THE BACKWARD REVIEWER
William F. Deeck


BERYL WHITAKER – Of Mice and Murder.   Robert Hale, UK, hardcover, 1967. No US edition.

BERYL WHITAKER Of Mice and Murder

   Ten o’clock on a Sunday morning is a fortuitous hour in most households. There is the prospect of indolence, and a sense of ill staved off. There is a more expansive, more leisurely breakfast than usual: there is the News of the World. In all save the totally discouraged hope revives, and does not flicker out until approximately six-fifteen.

   It is difficult not to expect good things from a novel that begins in such a manner, and Whitaker provides them. Her detective, in this and apparently her three other novels, is John Abbot, a schoolmaster with a private income and criminology for a hobby. Abbot is not a particularly interesting man; thus, paradoxically, he is most interesting.

   With no present crime to pique his interest, he is studying the William Herbert Wallace case. He abandons this when his twin sister points out the affair at Turton Caundle, where a human body was burned in place of the traditionally stuffed “Winter Figure.”

   Abbot goes to the village to investigate and finds himself becoming equally as, perhaps more, interested in a horrible accident that took place in the village a few months earlier.

   Despite the murderer and the motive being evident, the novel holds one’s attention. The light beginning changes to a darker tint as the plot unfolds and Abbot, in his interviews, discovers the solution. Very close to first class.

– From The MYSTERY FANcier, Vol. 13, No. 3, Summer 1992.



  Bibliographic Data:   [Taken from the Revised Crime Fiction IV, by Allen J. Hubin.]

WHITAKER, BERYL (Salisbury). 1916-1996. Series Character: John Abbot, in all.

      Of Mice and Murder (n.) Hale 1967.
      A Matter of Blood (n.) Hale 1967.

BERYL WHITAKER

      The Chained Crocodile (n.) Hale 1967.

BERYL WHITAKER

      The Man Who Wasn’t There (n.) Hale 1968.

BERYL WHITAKER


Editorial Comments:   At the moment, this is all I know about the author. Of her four mysteries, copies of only two of them can be found for sale on the Internet, Crocodile and Mice, with only two sellers offering the latter for sale, one for around $50, the other $120. Out of my league, I’m afraid.

     Bill’s review makes the $50 one tempting, though, as he seldom used the phrase “first class” to describe a book. I wish he’d gone into more detail about what he found so enjoyable. It’s tantalizing to read what he has to say and be unable to ask him more.

[UPDATE] 03-22-10. British mystery bookseller Jamie Sturgeon has come across an erroneous entry for the author in Contemporary Science Fiction Authors, included at the editors’ own admission that none of the books she had written at that time were SF.

     From the data presented, however, the chronological order of the books has been revised (see above), and the correct spelling of Beryl Whitaker’s middle name (Salusbury) will be noted as such in the next installment of the online Addenda to the Revised Crime Fiction IV, by Allen J. Hubin.

     Beryl Whitaker was born August 8, 1916, the daughter of Charles and Rosamund Colman (originally Collmann). Salusbury was her mother’s maiden name. She was married three times; her third husband was Gerald Whitaker, with whom she had three children. She died, as was previously known, in 1996.

     Besides the four mystery novels, Jamie also discovered a short story collected in John Creasey’s Mystery Bedside Book 1974 (1973), the title of which is “Two Birds and a Stone,” which first appeared in London Mystery Magazine. Mrs. Whitaker also promised the editors of Contemporary SF Authors that her next novel would be science fiction, but if the book was ever written and published (and if so, under a pen name) is not known.

[UPDATE #2]  Later the same day. In a copy of one of her books, Jamie has discovered a handwritten Thank You note from the author to a friend. Omitting the portions of a personal nature, Mrs. Whitaker says in part:

      “I thought I would write thrillers because I didn’t reckon I had the talent to write the stuff I’d really like to. So you see this is why my little crime novels have their serious side, and are in some cases, sad.”

[UPDATE #3] 03-23-10   Thanks to Jamie once again for supplying the cover images you now see.

A MOVIE REVIEW BY DAVID L. VINEYARD:         


ACROSS THE PACIFIC Bogart

ACROSS THE PACIFIC. Warner Brothers, 1942. Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor, Sidney Greenstreet, Victor Sen Yung, Keye Luke, Charles Halton, Richard Loo, Monte Blue. Screenplay by Richard Macauley, based on a Saturday Evening Post serial “Aloha Means Goodbye” by Robert Carson. Directed by John Huston .

    Humphrey Bogart: I never saw anybody like you, you never have any clothes on.

    Mary Astor: Well if anyone heard you complaining about it they would put you in a psychopathic ward.

   It was inevitable that any follow up to The Maltese Falcon was going to be anti-climactic, which is a shame, because this lighthearted flag-waver has a myriad of charms all its own including the sexual byplay between Bogart and Mary Astor, and Sidney Greenstreet’s treacherous Dr. Lorenz.

   And it probably didn’t help that midway through production the Second World War broke out with the very much for real attack on Pearl Harbor, and the plot about a fictional Japanese attack at the same location was suddenly too serious for this lighthearted treatment.

   The production took a hiatus while the script was quickly rewritten, and somehow in the transition the title remained unchanged, even though now the ship in question never even reaches the Pacific. (It might also explain some less competent model work than usually seen from the studio effects department.)

ACROSS THE PACIFIC Bogart

   Bogart is Rick Leland, a US Army officer cashiered for irregularities with company funds. He heads for Canada hoping to enlist, but they want no part of him, so he determines to sell his services to the Chinese and sets sail on a Japanese ship sailing for Panama and then Yokohama.

   On board the ship are Dr. Lorenz (who teaches economics in Manila), his servant, and Alberta Marlowe (Mary Astor)

    Humphrey Bogart: Don’t be an innocent bystander; they always get hurt.

who claims to be a simple girl from Medicine Hat out to see the world despite a wardrobe to die for and the sophistication of a woman of the world.

   And as you quickly learn, nothing is exactly what it seems. Lorenz managed to get Leland on the ship because he knows of his military background, and Leland is in reality a secret agent, his disgrace a cover designed to lure Lorenz and the Japanese into approaching him.

ACROSS THE PACIFIC Bogart

   After a stop over in New York where Victor Sen Yung comes on board as a jive-talking Japanese American sailing East to take over family business interest, Leland and Astor stop a Filipino from assassinating Lorenz.

    Humphrey Bogart: How are you doing, angel?

    Mary Astor: I think I got pushed in the face by someone. My – My lipstick’s smeared.

    Humphrey Bogart: Aww, you look cute.

    Mary Astor: And now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ll go to my cabin… and faint.

the good doctor makes it clear he wants information from Leland about Panama’s defenses and is willing to pay for it while Leland romances Miss Marlowe

    Mary Astor: I’m not so obsessed with money as you seem to be. I can do without it.

    Humphrey Bogart: You stick around with me and you’ll get plenty of practice.

and ingratiates himself with Lorenz.

    Humphrey Bogart: (comparing his gun to Lorenz’s) : Mine’s bigger.

ACROSS THE PACIFIC Bogart

   Once in Panama, things move fast. Astor disappears, and Greenstreet outwits Leland and gets the plans for the Canal’s air defenses. Leland meets a Chinese at a Japanese theater in Panama where a well staged shootout ensues, and then heads for a plantation that has been mentioned as a place of interest.

   There he finds Astor, the daughter of the westerner (Monte Blue) forced to front for the Japanese, and discovers a hidden airfield built in the jungle. It’s December 6th, 1941, and using the information gotten from Leland, the Japanese are going to bomb the Canal to coincide with the attack on Pearl Harbor.

   Of course they are no match for our hero, who dispatches Victor Sen Yung with a right cross and grabs Richard Loo’s .50 caliber machine gun to shoot down the bomber and take care of the rest.

   Back at the plantation Sidney Greenstreet contemplates hari-kiri, but lacks the nerve and Leland arrests him.

    Humphrey Bogart: I’m disappointed. All that talk about will and strength.

   And as they step outside a formation of American planes flies over:

    Humphrey Bogart: Any of your friends in Tokyo have trouble committing hari-kiri, those boys’d be glad to help them out.

ACROSS THE PACIFIC Bogart

   No one is arguing that this is the same category as The Maltese Falcon, but it is a remarkably assured and entertaining spy film with dialogue that sparkles and real sexual tension between Bogart and Astor.

   This often gets lost among the bigger (and better) films of Bogart and Huston, but deserves to be seen and enjoyed. It’s fast, flip, sexy, and well acted by all concerned.

   Maybe we should just be grateful that there are so many great films that this terrific good film gets lost in the shuffle. This tongue-in-cheek thriller is still fresh and smart, and more modern than most similar films of the era.

Note: Huston left to join the war effort and the final scene was shot by Vincent Sherman. And for some reason the two maps showing the Canal in the film are wrong. The one at the end of the film upside down with the Pacific on Panama’s East Coast! I suppose it’s possible the intent was to keep the enemy from using the maps, but you have to imagine the Japanese knew where the Canal was. You wouldn’t think it would be that easy to disguise.

REVIEWED BY GEOFF BRADLEY:         


CRIMINAL JUSTICE BBC 2009

CRIMINAL JUSTICE. BBC, UK. Second series: 5 through 9 October 2009.

Maxine Peake, Denis Lawson, Sophie Okonedo, Steven Mackintosh, Kate Hardie, Nadine Marshall, Matthew Macfadyen, Zoe Telford. Written by Peter Moffat; director: Yann Demange.

   This was a highly touted five part series (one hour each, no adverts) shown over five successive nights. It was actually the second under this title, but as I seemed to be the only person who didn’t enjoy last year’s opener, I was fearing the worst.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE BBC 2009

   Actually this story of an oppressed wife who stabs her husband but then refuses to talk about it had some very good scenes and seemed to me to be on a different level that last year’s story.

   We saw the progress of the wife through the flawed justice system both through the courts and on remand in the prison system. At times slow moving, and implausible in places, there were enough moving moments to make this worth persevering with.

HANNAH MARCH – The Complaint of the Dove. Headline,UK, hardcover & paperback, 1999. First US publication: Signet, paperback, March 2003.

   As far as I’ve been able to determine, this is a First Novel, and if such it is, it’s all the more remarkable, since this is a mystery taking place in 1760s England that’s as splendid a fair-play detective novel as it is an outstanding work of historical fiction.

HANNAH MARCH Robert Fairfax

   The hero and reluctant sleuth is Robert Fairfax, private tutor to a young, headstrong son of an ailing but wealthy father. Determining that a trip to London would widen young Matthew Hemsley’s horizon’s, Fairfax does not foresee the disaster in store: his young ward accused of murder and jailed in Newgate prison.

   The early third of the tale is humorous, warm and witty, as Robert and Matthew get a rare peek behind the scenes of a London musical theatre, where singer and performer Lucy Dove is the talk of the town.

   Young Matthew is instantly smitten, again not part of Fairfax’s original instruction plans, but in terms of showing him the ways of the world, then yes.

   The story takes a distinct turn to the melancholy, however, when sudden death interjects itself, and Fairfax hitherto unused skills in detection are the young boy’s only hopes. He’s up to the task, however, in a very neatly plotted tale, with clues and motives galore.

   Nor is the book any slouch, either, when it comes to giving the reader the authentic feeling of visiting the city of London of almost 250 years ago. Here’s how March describes a gala party to which Fairfax is invited, as his travels and deliberations grant him long glimpses into both the highs and lows of the day’s society. From page 212:

   Here was high fashion, and it was a world harsh, thrustful, glittering. Vivid acquisitive faces outstared each other beneath unignorable wigs: scarlet heels tapped, snuffboxes and lace handkerchiefs were flourished, exquisitely painted fans wagged and snapped on all sides. There were women here so corseted, painted, plucked, and powdered that it was really impossible to say what they might look like in a state of nature: men, too, their faces grimly doll-like, their waists pinched and their stockinged calves padded out with cork.

   As well as telling a tough sort of coming-of-age story, March also allows Fairfax’s own mysterious past to come gradually to light, giving us a detective that we see fully realized as flawed, but one we’d most assuredly like to see more of.

PostScript: Doing some Googling on the Internet produces the following Good News. The second Robert Fairfax mystery was The Devil’s Highway (Headline, 2000), and Googling some more … apparently there are now five in the series in all. We in the US are going to have some catching up to do.

— June 2003


[UPDATE] 03-17-10. More information about Hannah March that I’d hadn’t found or thought to include with the earlier review. Expanded from “her” entry the Revised Crime Fiction IV, by Allen J. Hubin:

MARCH, HANNAH. Pseudonym of Tim Wilson, 1962- . Series character in all: Robert Fairfax.

    * The Complaint of the Dove (n.) Headline 1999 [London; 1760]
    * The Devil’s Highway (n.) Headline 1999 [London; 1761]

HANNAH MARCH Robert Fairfax

    * A Distinction of Blood (n.) Headline 2000 [London; 1762]

HANNAH MARCH Robert Fairfax

    * Death Be My Theme (n.) Headline 2000 [London; 1764]
    * A Necessary Evil (n.) Headline 2001 [Bath; ??]

   The first three were published in the US by Signet as paperback originals. Neither of the last two have been published in the US. When Fairfax’s career as a fictional detective came to close, author Tim Wilson seems to have switched to writing historical fiction without a detective, this time under the name of Jude Morgan.

   Of eight books so far in the latter category, the most recent is Charlotte and Emily: A Novel of the Brontes (2010).

REVIEWED BY WALTER ALBERT:         


DAVID DOWNING – Zoo Station. Soho Press, hardcover, May 2007; trade paperback, May 2008.

   This is yet another novel set in Nazi Germany in 1939, as the war clouds thicken, with a protagonist (Anglo-American journalist John Russell), who has lived and worked in Germany for a number of years.

david downing

   He also has a son from a failed marriage to a German national, and he’s involved in a long-standing relationship with a German actress, which make him unwilling to leave the country and of increasing interest to foreign governments (Russian, British, and American), who want to exploit his privileged situation to their own political ends.

   In spite of his reservations, he is unable to resist their demands, with the result that he finds himself operating as a document courier serving more than one foreign government.

   I’m not a particular fan of conventional spy fiction, but Downing’s portrayal of life in Germany in the late thirties overrode all my objections. Russell is a complex fictional creation, and his increasingly tense situation is depicted with great skill.

   Downing has written at least two sequels, one of which I have on my shelf. I don’t as yet find myself as impressed by his achievement as I was by Philip Kerr’s Bernie Gunther series, but I’m interested enough to be looking forward to see how the series develops in the first sequel.

        The John Russell Series

    1. Zoo Station (2007)
    2. Silesian Station (2008)

david downing

    3. Stettin Station (2009)
    4. Potsdam Station (2010)

A TV Review by MIKE TOONEY:


“Nobody Will Ever Know.” An episode of Kraft Suspense Theatre (Season 2, Episode 19). First air date: 25 March 1965. Tom Tryon, Pippa Scott, Myrna Fahey, Liam Sullivan, Robert Quarry, David Lewis, Frank Maxwell. Teleplay: Richard Fielder and Harry Essex. Story: Roger H. Lewis. Director: Don Weis.

   Tom Banning (Tom Tryon) seems to have it all: a well-paying research position at Continental Plastics, being married to the boss’s daughter, and the prospect of a promotion.

   So why is he skulking around a chemical laboratory with a camera photographing secret bench experiments, engaging in industrial espionage?

THOMAS TRYON

   Could it have to do with the fact that he’s not making enough money to cover the bills? That he resents his father-in-law’s intrusions into their private lives? That although he’s due for that promotion soon, he’s afraid he might not get it?

   That there’s an extremely attractive woman, part of the evaluation team, with whom he’s having an affair? That the money he’s getting for his spying would solve all their financial difficulties? Or could it be that the people he’s working for have guns and won’t hesitate to use them?

   How about all of the above?

   As Thomas Tryon, Tom Tryon made the bestseller lists with his written fiction (The Other, Harvest Home, Lady, etc.).

   Liam Sullivan specialized in playing villains almost entirely on TV, with three appearances on Perry Mason (1961-62), a Western series (The Monroes, 1966-67), a nice turn as a sadistic overlord in Star Trek (1967), as well as several primetime TV soaps.

   Frank Maxwell could be seen on TV just about anytime during the ’50s through the ’70s, including Perry Mason (1960-61), a comedy series (Our Man Higgins, 1962-63), two other episodes of Kraft Suspense Theatre (including “Leviathan Five”, reviewed here ), one Banacek (“Now You See Me, Now You Don’t”), five Barnaby Jones episodes, and four appearances on Quincy, M.E.

Editorial Comment:   Tom Tryon was born in Hartford, the city around the corner and up the street from me, and as something of a native son, all of his accomplishments, both in TV and the movies, then later as a bestselling author, were always written up in the local paper — the one I used to write mystery reviews for — but I’ve never read any of his fiction, I’m sad to say.

   The photo is only a publicity shot. It has nothing to do with the TV show that Mike just reviewed, but it’s how I remember him as an actor the most, with a solidly sculptured face and lots of hair.

REVIEWED BY DAN STUMPF:         


PIERRE BOILEAU & THOMAS NARCEJAC – Vertigo. Dell 977, reprint paperback, April 1958. UK edition: The Living and the Dead, Hutchinson, hc, 1956. First US edition: Ives Washburn, 1957. Translation of D’Entre les Morts, Paris, 1954. Film: Paramount, 1958, as Vertigo (Kim Novak, James Stewart; director: Alfred Hitchcock).

BOILEAU & NARCEJAC Vertigo

   As the basis for Hitchcock’s film, the book by Boileau and Narcejac shows an interesting contrast in attitude and approach to the story: where Vertigo the movie is melancholy and romantic, Vertigo the book is merely sad and cynical, mainly because the authors undercut the story at every turn with a detachment that was probably meant to be objective but comes off as merely snide.

   In the film, for instance, when Scotty rescues Madeleine from drowning, it sparks a romantic (and sexual) connection between them that suffuses the rest of the story. In the book, the authors play up the mundane aspects of the aftermath, with the couple marking time sitting around a cheap bar in borrowed clothes, finding nothing to say to each other.

   Later on, the affair with Judy (Renee in the book) becomes a tawdry thing, played out in cramped hotel rooms and bad restaurants, with the hero dogging around after a woman who is obviously sick of him.

   All of which may be more realistic than Hitchcock’s brilliantly realized amour fou (I don’t say it is more realistic; just that it may be) but makes for definitely less satisfying drama.

   In fact, there is a twist in the book that is not in the movie; it’s a delicious little turn, rising naturally out of characters behaving as they should, yet totally unexpected and supremely ironic. Boileau and Narcejac simply toss it away — just write it and forget it, and never exploit what could have been a major development. This ain’t objectivity, it’s just bad writing.

DAY OF THE WOLVES. Gold Key, 1973. Richard Egan, Martha Hyer, Rick Jason, Jan Murray, Jack Bailey, Percy Helton, Herb Vigran. Screenwriter-producer-director: Ferde Grofé Jr.

   There is something to be said about production values. You have to have a story to begin with, but without a budget to back it up and without a director to make the actors sound good and look better, the whole business of making movies is a waste of time.

THE DAY OF THE WOLVES 1973

   Case in point, right here. This is a nifty tale of a gang of seven men, individually recruited and deliberately kept uninformed of each other’s identities (known to each other only by numbers), who take over a small isolated town by locking up the small police force and robbing all the main businesses in organized fashion over a period of three hours or so.

   Jan Murray (the comedian and TV game show host) is Number One, the leader of the group, and Richard Egan is the sheriff who’s just gotten fired (by a pitifully weak city council) and even so is the only man in town willing and able to fight back. Martha Hyer as his wife does not have much a role, this movie coming very much toward the end of her career.

   The plan does not go off without a hitch, as I hope I’ve led you to believe, but it’s still a good one — the plan, that is — and watching the gang of seven put it together and try to pull it off makes for entertaining viewing.

   The photography and camera angles are poor, however, bargain basement level, the sound man was in a different truck, and what this movie desperately needed and didn’t get was a director who, as I said above, was able to put his actors in the best possible light.

   The production is flat, in other words, and with the Hollywood cast mixed in with local townspeople (Lake Havasu City, Arizona) and only a little exaggeration, it was sometimes difficult to tell the difference (Richard Egan and Jan Murray being two notable exceptions).

   I didn’t much care for the ending, not as much as I’ve read what others have had to say about this movie. I think personally that Ferde Grofé had run out of cleverness at that point, and went with the obvious. Money for a better movie he never had all along.

A MOVIE REVIEW BY DAVID L. VINEYARD:         


SPLIT SECOND Alexis Smith

SPLIT SECOND. RKO Radio Pictures, 1953. Stephen McNally, Alexis Smith, Jan Sterling, Keith Andes, Arthur Hunnicutt, Paul Kelly, RIchard Egan, Robert Paige, Frank DeKova. Screenplay: William Bowers & Irving Wallace, based on a story by Chester Erskine & Irving Wallace. Director: Dick Powell.

    Keith Andes: “You don’t think very much of people, do you?”

    Stephen McNally: “I don’t think very much of anything.”

   This terrific little minor “A” film with top “B” values features a number of popular themes from the early fifties, including the brutal superman with fascist tendencies and philosophy, the small group of diverse people under incredible tension, and the terrifying threat of atomic annihilation that seemed to hang over us all.

   The latter is especially potent for those of us young enough to remember “Duck and Cover” exercises in grade school. It was always hard to adjust back to Dick and Jane after contemplating that nuclear blast.

   So when ever this one shows up on television drag out the VCR or DVR and get your finger ready on the record button. It’s a tautly directed effort from actor Dick Powell (his first), whose career as a director varies from wartime drama like The Enemy Below and The Hunters to the musical remake of It Happened One Night as You Can’t Run Away From It and the infamous The Conqueror (with John Wayne as Genghis Khan — “I will have this Tartar woman.”).

   Story and screenplay are co-written by bestselling novelist Irving Wallace (The Chapman Report, The Prize, The Three Sirens …)

SPLIT SECOND Alexis Smith

   Stephen McNally is Sam Hurley, an escaped convict and one of the nastiest pieces of business since Bogart’s Duke Mantee set the standard for this sort of thing way back in The Petrified Forest. McNally is a brutal monster, not smart, but clever and ruthless. It’s his idea to hide out in New Hope City, Nevada, an abandoned mining town, a place literally no one will look because it is destined to be the site of a nuclear test the next morning.

   Trapped with him is the usual assortment of the good, the weak, and the simply human: Andes, Alexis Smith, Jan Sterling, doctor Richard Egan, prospector Arthur Hunnicutt. Stir well, and let simmer in an isolated place while the police close in and the clock ticks down and you have just about a perfect recipe for this kind of film.

   Combining with the first class performance by McNally as the convict is Alexis Smith as a sexy high class dame who represents everything he resents and can never have or be, and watch as the people involved either find unexpected strength or crumble under the pressure as the bomb literally ticks down, and the deadline to get out grows narrower and narrower. Paul Kelly is good as McNally’s only tenuous tie to decent human feelings.

SPLIT SECOND Alexis Smith

   This one ratchets up the tension with real skill. It can be as uncomfortable as the desert sand under the skin and as raw as the endless hot wind on the nerves. At times it becomes almost unbearable.

   Okay, admittedly the security around the nuclear test site is a little lax, and you have to wonder what kind of a hold even the brutal McNally could have over his men that they would go along with this insanity, but give the film its few minor logic problems (Egan’s doctor pretty much just drives into town without even pretending to sneak), and this film builds to a great deal of very real tension.

   For some reason Split Second has always reminded me of another taut little suspenser set in the desert, Inferno, though there is really little similarity between the films. Maybe it’s because both films build to a point where your participation in the suspense is almost visceral.

   McNally was one of the few actors who seemed as at home as the hero as the villain, which may be why his bad guy roles have a resonance that many actors don’t or can’t bring. We always knew he could play as stalwart and straight as he did brutal and sociopathic, which gave his charming monsters an added dimension missing in some other actors (in this he always reminded me of Robert Ryan, star of the above mentioned Inferno).

SPLIT SECOND Alexis Smith

   Alexis Smith made a career of playing smart sexy women who had brains as well as nerves, and Jan Sterling was one of the great ‘dame’ players always giving her roles an added edge of humanity, that culminated in an Oscar nomination for her aging bad girl with one last chance in The High and the Mighty (ironically another film about a small group of people under pressure). It’s no accident that she and Smith both get top billing over the films ‘hero’ Keith Andes.

   I won’t give away the ending, save to point out it’s fairly clever and just within the bounds of possibility if not probability. See this one and enjoy it. It’s a little film that will stick to your ribs a lot longer than some of the bigger more celebrated films of that era.

   But don’t watch it if you are already tense or if your blood pressure is high. This one could put it through the roof.

SPLIT SECOND Alexis Smith

MARQUAND Your Turn Mr Moto

JOHN P. MARQUAND – Your Turn, Mr. Moto. Little Brown, paperback reprint, July 1985. Originally published in hardcover as No Hero: Little Brown, 1935. Previously serialized in The Saturday Evening Post, 30 March to 04 May 1935, as “Mr. Moto Takes A Hand.” First published as Your Turn, Mr. Moto by Berkley, F756, ppbk, May 1963. Other reprint editions include Popular Library, pb, 1977.

   It is difficult to say, for me that is, at this point of time, how it happened that Mr. Moto, an agent of the Japanese empire before World War II, become such a popular series character in the United States.

   He is a key figure in Your Turn, for example, the first book in the series, but while he appears frequently at regular intervals, he is not on stage all that long. He is an instigator and a facilitator as far as the story line is concerned, but as an investigator, much of his work is conducted behind the scenes.

MARQUAND Your Turn Mr Moto

   He is also inscrutable, in the sense of the word often used to describe Asians (having motives that are not readily investigated, interpreted, or understood), which may help understand his appeal.

   The story itself is told in first person by a washed-up American daredevil pilot named Casey Lee. Having one last contract canceled, a stunt that would have involved a flight across the Pacific starting from Japan, Casey rails against the world in a drunken furor, including the US, words overheard and relayed to Mr. Moto, who decides that he can make good use of the self-expatriated aviator.

   As part of the enticement, as if Casey needed one, as he’s desperately in need of a job, no matter who offers it, is a young woman named Sonya, a White Russian in exile herself. The plot and the situation that Casey soon finds himself in are both complicated and simple. Plans for converting oil into a fuel that will double the range of ships and planes are missing, and Casey may be the person who unknowingly knows where they are.

MARQUAND Your Turn Mr Moto

   Marquand’s writing is clear, smooth and informative. In those days before World War II, every nation involved in the affairs of the Far East, which included both Britain and the US, as well as Japan, China and Russia, have a stake in them, and Marquand makes each country’s perspective much more understandable than any textbook I had in high school ever did.

   The backdrop of a region on edge, filled with refugees going here and there and an agent from every major power always within earshot, is equally well done, nearly to perfection.

   It is disappointing, then, to have to say that the key points of the mystery itself, as opposed to the setting and the budding romance (which of course?) are muddled. Not badly, but enough to cause me to wish more Marquand had decided to focus on it more than he did.

« Previous PageNext Page »