adventure House held an auction for a complete collection of Weird Tales, only this time the set got zero bids. I believe a discussion of this auction will show not only what occurred and why one set sold and another set did not sell, but also we will learn how pulp collectors have changed over the years.
As with the Frank Robinson auction, this recent auction which was held on May 1, 2015, also did not generate much comment on the various discussion groups that I visit online. I know as a long time fiction magazine collector, I certainly want to talk about such subjects, in fact I’m starved for conversation and I guess that’s one of the reasons that I continue to post my pulp collecting memoirs. People have been collecting pulps for over a hundred years now, ever since the first one was published in 1896. I’ve been at it for over 50 years and I feel it’s important enough for us to continue posting articles and commenting about what happened during the time these fiction magazines ruled the newsstands.
I also feel it’s very important that we continue to support the two major pulp conventions, Windy City and Pulpfest. I’ve attended both over the years and have had many interesting conversations about the pulp era. At Windy City in April I had the opportunity to view the Weird Tales set which was on display behind the Adventure House tables. I also eagerly bought the $10.00 Weird Tales collection auction catalog. Published by Adventure House this is a 40 page full color description of the 274 issues. True, only 239 covers are shown but all are listed by condition in the back of the catalog. In addition to the 274 issues published during 1923-1954, the catalog also lists the 79 issues of the revived Weird Tales that were published during Summer 1973 to Spring 2014.
So this was a major auction of perhaps the most talked about, most famous pulp title of them all. It was advertised on the Adventure House website, emails were sent out announcing the auction, and a full color catalog was available for only 10 dollars. Why was it a flop? Why no bids?
Well, of course the most obvious reason is the fact that the minimum bid was set at $60,000. But if the Robinson WT set of three years ago sold for 250,000 dollars, how come this recent set could not attract $60,000? Well you know the old saying in real estate: location, location, location. In the pulp and book world, it’s: condition, condition, condition.
The Robinson collection was almost perfect. White pages, newsstand fresh covers, complete spines. Weird Tales was called “The Unique Magazine”. Well, the Robinson set was truly “unique”, definitely the best condition set of Weird Tales in existence. It could and did command a premium price.
So what was wrong with the set offered up for auction in May 2015? What prevented it from even getting one bid at the $60,000 minimum? The catalog described several good points such as blood red spines(they usually are faded), high quality paper, and custom made tray cases to hold each volume. When I viewed the set myself at the convention, I was impressed by all of the above. Unfortunately the following faults have to be mentioned:
1. The first 45 issues, March 1923 through June 1927 are bound in 10 blue volumes. Personally, I think using blue was a mistake. I have a set bound in red and it looks more impressive. But this is just a personal preference. The main problem with bound pulps is simply that many collectors won’t touch them at all. And those that will accept bound copies want a significant decrease in the usual price.
In the first paragraph I mentioned how pulp collectors had changed over the years, and this is one example. It used to be that old time collectors, guys who actually bought the magazines off the newsstands, loved to have their pulps bound. It gave them a look of respectability and the garish magazines looked more like a sedate book that they could proudly display on their bookshelves without being sneered at by other collectors and even non-collectors. Pulp collectors nowadays don’t think like this at all. They want the individual issues and they don’t like them bound.
2. Because they are bound these first 45 issues, which are very rare and expensive, only rate a good or good minus as far as condition.
3. Most issues in the early 1930’s have Scotch tape or clear tape on the head and foot of the spines. This was another practice that many of the old time collectors followed. I’ve seen pulps ruined with masking tape, discolored scotch tape, and even electrical tape. One guy even used stamps to close tears in the cover. Pulp collectors back then evidently thought nothing of closing and repairing tears with all sorts of tape. Now of course collectors frown on the use of tape.
4. The tray cases are a very good idea and look nice. Unfortunately several of the cases show water damage.
In my opinion, the above points prevented a high minimum bid and certainly explain why no one started off bidding at the $60,000 level. It’s too high a figure for a set in this condition. Perhaps a lower figure would have encouraged some beginning action and the final bidding might even have reached a high level. Perhaps a minimum bid of $20,000 would have been better but then again, you run the chance of the set going for such a figure and I guess the seller would consider that unacceptable.
I used to have a set of Weird Tales for many years but that was back in the days when you could buy issues for $5.00 each. Back in 1968, when I was discharged from the army, I had two big goals in my life: to get a complete set of Black Mask and a set of Weird Tales . I managed to do both within a few years. Since then I’ve seen many extensive runs of WT and I’m not even sure that it’s that rare. It seems that everybody, like many SF collectors, saved their copies! It’s really a pretty magazine, a thing of beauty.
My present set is not complete because I no longer care about the early issues of 1923-1925, most of which I find not that readable. My present set is a bound set from 1926-1954. I’ll tell the story about this set and it will illustrate the differences between the old time pulp collectors and the newer pulp collectors who never really bought any of the magazines off the newsstands.
In the 1980’s, Harry Noble, who had been buying pulps since the early 1930’s, decided to put together some bound sets of his favorite SF and fantasy magazines. He did this with such titles as Astounding, Famous Fantastic Mysteries, Fantastic Novels, Unknown Worlds, and of course, Weird Tales . He had trouble finding an inexpensive binder but finally found someone who would bind several magazines into one volume for a low price. Harry didn’t really care about the early issues, not only because they were not that readable, but also because they were too expensive for him to buy. But 1926-1954 he could handle and he started to his project one volume at time.
But some of his issues were coverless and he borrowed copies from my set of individual issues and made color Xerox copies of the covers. There were at least a dozen, maybe more issues that were bound with Xerox covers. As a second generation pulp collector, I tried to talk Harry out of binding the pulps. Some of the issues were in really nice shape and it was a shame to see them bound with trimmed edges. But Harry was from the first generation of collectors and he liked the look of the bound volumes.
Harry worked on this project for almost 20 years, up until his death at age 88 in 2006. He had prior warning that his illness was terminal and at the 2006 Pulpcon he told me and several other friends that he was dying. He welcomed us to visit his house and buy his extensive collection of pulps, books, and vintage paperbacks. Which we did. I made four such trips buying his sets of Western Story, Astounding, Short Stories and other items.
One day, at dinner at my house, a group of us were having dinner and the subject of the Weird Tales set came up. Harry said he wanted $10,000 for the bound in red years of 1926-1954. I pointed out that not only were the most expensive issues missing, but the set was bound which was a problem as far as value was concerned. Also I knew from personal experience that at least a dozen issues had Xerox color covers. I also remembered that there were a few other issues with pieces missing out of the covers.
However, I said I was willing to pay $5,000 considering the flaws, etc. Another well known, veteran collector also said he thought it might be worth $5,000 but no more. To tell you the truth, I wasn’t even sure it was worth the 5 grand. Harry, who loved bound sets, was justifiably upset of course. In fact, he said he would throw them in the dumpster before selling them for $5,000. One of our friends got a laugh by saying to tell him which dumpster because he would be there.
I figured that was that but a couple weeks later, I got a call from Harry. He had tried several other collectors and bookstores and no one would pay the $10,000. I’m pretty sure they would not even have paid the $5,000. Harry said if I still wanted them I could have the set for $5,000 and I accepted. He didn’t last much longer and died in December of 2006. So ended a 40 year friendship.
But I still have Harry’s bound set and it looks beautiful bound in red in the master bedroom. But I’d still rather have them unbound!
Editorial Note: This video produced by Adventure House of the Weird Tales collection they were offering may not stay online for long, but at least for now, it is still up:
May 6th, 2015 at 10:33 pm
Another great essay. Always glad to read these reflections, Walker.
May 6th, 2015 at 11:02 pm
Thanks Bill. I love to talk about collecting the old magazines. I’m getting older, the magazines are old, but the subject never gets old!
May 7th, 2015 at 10:20 am
Walker, it’s great to get your perspective as a long-time pulp reader and collector. It’s always insightful.
Back in the mid-’70s, I remember being intrigued by the idea of having a few runs of my favorite comic books bound. But then I realized that I would be losing portions of the cover because of the binding of the spines, as well as whatever was trimmed from around the edges to make them even.
I’m mildly interested when I see old bound volumes of pulps, thinking they would make great reading copies. But for the most part, I’d prefer the pulps as individual magazines that you can hold and admire from all sides, as well as read. (Please, please, please, let’s never start “slabbing” pulps like they do comics these days.)
The $60,000 starting bid is way out of a large percentage of pulp fans’ budgets. Even $20,000. … I can see trying to persuade my wife: Let’s hold off buying a new car, I’d like to buy a complete run of WEIRD TALES instead. Yeah, right. 😉
May 7th, 2015 at 10:33 am
Bill points out one of the basic Laws of Collecting, mainly that the non-collector will never understand the collector. The simple fact is that a complete run of WEIRD TALES is far more necessary than a new car.
In 10 years the new car will be ready for the scrap heap but in 10 years the WEIRD TALES set will probably be worth even more and you will have had 10 great years of enjoyment reading and looking through your complete set.
May 7th, 2015 at 2:02 pm
Walker, I’m delighted with your post as I wasn’t sure how the early issues were bound. I have a complete set but my bedsheet size issues are bound in two volumes and, frankly, I think that is the best considering the poor copies that turn up individually. However I believe the reason why they didn’t sell was not only because this set was bound but because many collectors already have a lot and only want a few and aren’t going to buy a set. I believe the Robinson set went to someone who is selling, or has sold off, his own copies to part fund the purchase. And, of course, the condition of that set was remarkable. Alistair
May 7th, 2015 at 2:05 pm
I agree that all your points are valid. Those early bound volumes reduce interest in the set. Sure I would love to have them but I would never pay a premium. Bound volumes are nice to have for reading but most times when I get one, I always want the issues unbound too. And a lot (but not all, of course) bound volumes have more fragile paper than loose issues. Maybe that has to do with bound volumes getting stored improperly.
This set will probably go for some decent money when/if broken up. I can only think of a few pulp collectors that have the kind of price asked, and they probably have their own their set by now.
I will disagree and say that 1925 isn’t a bad year for Weird Tales, it was when it started to pick up in quality.
May 7th, 2015 at 2:12 pm
I mostly collected to read and for covers, but primarily to read. Condition, so long as the pages didn’t crumble to wood pulp when I opened them, was not important. Bound volumes only meant that I got more reading material for my dollar than individual issues and I didn’t have to struggle to read serials.
A complete run of WT (though I agree about the early issues) bound would be a greater treasure for my purpose since I don’t speculate or look to make a profit. I strictly collect to read. I would certainly drool over a complete set of Argosy, Adventure, Black Mask, or Dime Detective bound. I had bound sets of some minor pulps at one time and certainly preferred reading them than those delicate individual editions.
I do have an 18th century family Bible from 1725 I won’t have rebound, but that is more sentimental than anything else. The interior is fine and the damage to the spine not crippling. Actually it opens and is easier to read like it is. New binding would make it stiffer to read and lessen the value.
I grant, readily, that binding causes cover issues and not all bound collections were treated well (hardly a concern I would think with Frank Robinson)but strictly as a reader the mere fact that bound collections tend to be complete and cheaper is a tremendous advantage.
But I buy to read, so unless there is something significantly unique about a true first edition or a pristine edition of a magazine a good reading copy is as important to me as an original. I felt the same about comics — I would as soon have an attractive Archive collection as a complete set of the originals I had to read under glass with gloves on in a sterile room.
Much of todays market is driven by investment potential as much if not more than love of the material.
May 7th, 2015 at 2:33 pm
The only bound set I have is, I believe, a ZD office copy of the FANTASTIC ADVENTURES volume with Fritz Leiber’s YOU’RE ALL ALONE, July-December 1950. Picked up inexpensively. Like David, I lean towar reading copies.
May 7th, 2015 at 3:40 pm
Alistair: Another reason is the fact that replica copies of all the early issues are now easily available from Girasol. Why pay thousands when you can get a nice replica for only $35.00 each.
Rob: You may be right about 1925. I know I was very disappointed when I tried to read the 1923 and 1924 years. Lovecraft was in them but that’s about all.
May 7th, 2015 at 3:46 pm
David: Looking at my sets I see that my bound volumes are usually in addition to my loose, individual copies. For instance I have UNKNOWN both bound and unbound. The bound set is John Campbell’s personal copy. I have ASTOUNDING 1930-1941 both bound and unbound. Also some issues of FAMOUS FANTASIC MYSTERY. Why bother with both bound and unbound? Love…
Todd: At Windy City and Pulpfest, I often see bound pulps but they don’t seem to be much in demand. Not like they used to, that’s for sure.
May 7th, 2015 at 4:20 pm
Walker,
Great post.I was curious why the Weird tales did not sell.Thanks for letting me know.Agree with you on the early WT and bound volumes.However I am getting the 1920’s WT from Girasol and buying the actual 1930’s and 40’s.great reading.
May 7th, 2015 at 5:28 pm
Digges and I have talked about the Girasol reprints. They may not be the original magazines but they are a cheap substitute that works just as well.
Concerning his comment about the 1930’s and 1940’s, it is still possible to get WT fairly inexpensive in these years. I’ve seen him do it at Windy City. They may not be fine condition but they will do in good to VG shape.
May 8th, 2015 at 11:14 pm
Years ago I used to collect the 1940s Weird Tales, but lost interest in them after acquiring many of them. I eventually sold them as a lot to one collector. My tastes changed, that all it was.
May 8th, 2015 at 11:23 pm
Hi Monte. Many collectors pass by the 1940’s WEIRD TALES but I’ve found the fiction to be quite good. The artwork is very well done also. Copies in the forties are still inexpensive compared to the twenties and thirties.
May 9th, 2015 at 5:58 am
As always Walker an excellent article. My thoughts are that I have never cared for bound volumes of pulps. I do have a few in my collection as I bought them from Andy Biegel on my last visit to his home before his death. They are bound volumes of Mammoth Detective and appear to have been the personal copies of Howard Browne who not only wrote for the magazine but was the editor from 1943 on. I treasure them not because they are bound (although they were nicely done) but because I got them from my friend Andy. About the tape, etc. on pulps Andy had what I thought was a strange habit in that he would buy a perfectly fine copy of Weird Tales and the next time I would see the magazine I would notice that Andy had run magic tape on the outside edge of the cover (usually on the inside). I too have seen some very odd repairs on pulps ranging from masking tape to that brown paper tape that I think was around in the 1930’s and 1940’s
May 9th, 2015 at 6:00 am
Walker Martin said:
“In 10 years the new car will be ready for the scrap heap but in 10 years the WEIRD TALES set will probably be worth even more and you will have had 10 great years of enjoyment reading and looking through your complete set.”
I could just hear myself trying that argument on my wife.
May 9th, 2015 at 8:21 am
The old time collectors at times seemed to have some sort of fetish about putting tape on the spine and cover. Even if there was no problem they would use all sorts of tape.
Some also liked to trim their pulps and used scissors and paper cutters, usually with poor results. I once bought over a hundred SHADOWS that had been ruined by someone using a paper cutter with a dull blade. They were in terrible condition.
May 10th, 2015 at 9:57 am
I prefer 1940s WT, and I believe Mike Ashley has said as much for himself, as well. Leiber, Sturgeon, St. Clair, Wakefield, Wellman, Bloch finding his own voice…Wright published some great work, and no little terrible. McIlwraith and her assistants cut the latter and had no lack of the former to offer.
May 10th, 2015 at 10:37 am
I think more and more collectors are coming to the conclusion that WT was good in the 1940’s and definitely worth reading. In addition to the authors that Todd mentions above, Ray Bradbury also had several of his early stories in the forties WEIRD TALES.
May 17th, 2015 at 5:00 pm
I have several famous books that were owned by a linguist in the next building, who died without a will He was gay, and 30 years ago being gay meant your family sometimes disowned you. Such was his case, so people in the building took what they wanted from his collection. Several of those books have duct tape covering the spines, so they’re not that desirable. But they’re nice copies nonetheless!
May 17th, 2015 at 6:19 pm
Recently a collector sent me an email about the practice of using all sorts of tape on books. I got the impression that he did not believe that someone would use duct tape, etc. As Andy points out duct tape was sometime used and I’ve seen it myself. Hard to believe…
January 1st, 2018 at 6:03 am
Thirty months on I’m curious as to what happened to this lot. Was it sold complete, was it broken up? Do you know, Walker?